Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Babies?


JennieT

Recommended Posts

Hi im going to have a 3 month old by the time Glasto comes round. I want to bring them along as I know others have, however my husband wants to leave them at home. I know people wont agree with either, but would like to hear about what people have done and how did it go?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have not got any kids but friends were thinking of taking a one year old next year. They were going to see what the weather was like and just go down as day trippers each day. If the weather was bad I reckon having a young child to push around the site in the mud would not be that much fun!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've taken our son twice - the first time he was 5 months, the second time 1 year 5 months. The first time, when he was younger, was actually a lot easier. He was only small, couldn't crawl or move around by himself and I was breastfeeding so it was easy to feed him anywhere. The second year was harder work, partly because he was older, walking and partly because it was wet and very muddy (mud and buggys don't mix!). We also have a campervan so weren't in a tent.

The Kidz field is great and Mendip NCT have a fab tent there with everything you could possibly need - changing facilities, nappies, sterilisers, high chairs and they'll even do you a baby bath.

I'd recommend a carrier of some sort and a decent off road buggy so you can deal with both sun and mud ;).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies. We have vw splitty that we hope to have on the road by June. Wouldn't entertain the idea in a tent. Not thought about checking the weather in advance. At least we can play by ear as they won't need a ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never taken a new born or been with people who have but I saw a couple this year with a new born and they were really struggling,the baby was crying,they were stressed,they weren't having a good time at all.

Obviously a baby is too young to appreciate a festival and I know it seems like a nice idea but I would agree with your husband.

It would be doable on a fair glastonbury but what about a really bad Glastonbury,that would be carnage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've taken our son twice - the first time he was 5 months, the second time 1 year 5 months. The first time, when he was younger, was actually a lot easier. He was only small, couldn't crawl or move around by himself and I was breastfeeding so it was easy to feed him anywhere. The second year was harder work, partly because he was older, walking and partly because it was wet and very muddy (mud and buggys don't mix!). We also have a campervan so weren't in a tent.

The Kidz field is great and Mendip NCT have a fab tent there with everything you could possibly need - changing facilities, nappies, sterilisers, high chairs and they'll even do you a baby bath.

I'd recommend a carrier of some sort and a decent off road buggy so you can deal with both sun and mud ;).

All of the above. We took our 6 week old this year. At this age all he wanted to do was sleep and eat. Got a good 2nd hand buggy off ebay, need one like Phil & Ted with 'bicycle' tyres as mush easier over rough ground and through mud.

Glad to have done it. It was a very different Glastonbury for us. Not just less alcohol but not able to move around so easily in the big crowds, being at the back of the crowds as needing a it of space. The NCT tent was an amazing oasis where they had changing mats, baths and plenty of space to feed.

We stayed in Worthy View for some comfort and the short trek car to tent, once out for the day didn't go back.

He will be a year old this year, have decided not to take him, will be moving and less happy in the buggy so parents looking after him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We took our 6 week old this year. At this age all he wanted to do was sleep and eat.

Impressed jamesrfisher! Not sure I would have been brave enough at 6 weeks. Although like you say, at that age they do just sleep so I guess it would be fairly easy. Easier than a one year old, certainly :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leave my 3 year old at home as too selfish to take her :)

Other festivals perhaps are easier (we did Camp Bestival this year and while it is no Glastonbury we had a really great time) but if you're keen I say go for it. Plenty who take babies/children and, from what others have said, the kid's field is pretty special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have done it twice and will say when the are really young it is easier than when they are more mobile. In fact when we brought our 9 month old to Glasto we had one of the best Glastos ever. Its a different experience for many reasons but it was very enjoyable

One word of advice you should adhere to, do not take any advise on this issue from people who have not brought a kid to Glastonbury. Its utterly worthless IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never taken a new born or been with people who have but I saw a couple this year with a new born and they were really struggling,the baby was crying,they were stressed,they weren't having a good time at all.

