Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The example debate !


Guest ramragon

Recommended Posts

Some of you will realise this and some may not,and I ain't having a go at any one individual on these forums or anywhere else ,but a good proportion of people who go to festivals and make these comments don't know a lot about music or festivals,they only go because it's fashionable and the in thing to do,I've read comments saying "Example who's he" or "never heard of him" which I think just about proves my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will be loads more added, I would guess in the next month or so you'll get a daily breakdown by stage but it will be subject to change. I would guess a majority of the big names are out now but the card will be fill up a bit with up and coming acts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree with that, amazed me how many people posted "who ?", even if you'd hidden under a rock I'm sure you would have come across either his music or him on one of his numerous tv appearances before. I wasn't sure if it was people just taking the lash !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Must be me on my own perhaps but I think Example is a great booking. I'm not a fan but expect him to put on a great show and have my kids and wife dancing and singing along to finish our weekend on a high. Maybe not a James (probably unrepeatable) high but expecting more than a thoroughly disappointing Primal Scream closure last year.

No festival that only really tries to book 6-8 acts that are known/big? rather than up and coming will please everyone especially when the audience is so eclectic.

I'm a bit stunned to be honest that with the headliners being Suede, Turner and Example most of the grief seems to be about the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because of gorfields post I wondered what my first festival was . Having worked it out it was Phoenix festival in 1993 . I'm old . Gorfield why did you expect guitar bands at a festival which doesn't market itself as such ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hes ok. was hoping for so much better, seen him a couple of times at V and had the joy of taking my teenage daughter and her mate to see him at the M>E>N. Energetic and not bad tunes, but could have done with a nice indie close to the festival this year, saw James there a couple of years ago and that will stay with me for a long time!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is our first ever festival and yes I am a bit of an late bloomer. I am thrilled with the Example headliner this is awesome news because I was desperately disappointed with Suede I didn't like em back in the day.

Most of all I am looking forward to the atmosphere, the experience and the hangover.

They're miserable bug*ers on facebook anyway.

Peace n love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello daz and ourannie, welcome to the kendal forum.

You'll have a good time at kendal Annie, you've chosen a decent one for your first time, not too big to get around, decent line up in good surroundings. Once you've been to one it'll be a regular thing no doubt. Don't get too hung up on the main stage headliners, there's plenty of other stages and stuff to see.

I would have enjoyed an indie headliner or more of a legend for the Sunday as well, I've decided I'm probably gonna head for the calling out tent because either Jimi Goodwin or Frightened Rabbit are on, both much more my scene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite underwhelmed with the main stage as a whole this year. Maybe that's because I'm in my mid forties and hence out of touch but my kids, who'll be 18 and 15 by the time we get there, aren't that bothered about Example either. This'll be our 5th year there and we all feel this is the most low key line up yet. At least the kids are happy about Frank Turner but the missus and I have no interest in him at all.

They have plenty of customers my age and I think there's less for us old folks than usual. Let's face it, Suede weren't all that huge in their time either.

Rant over, I've loved the previous 4 years and I'll love this one too. Might try and reserve a table in Tim Peaks for the whole weekend. There's always been fascinating stuff going on in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...