Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

MUSE....


Guest albert_hofmann

Recommended Posts

Neither U2 nor Muse are crap.... they are just not to anyone's taste.

If you can't articulate why you don't like a band than just keep your mouth shut, as the word crap is pretty meaningless.

The beauty of Glastonbury is that there is so much too see; If you don't like a headliner on the Pyramid, go and see something else on another stage. But be open also to the fact that you might actually be wrong!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muse = overated 'prog-dad-rock' dirge. The music is overblown and the audible asthmatic inhaling of the singer before each line is as grating as fingenails down a blackboard.

Suffice it to say, if they do play (and I'm still hoping they don't), I wont be subjecting my ears to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS

when did grammer matter in a forum post.?

even some of the nobs slating my grammer have spelling mishtakes

nowt rong wit my inglish an i got the eggsam cert 2 proof it....... full stop key works too.....

if u gonna av a go cos of my grammer and thats it then u can suck my root

a forum is a place to air ones own point of view and thats what i did

some ppl on here have been to muse gigs and are honest enough to say that it was crap and they aint going to watch them again

U2 are headlining and there are 100's of posts with ppl saying U2 are crap and they aint going to watch them, whats the difference.?

i think muse are crap, i dont understand the hype and why everyone is so excited and wants it that much, is all i said

there will be more room in the field for you muse lot

whilst i shall be tripping somewhere else.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to start on the grammar, but starting a sentence with "i no understand..." is never good.

You're right lots of bands could "have a far bigger playlist" i'm guessing by that you mean they have a bigger back catalogue? Muse, I think, have 6 albums more than a lot of recent headlining bands, Arctic Monkeys, Kings Of Leon etc and have more albums than a lot of legendary acts, The Smiths, Pixies etc. It's not quantity, it's quality and Muse are well known as a good live band.

P.S there are plenty of Muse threads, i'm not sure your opinions needed their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the big deal with muse playing/headlining....?

i no understand the hype and why so many people want them there

surely there are a 100 bands who could take the slot and have a far bigger playlist

for the record:

i dont like muse, i dont understand why so many ppl do

they sound just like any other modern indie group, nowt special

if they play i will be somewhere else

and if they headline it will be a waste of a slot

thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually cant wait to see them. Wouldnt advise going unless you're close to the front. Stadium gigs and being seated at Muse are a complete no-no ( I think along with all bands)

Ive seen these lads twice already and Im going to wembley next year to see them after Glasto.. Bellamy is a complete dick, yet he's is insanely awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS

when did grammer matter in a forum post.?

even some of the nobs slating my grammer have spelling mishtakes

nowt rong wit my inglish an i got the eggsam cert 2 proof it....... full stop key works too.....

if u gonna av a go cos of my grammer and thats it then u can suck my root

a forum is a place to air ones own point of view and thats what i did

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, of the several times I have seen muse they have always been a fantastic live band...I seen them about a week after springsteen while doing a tour...and they where phenominal for a band I had not heard much about before I seen them...Technically beautifully brilliant, and do have the tunes for a good crowd...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...