Obviously a baby is too young to appreciate a festival and I know it seems like a nice idea but I would agree with your husband.

It would be doable on a fair glastonbury but what about a really bad Glastonbury,that would be carnage.

I think it comes down to how the parents deal with the baby crying in "real life" theres some very stressed parents out there. Most never come back to a festival once they've experienced it once, whatever the age of the child.

I find most parents at Glastonbury very laid back and relaxed in how they raise their children, i include myself in this. However i think the majority of people who do bring kids have either been to glastonbury before childless or are more experienced in smaller festivals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it comes down to how the parents deal with the baby crying in "real life" theres some very stressed parents out there. Most never come back to a festival once they've experienced it once, whatever the age of the child.

I find most parents at Glastonbury very laid back and relaxed in how they raise their children, i include myself in this. However i think the majority of people who do bring kids have either been to glastonbury before childless or are more experienced in smaller festivals.

Yes I agree people deal with situations better than others under potentially stressful conditions,some people shine and others,well don't come back.

I would take kids to Glastonbury,there is loads for them to do and its nice seeing them running around laughing their heads off and generally having the time of their lives as well broadening their horizons and I think the festival would be the poorer without them,that's one of the things I love about Glastonbury the diverseness of all ages but that's when children will get something out of it,new born babies don't really,its a bit like christmas they only start to enjoy it when they get to a certain age.

So while they are too young, enjoy the freedom of a few days a year to let your hair down and take them when they can appreciate it,there'll be many more years. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I agree people deal with situations better than others under potentially stressful conditions,some people shine and others,well don't come back.

I would take kids to Glastonbury,there is loads for them to do and its nice seeing them running around laughing their heads off and generally having the time of their lives as well broadening their horizons and I think the festival would be the poorer without them,that's one of the things I love about Glastonbury the diverseness of all ages but that's when children will get something out of it,new born babies don't really,its a bit like christmas they only start to enjoy it when they get to a certain age.

So while they are too young, enjoy the freedom of a few days a year to let your hair down and take them when they can appreciate it,there'll be many more years. :)

Think u hit the nail on the head with this. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never taken a new born or been with people who have but I saw a couple this year with a new born and they were really struggling,the baby was crying,they were stressed,they weren't having a good time at all.

Obviously a baby is too young to appreciate a festival and I know it seems like a nice idea but I would agree with your husband.

It would be doable on a fair glastonbury but what about a really bad Glastonbury,that would be carnage.

I second that. Leave the babe in the loving care of somebody who is capable of that. Life can be hell there with a baby, unless you are lucky and have nerves of steel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I second that. Leave the babe in the loving care of somebody who is capable of that. Life can be hell there with a baby, unless you are lucky and have nerves of steel.

Except it is a bit difficult to leave a baby of 3 months with someone else for the 5 days (especially if it's being breastfed). Babies that age need to be with mum really. That's why we took our 5 month old in 2013 - it was either take him or don't go at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except it is a bit difficult to leave a baby of 3 months with someone else for the 5 days (especially if it's being breastfed). Babies that age need to be with mum really. That's why we took our 5 month old in 2013 - it was either take him or don't go at all.

Where u in a campervan or tent? How did u cope? The weather was a little mixed in 2013 if I remember rightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where u in a campervan or tent? How did u cope? The weather was a little mixed in 2013 if I remember rightly.

We were in a campervan. The weather wasn't too bad in 2013 - one muddy day I think. We had a good off road three wheel buggy which 'just about' coped on the muddy day (but really struggled in 2014's mud). We also took a carrier but didn't use it much. It was actually a bit easier than I expected it to be - at 5 months he couldn't crawl yet so we were able to just stop and sit with him lying on a blanket (when not muddy). Big crowds at night are tricky and best avoided if possible - we just stayed at the back of stages. We still saw music, but it does end up being a different sort of festival. He slept through both Chic and the Rolling Stones :)

As I said before, it was actually much easier when he was that small. We also took him in 2014 and found it much tougher, although a lot of that was due to mud!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said it will be much easier when the baby is 3 months old as they just eat, sleep, and feed. They are also much lighter so carrying them in a sling or similar will be much easier.

