Peter Dow

[abdoujaparov]

I think I called someone a tit earlier on in another thread, this doesnt mean I think they are a huge disembodied wobbly fleshy boob with a typing wand strapped to it.

[russycarps]

I think it's safe to say your expert opinion isn't fairing too well either...

[eFestivals]

that I may be, but it's of more relevance to this debate than running a website

In the case of what you're commenting against, it's not - unless you've added both mind-warping and mind-reading to your claimed skills?

But oh, hang on ... you might have added those skills in your mind, but they're not working. What I meant with those words you've commented against is still the same as it ever was ...

...so your thoughts against my comment is of absolutely no relevance or accuracy.

Perhaps it was the same with Dow too?

Edited December 9, 2011 by eFestivals

[abdoujaparov]

I think it's safe to say your expert opinion isn't fairing too well either...

[abdoujaparov]

So after all this you turn out to be a jumped up caretaker

Priceless

[abdoujaparov]

In the case of what you're commenting against, it's not - unless you've added both mind-warping and mind-reading to your claimed skills?

But oh, hang on ... you might have added those skills in your mind, but they're not working. What I meant with those words you've commented against is still the same as it ever was ...

...so your thoughts against my comment is of absolutely no relevance or accuracy.

Perhaps it was the same with Dow too?

[abdoujaparov]

Lol

[kaosmark2]

It's fine...I know what I know and I'm happy to stand by my opinion. At least I'm capable of having an opinion that's based on some knowledge and dont resort immediately to juvenile name calling.

As I've said, it just may be that there is more to Peter than being a mentalist or a lunatic or any of the other terms people on here have used. You can accept that or not, but as usual when someone is expressing a view which you dont agree with, you resort to being abusive or just juvenile.

[abdoujaparov]

I don't think everyone's opinion but yours is founded on complete ignorance. (Barry's might be though )

[eFestivals]

Can you translate some of that into English?

put simply: please stop inventing bollocks from nothing and trying to use it as proof that you're right.

Dow might be choosing to swerve challenging the assumptions in all directions that people here are making of him (and who can blame him?), but I'm not going to do so with the completely baseless assumptions you might wish to make around what I say and think.

[abdoujaparov]

that's not entirely true, if we ever need an opinion on pushing pens around then we know exactly who to ask

[abdoujaparov]

put simply: please stop inventing bollocks from nothing and trying to use it as proof that you're right.

Dow might be choosing to swerve challenging the assumptions in all directions that people here are making of him (and who can blame him?), but I'm not going to do so with the completely baseless assumptions you might wish to make around what I say and think.

[eFestivals]

Contray to the experts presumptions it turns out I might have more real experience of the mentally ill... Other than pushing pens... But who knows...

As it turns out, I wouldn't be surprised if you do.

Your contributions here have at times showed a depth you rarely manage.

Edited December 9, 2011 by eFestivals

[abdoujaparov]

As it turns out, I wouldn't be surprised if you do.

Your contributions here have at times showed a depth you rarely manage.

[eFestivals]

in that case then I bow to Barry's obvious breadth and depth of experience

I didn't say it was great depth.

[kaosmark2]

Contray to the experts presumptions it turns out I might have more real experience of the mentally ill... Other than pushing pens... But who knows...

[kaosmark2]

Does anyone feel we bully Barry Fish? There's quite a number of threads where there's large numbers of people (myself included) deriding his opinion and calling him things such as 'idiot' 'moron' 'nutjob', etc. yet there's never been the same accusations as in this thread regarding Peter. I appreciate noone's called for Barry to be banned, but I can't see much else different, apart from the Condi jokes.

[kaosmark2]

I think put myself out there enough to expect some shit back . It's all good fun

[Peter Dow]

Seriously, you don't see the massive flaw in your 'democratic' logic here?

Edited December 9, 2011 by Peter Dow

[Peter Dow]

With the greatest of respect to Mr Dow, he clearly has mental health issues and I'm not sure that repeatedly poking him with a metaphorical stick is either productive or good entertainment...in fact, to my mind, it's starting to feel a bit like some good old fashioned bullying....

Edited December 9, 2011 by Peter Dow

[Peter Dow]

I'd imagine he is made up that his views are getting such a wide audience and that people are taking the time and trouble to discuss this with him. It's not a gang of people calling him a tit, its a gang of people debating and pointing out the flaws in his ideas.

Far from bullying from what I can see.

[Peter Dow]

Peter, do you feel we're bullying you, or are we just a load of ignoramuses who don't understand the true meaning of repulicanism, democracy and how awesome Condoleeza Rice is?

[Ed209]

Thanks Peter. That's that cleared up then.

[Peter Dow]

No, it takes someone in the campaign with some intelligence. I don't see George Bush having done much more than smile, wave, read a prepared script with some bumbling idiotic alterations.

[Peter Dow]

You're utterly wrong. Sad but true.

Edited December 9, 2011 by Peter Dow