Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

scottish fitba'


Guest ampersand

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I doubt very much that the SPL will get their 11-1 vote in favour of the proposed new set up as it effectively means 3 curret SPL teams will end up in the Div 1/ SPL2. In fact the only teams to benifit from the proposed changes are the bigot brothers :rolleyes: Early start to the season to help European form, more time for big money friendlies in USA/ Asia, winter break to avoid schedule build up plus 4 OF games a season... they'll be counting the money already!!

I hope the SPL clubs outwith the OF see sense and throw this pile of pish out onto the Scottish football scrapheap and come up with something different that benifits all clubs and not just the gruesome twosome

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I'd like to see 3 leagues with 16 teams in each, 1 or 2 automatic promotion/ relegation places and a play off system. Have the season kick off earlier in the year with some sort of winter break thing to avoid the fixture congestion and having to play re-arranged games on a freezing cold wet Tues or Wed night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I'd like to see 3 leagues with 16 teams in each, 1 or 2 automatic promotion/ relegation places and a play off system. Have the season kick off earlier in the year with some sort of winter break thing to avoid the fixture congestion and having to play re-arranged games on a freezing cold wet Tues or Wed night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Said it before and I'll say it again - an 18 team league will push clubs over the edge - swap 4 home Old firm games for 4 matches against Ross County and Queen of the South - thats the real reason why the 18 team spl will never ever happen (and it shoudnt)

They are always going on about these restructuring plans (that never come to anything) - they wont make a blind bit of difference. It wont make the league any more competitive or make the football better.

Edited by Snufflebutt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i disagree. top of first isn't hugely different from the lower spl. plus billy reids comments make sense. if you're not in a relegation battle (which a lot less teams will be), you're free to let more youth shine and improve the all round game in scotland.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jennings signed for Motherwell from Tranmere and the suspicions about the betting originated with a newly registered account in Liverpool.

He was sent off for abusive language and apologised to the ref and his team-mates after the match.

From that, I'm assuming the ref isn't under investigation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i disagree. top of first isn't hugely different from the lower spl. plus billy reids comments make sense. if you're not in a relegation battle (which a lot less teams will be), you're free to let more youth shine and improve the all round game in scotland.

Edited by Snufflebutt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

reducing to 10 would take away the ridiculous split. that's a good point. but i just think it's going backwards. from a fans point of view, i don't want to be travelling to peterhead twice a season. obviously the fans view counts for nothing when the decision is made though.

the best leagues in the world all have larger leagues. i don't think it's rocket science to suggest we should be following suit.

i couldn't comment on the mid table teams at the end of the season, as i don't see them. but it would take a whole lot of pressure off more teams.

and i completely disagree with the celtic/rangers b teams being in the lower leagues. what happens when they go on to win the 1st division/spl2. we just forget the relegation/promotion spots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they would get better, but would that improve the quality of the SPL? No, the TV money would just get spread more thinly, the overall quality would go down, and the fans would then say the answer is a 20 team league!

Remember, because the EPL has 20 teams its a sure fire winner!

Itas worth adding that leagues in countries the size of Scotland have around 10-12 teams. Switzerand is bigger, and has 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

The best leagues in the world are the best leagues in the world because they have money, not because of the number of teams. What are the 'best leagues in Europe'? England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy. Which countries have the biggest economies?

The point is, if you have 18 teams in the league, you threaten the very existence of the clubs. Travel to peterhead twice a season, or not have a team to watch - or a team anywhere near the standard that it is now? Dont believe the media, Scottish football is in pretty good shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Ah, that is interesting and ruins my theory a bit!!   I think my point just about holds though, and coming full circle on this discussion, being a sizable band such as Muse and not being able to sell out two O2 dates very quickly or at all doesn’t fill me with confidence that they be able to do a decent job selling a stadium tour…although maybe if Muse do something about their pricing, maybe they can!
    • I’ve said it elsewhere too but Emily Eavis said a 2028 headliner was booked, to me that’s only going to be someone the size of Oasis or Taylor Swift
    • Christ didn't even see that! 
    • It does feel very bland. It would certainly spell another year (my third, I think) away from Pyramid headliners for me. That doesn't mean they aren't worthy, though. I don't follow what any of them are up to, as it isn't my thing. Good luck to them.   You would think coming off a fallow year, they would want one big hitter. 'Big hitter' is obviously open to debate, but that was/is Madonna. Let's have it right. The eggs have gone in that basket, and it seems (as far the rumours go) that it's blown up. So now you're left with another plan B/replacement headliner.   I'm still of the opinion that Oasis will do it, before the Oasis thing is all said and done. Probably 2028, if they can come to an agreement. It may transpire that 2027 is bland (or at least to some of us), and 2028 is a bit... wild.   Again, though, none of us categorically know ANY of the headliners, as it stands.
    • Second go.....    Still f**king fantastic - Well done WIlliam Orbit -  Bugman & Trimm Trabb mega tracks - No Distance Left To Run hauntingly Beautiful  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...