Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2010-2011


Guest eFestivals

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • eFestivals

    2125

  • ampersand

    1135

  • The Nal

    1089

  • TheGayTent

    766

  • Admin

A tad harsh IMO. He may not be good enough for a team who have ambitions to win the top flight and challenge in Europe but he's easily good enough for a promotion chasing 2nd Division side.

Hmmm - I'd say it depends which version of him they've bought.

He'd got back to pretty decent form in his last season at Fulham, but that defo didn't transfer to Liverpool with him. I don't know how his loan spell (was it at Forest?) worked out.

He's got the potential to be "easily good enough for a promotion chasing 2nd Division side", but whether that's what Leicester actually get we'll have to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm - I'd say it depends which version of him they've bought.

He'd got back to pretty decent form in his last season at Fulham, but that defo didn't transfer to Liverpool with him. I don't know how his loan spell (was it at Forest?) worked out.

He's got the potential to be "easily good enough for a promotion chasing 2nd Division side", but whether that's what Leicester actually get we'll have to see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I think it's more than likely they'll get what he's been for the majority of his career - a player good enough for a mediocre mid table top flight side. Over 300 league appearances to his name.

At times he's been that "player good enough for a mediocre mid table top flight side", but not always. His form has dipped quite significantly at times.

He's a player I was impressed with at around the time he got his first England call-up - deserved at the time IMO - but that form didn't last. It was easy to see that it had fallen away quite a bit.

I'm guessing that there's an amount of self-interest in your support of him. Whether consciously intended or not, you do have a habit of posting in support of ex-Hammers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing that there's an amount of self-interest in your support of him. Whether consciously intended or not, you do have a habit of posting in support of ex-Hammers.

Edited by TheGayTent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I could suggest you have a habit of posting opinions about players you don't regard are good enough for your beloved Liverpool - but then I'd be wrong because you don't support Liverpool do you...

:rolleyes:

I can't remember ever making a post saying that a player isn't good enough for Liverpool - tho it's possible that it's happened.

But I do remember posting, against many people's opinions here that Konchesky wasn't good enough for Liverpool, that I felt he was. I wasn't lauding him as a fantastic signing or anything, but I was saying (based on the form he'd had at Fulham in the season before) that he was an alright buy at the price and a reasonable acquisition for a team in the position they were in at that time.

Still, you have managed to get one thing right here. I don't support Liverpool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But I do remember posting, against many people's opinions here that Konchesky wasn't good enough for Liverpool, that I felt he was. I wasn't lauding him as a fantastic signing or anything, but I was saying (based on the form he'd had at Fulham in the season before)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

One of my best mates at Uni is a big Fulham fan. He always maintained in that 2009/10 season that PK was the weak link in that side.

Perhaps he was. When I'd have been watching any Fulham matches I wouldn't have been thinking about things in that way.

What I did notice was that PK had managed to improve his form from what it had been in the year or more before up towards the better level he'd achieved earlier in his career.

I'm certainly not alone with that thought. I can remember reading a number of articles at around that time which were saying much the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

More amusement.

Something I haven't done. Something that you do regularly.

Yeah, it's all my invention, I've faked the stuff in my post at 3.14pm (/index.php?showtopic=148869&view=findpost&p=3665633">here), and you've not removed anything from your 2:23pm post (/index.php?showtopic=148869&view=findpost&p=3665578">here) which you edited at 3:18pm.

Oh look, here comes those rolly eyes at you yet again....

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's all my invention, I've faked the stuff in my post at 3.14pm (/index.php?showtopic=148869&view=findpost&p=3665633">here), and you've not removed anything from your 2:23pm post (/index.php?showtopic=148869&view=findpost&p=3665578">here) which you edited at 3:18pm.

Oh look, here comes those rolly eyes at you yet again....

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CMS is nothing like a Davies type player.

Though he did choose Brighton over us you're quite right. It appears the cheating fat man has moved on to DJC - who is more similar to CMS than Davies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not. As a posh fan I know exactly what type of player he is but you knock a ball over the defence he'll run onto it everytime over 90mins and get you goals. Kevin Davies played that lone striker role at Bolton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing the lone striker they both may have done, that doesn't make them the same type of player though as you said does it. They're completing different types of player albeit playing the same role, just as Slyvester McCoy wasn't the same type of actor as Jon Pertwee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite surprising. Hodgson obviously didn't think so, being as he picked him over 40 times in what arguably was Fulham's most successful ever season. Konchesky even played in the UEFA Cup Final that they only just lost to Athletico after extra time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to go back a page, I thought Konchesly was great at Forest. He bought proffesionallism to a young squad and could take the ball past a midfielder with ease at Championship level. He'll be a good signing for City, a bit on the pricy side at this level but that's the way the second division is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to go back a page, I thought Konchesly was great at Forest. He bought proffesionallism to a young squad and could take the ball past a midfielder with ease at Championship level. He'll be a good signing for City, a bit on the pricy side at this level but that's the way the second division is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Basement Jaxx 110 (-10) Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
    • What is too old for Leeds Fest now ?  I'm going to the Fontaines Saturday in a few weeks at 54 !!!  I may be the oldest there 🙂    Wythenshawe may be an option for WA.
    • Pretty much all festivals lose out on major artists because of production limitations though. Glastonbury is no different to most other festivals.  Lots of acts can/will adapt their tour production to suit festival stages if they want to play them, but some acts with stage designs and routines just don't want to adapt, and would rather just stick with a rigid, well-rehearsed production and take the money for their own gigs, whether that's a lot more than playing Glastonbury, or slightly less than playing some other festivals (but with added complications). Trying to adapt the stage, layout, access to b-stages etc to accommodate a single headliner on a Friday and then having to change it all around for a Saturday headliner isn't really a goer when most headliners can just easily adapt their show to stay on a main stage, if they're so inclined. They have a year to figure out how to perform a song on a main stage and ditch a few dance routines out on a b-stage if they really put their mind to it. It's not that difficult......
    • I would be all over Wolf Alice but may have outgrown this venue.    Also have to consider the schedule they have been on this year so may be on a break.  This last 10 days alone they did Tramlines, New York, Chicago and Kendal Calling.  Although make hay while the sun shines may come into play.
    • Basement Jaxx 120 Billy Bragg 90 Chase & Status 150 MAX CMAT 150 MAX  Confidence Man 140 David Byrne 150 MAX Everything Everything 130  Faithless 65 Fatboy Slim 100 Four Tet 130  Garbage 120  GOAT 30 (-10) Greentea Peng 125  Joy Crookes 110  Kneecap 115 Lorde 150 MAX The Maccabees 125 Nile Rodgers & Chic 150 MAX The Prodigy 150 MAX Pulp 150 MAX RAYE 70  Richard Ashcroft 110  Scissor Sisters 110  Self Esteem 140  The Streets 100  Super Furry Animals 100 Underworld 150 MAX Wolf Alice 150 MAX
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...