If you are breast feeding you obviously wouldn't be able to leave the child at home.

Our child was 8 months or so when we first took him, was 20 months this year and will be 32 months next year. Each time is a different experience. It is undoubtedly a different experience than going without child but still great. Some of my fondest memories are walking round at 5-6 am in the morning with our son speaking to all the randoms who are on their way back to bed.

Whilst I understand why people leave their kids with grandparents/carers for the weekend I couldn't imagine being there without our child. if you work you very rarely get to spend 5 full days with your child with nothing else to do but chill out, enjoy each others company and spend time with each other. For me this is more important than being able to stay out until 5am in the morning.

In terms of transportation we had one of these

http://www.amazon.co.uk/TecTake-Wagon-garden-trolley-platform/dp/B004ZKAVSW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1412671365&sr=8-2&keywords=kids+carts

Was fine in 2013, although didn't have too much rain. We got some memory foam to put inside, some solar powered fairy lights for when it got dark and our child slept in this. The benefit was when we got to the tent we just wheeled this in and left him asleep in it.

If you are bottle feeding we just took a wash bowl and used the sterilizing tabs. Had one load of bottles in whilst the others were in use.

In summary, it is definitely doable, I would recommend it, but it does take more planning, you have to accept you wont see everything you want, you might have to stand further away than you would normally do, not drink as much etc, etc. If you can accept this then go with, if you are going to feel like you are missing out then leave the child at home.

If you do take your child remember ear defenders for them.

Edited by cham08
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies. I'm not one to stay out till 5 am anyway. We normally end up back at camp (hopefully campervan field this time) after the headliner. Can't stay awake after 1am lol. I guess I'm going to have to see what kind of baby they are before deciding. ie good sleeper or not. And yeh love the little ear defenders! Have seen loads of kids with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My little boy has been three times, at the ages of 5 months, 17 months, and 4 years. My little girl joined us this year too - she had just turned 2. In terms of childcare, the first year was the easiest by far - no food worries (breastmilk), no toilet worries (nappies), no kid-running-off worries (couldn't crawl let alone walk). However, despite being much harder, this year (2014) was by far the most fun, and I can only see it getting better in future. The only bad part really was when we temporarily lost our son for about two minutes near the Other stage - that was absolutely terrifying.

We've done a scorcher (2010) and two muddy years (2011 and 2014) with the kids, and the muddy years were tough but the weather was harder work in 2010, when we spent 99% of the daytime trying to find shade.

We camp in Wicket ground - loads of space, toilets are clean, and quiet at night.

Obviously Glastonbury with kids is completely different to doing it on your own. There are massive compromises to be made, but you get to see it from a whole new perspective. For example, on Saturday this year the only music we saw was Metallica - the entire day was spent in the kidz field, the circus/cabaret fields, the green fields and the healing fields. We also spent a large chunk of the festival looking for dragons :)

Edited by Cheesey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have said it will be much easier when the baby is 3 months old as they just eat, sleep, and feed. They are also much lighter so carrying them in a sling or similar will be much easier.

If you are breast feeding you obviously wouldn't be able to leave the child at home.

Our child was 8 months or so when we first took him, was 20 months this year and will be 32 months next year. Each time is a different experience. It is undoubtedly a different experience than going without child but still great. Some of my fondest memories are walking round at 5-6 am in the morning with our son speaking to all the randoms who are on their way back to bed.

Whilst I understand why people leave their kids with grandparents/carers for the weekend I couldn't imagine being there without our child. if you work you very rarely get to spend 5 full days with your child with nothing else to do but chill out, enjoy each others company and spend time with each other. For me this is more important than being able to stay out until 5am in the morning.

