Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2023/24


charlierc

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, thetime said:

When you think where you've been for a decade, 7th is a great season. Think we've discussed before, it's going to be incredibly difficult for Newcastle to do a chelsea/city.

Personally think you are just 10 years to late to have any major impact going for titles. Europa and the occasional top 4, when the likes of Liverpool are off it, is your level. 

 

It's about building it up imo. I was surprised we got 4th last season but I'm under no illusions of yet being in a place to demand it year-in year-out. It's a harder project than Man City/Chelsea because of FFP and there being a rich 6 to play against, so the main thing is ultimately about needing a few years to try to build up a top-6 level income as much as anything. Won't be easy ofc.

Certainly it's one of the few reasons why there's a merit in tickets being only for members paying £40 a go, much as I hate it as it makes it much harder for someone like me who lives down south and can only go to 2/3 games a year to go.

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

Off titles yes. I'd like to think winning a cup might be doable before that.

Given some of the names who have won cups since the 1969 Fairs Cup title Newcastle won, I'd like to think it could've been doable before now. But it's worth trying to get one in. After all, the floodgates opened for Man City by winning the FA Cup in 2011 while there's that thing of going "If Blackburn, Birmingham, Swansea or Wigan can do it..."

Edited by charlierc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Neil said:

ratcliffe talking about man utd quitting old trafford, and trying to get the govt to pay for the new stadium.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68361025

It's quite something how quickly some people went from seeing him as Man Utd's saviour to now thinking he might not be all that was cracked up to be. Being on the fence on the Mason Greenwood case didn't exactly endear him to people either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, charlierc said:

It's quite something how quickly some people went from seeing him as Man Utd's saviour to now thinking he might not be all that was cracked up to be. Being on the fence on the Mason Greenwood case didn't exactly endear him to people either.

richest club in the country and richest tax avoider want govt hand_out - its not a good look????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Neil said:

richest club in the country and richest tax avoider want govt hand_out - its not a good look????

The i paper is reporting the government said no to public money for this exercise. So they'll have to - heaven forfend - pay for it themselves.

Same, presumably, with the Dan Ashworth case, given they seemed to think Newcastle would just hand him over. Imo a deal is there to be done for him, but it's gonna require more than just "Be a shame to have him do nothing for two years"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/22/2024 at 6:01 PM, charlierc said:

It's quite something how quickly some people went from seeing him as Man Utd's saviour to now thinking he might not be all that was cracked up to be. Being on the fence on the Mason Greenwood case didn't exactly endear him to people either.

I dont know any utd fan who saw him as a saviour, online or offline. Just a better alternative to sport washing or the glazers. 

Which not many could argue with really. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I fully registered that Sven Botman played on for 2 games with ACL damage and refused surgery because it would've ended his season in September. Which may add another reason why our defence looks flimsy given he had a bit of a shocker yesterday. Plus the lack of an out-and-out holding midfielder doesn't help.

Quite something one of the few Newcastle players to get credit yesterday was Loris Karius, to the point where I've seen some suggest make him number one until Nick Pope returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2024 at 7:14 PM, thetime said:

I dont know any utd fan who saw him as a saviour, online or offline. Just a better alternative to sport washing or the glazers. 

Which not many could argue with really. 

Maybe it's the nature of the beast where you see certain things in Twixter's for you bollocks where it pops up.

Losing at home to Fulham and it being kinda deserved judging by the highlights indicates there's room for improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

 

Losing at home to Fulham and it being kinda deserved judging by the highlights indicates there's room for improvement.

Fulham more then deserved there win, Utd were dreadful. Lots of improvement, although the rumour of ross barkley signing does not bode well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/23/2024 at 7:14 PM, thetime said:

I dont know any utd fan who saw him as a saviour, online or offline. Just a better alternative to sport washing or the glazers. 

Which not many could argue with really. 

He'll milk the club like the glazers. You Don't become the richest tax avoider by leaving profits in a company .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thetime said:

Fulham more then deserved there win, Utd were dreadful. Lots of improvement, although the rumour of ross barkley signing does not bode well. 

Yeah that was quite an unexpected rumour. I know he's had an exceptional season at Luton in his first spell in the Premier League for a little while, and best run in the PL for even longer, but there's a difference between excelling there and at Old Trafford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, charlierc said:

Yeah that was quite an unexpected rumour. I know he's had an exceptional season at Luton in his first spell in the Premier League for a little while, and best run in the PL for even longer, but there's a difference between excelling there and at Old Trafford.

must be easy to excel at OT the standards are so low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetime said:

Grudgingly that was top class by Liverpool today. 

I'm genuinely puzzled as to the disallowed goal for Liverpool. I understand the reason why, but I don't think Colwill was getting there or was van Dijk's marker (that was Chilwell, who was basically pulling on the shirt the whole way into the box).

Chelsea have themselves to blame as well. They missed a pretty astonishing amount of chances in the final 15 or so of the 90.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neil said:

everton penalty reduced to six points

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/68273436

 

2 hours ago, Neil said:

looks like a stitch-up to me, to make sure only the right teams go down.

You say that, there's still a second charge looming for breaking these rules again that might get another deduction, with Nottingham Forest also waiting on a charge for this.

Although granted, this precedent hints they may have to recalculate things differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

Although granted, this precedent hints they may have to recalculate things differently.

yeah - city are going to get let off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Neil said:

yeah - city are going to get let off.

That case is going to a hearing later this year so one way or another it will be resolved, but is being conducted under such a level of secrecy that not many people know the specifics. The process really needs to be more transparent but it's not being brushed away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, charlierc said:

That case is going to a hearing later this year so one way or another it will be resolved, but is being conducted under such a level of secrecy that not many people know the specifics. The process really needs to be more transparent but it's not being brushed away.

Might not get resolved just like it hasn't been on the other occasions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Neil said:

Might not get resolved just like it hasn't been on the other occasions

Well, this is the issue with how the case is set up. There's different apparatus clearly required to decide if a team broke the limit over a 3-year financial report cycle than if a team spent 10 years fundamentally breaking the rules. The Premier League really should've taken the lead of the EFL, who actually had a process set up for this, even if it just seems to be repeatedly punishing clubs as is being seen at Reading, who have just this week been docked points again. 

The Everton case is imo why I think the Premier League needs to lift its loss-limit for a 3 year cycle. I know I'll be accused of bias because FFP/PSR is what Newcastle were blaming for not buying any players in January despite a squad that's looked like its running out of steam needing a few reinforcements, but I think a limit unchanged since its introduction in 2015/16 has failed to keep up with inflation, both real-world and football-specific inflation where transfer fees & wages have exploded.

Though saying that, if they did lift the limit, agents would just try and get it into higher wages and commissions. So... pfft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, charlierc said:

Well, this is the issue with how the case is set up. There's different apparatus clearly required to decide if a team broke the limit over a 3-year financial report cycle than if a team spent 10 years fundamentally breaking the rules. The Premier League really should've taken the lead of the EFL, who actually had a process set up for this, even if it just seems to be repeatedly punishing clubs as is being seen at Reading, who have just this week been docked points again. 

The Everton case is imo why I think the Premier League needs to lift its loss-limit for a 3 year cycle. I know I'll be accused of bias because FFP/PSR is what Newcastle were blaming for not buying any players in January despite a squad that's looked like its running out of steam needing a few reinforcements, but I think a limit unchanged since its introduction in 2015/16 has failed to keep up with inflation, both real-world and football-specific inflation where transfer fees & wages have exploded.

Though saying that, if they did lift the limit, agents would just try and get it into higher wages and commissions. So... pfft.

Yep totally biased. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...