In terms of transportation we had one of these

http://www.amazon.co.uk/TecTake-Wagon-garden-trolley-platform/dp/B004ZKAVSW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1412671365&sr=8-2&keywords=kids+carts

Was fine in 2013, although didn't have too much rain. We got some memory foam to put inside, some solar powered fairy lights for when it got dark and our child slept in this. The benefit was when we got to the tent we just wheeled this in and left him asleep in it.

If you are bottle feeding we just took a wash bowl and used the sterilizing tabs. Had one load of bottles in whilst the others were in use.

In summary, it is definitely doable, I would recommend it, but it does take more planning, you have to accept you wont see everything you want, you might have to stand further away than you would normally do, not drink as much etc, etc. If you can accept this then go with, if you are going to feel like you are missing out then leave the child at home.

If you do take your child remember ear defenders for them.

Cham did you go in 2014? I think given the weather conditions it would have been ultra hard with a baby and this is what would put me off. Fair play if you did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My little boy has been three times, at the ages of 5 months, 17 months, and 4 years. My little girl joined us this year too - she had just turned 2. In terms of childcare, the first year was the easiest by far - no food worries (breastmilk), no toilet worries (nappies), no kid-running-off worries (couldn't crawl let alone walk). However, despite being much harder, this year (2014) was by far the most fun, and I can only see it getting better in future. The only bad part really was when we temporarily lost our son for about two minutes near the Other stage - that was absolutely terrifying.

We've done a scorcher (2010) and two muddy years (2011 and 2014) with the kids, and the muddy years were tough but the weather was harder work in 2010, when we spent 99% of the daytime trying to find shade.

We camp in Wicket ground - loads of space, toilets are clean, and quiet at night.

Obviously Glastonbury with kids is completely different to doing it on your own. There are massive compromises to be made, but you get to see it from a whole new perspective. For example, on Saturday this year the only music we saw was Metallica - the entire day was spent in the kidz field, the circus/cabaret fields, the green fields and the healing fields. We also spent a large chunk of the festival looking for dragons :)

Sounds fab! To be honest my husband hates it when I get him moving around between stages. There days I'm quite happy sitting up by the stone circle for hours on end just relaxing. It's definatley not all about the bands for us. Just love the place so much, can't bare not to go especially after my hubby not wanting to go 2014. Id just love to be able to tell him/her how young they were for their first glasto!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i looked at loads of options to take a 1 year old this year and this was brilliant!!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Infantastic%C2%AE-FAH16-Dark-Purple-Trailer-Jogger/dp/B008USF0A4/ref=sr_1_6?s=sports&ie=UTF8&qid=1412676147&sr=1-6&keywords=bike+trailer

got her all the way back from pyramid after metallica to the furthest corner of the campervan field and she stayed asleep. powered through the mud and was a little safe haven for her when she just wanted to sit and play with her toys.

it feels safer than pulling something behind you too and no one can fall into them as it has 2 covers inc a waterproof one.

worth every penny and still getting use out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we brought our 8 month old the stimulation from everything around her for the week was amazing we found. She absolutely loved it. She loved being nosy and watching people do all sorts things around her. The colours; the lights; the sounds etc etc.........she loved it all. Her highlight as far as I could see was being surrounded by people in fancy dress and face paint, with fires, flares, bubbles, fairy lights, kids with glow sticks and torches etc etc at the Rolling Stones (I think she enjoyed that gig more than me! ;) )

The thing myself and the Mrs enjoyed about it so much was the change of pace we experienced to the previous Glastos we had been to when at times we would be trying to meet with mates and trying to see gigs, constantly checking the clashfinder and sometimes busting a gut to get across site for various reasons. But with the baby in tow a more relaxed, care free approach we both found we had, oddly enough. We just allowed the day to evolve and happen. I earmarked 1 gig I had to be at that week (Portishead) and the rest of the week just happened about us. As I mentioned before, it was a super Glasto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...