Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Guest guypjfreak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 588
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Isn't music also something to do with age? Certain bands or songs will take you back to key times in your life or places where you first encountered that music.

I fell in love with this when I first went to France on a school exchange when I was 14. It was a life changing month for me. I discovered France, girls, wine, cigarettes and got away from my mum for a month.

I can't hold it up or claim it to be great music but it will always be a bit special to me because of the memories of that time of my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just seems strange that you admit to not liking 'difficult' music a couple of pages back, but like low, the second half of which is entirely atmospheric instrumental.

It just doesn't add up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, go to sleep, wake up in the morning, and it all makes sense. "Tom Waits and The Who aren't even in the discussion."

Edited by tonyblair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, i've always thought that. The age range when you are most open to devouring new things with extreme passion is 15-21, maybe even narrower. Out of interest, who is the band that means most to people and how old were you when you got into them? Not 'who is the greatest band ever?', but the one in your heart.

Mine is obviously Oasis, i was 16 when they hit me between the eyes. A friend at work says U2, he was 15. Another says Kraftwerk, in 75 he was about 15. Is this common?

Edited by tonyblair
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, let's see. Tom Waits and The Who aren't even in the discussion. The Smiths are out due to the appalling quality of the production on a lot of their stuff, casual fan though i am. I like Neil Young, and have recently started to delve deep into his stuff, but he's a no too.

I'm not a big fan of The Stones albums, Sticky Fingers aside, and think they are a singles band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of interest, who is the band that means most to people and how old were you when you got into them? Not 'who is the greatest band ever?', but the one in your heart.

Mine is obviously Oasis, i was 16 when they hit me between the eyes. A friend at work says U2, he was 15. Another says Kraftwerk, in 75 he was about 15. Is this common?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, Libertines. Not the greatest band by any stretch - but they were hugely formative to my yoof growing up in London. Was 14 when second album came out and it opened my eyes massively...hair grew long, jeans became skinnier, leather jackets were adorned and became a lot more open to people etc.

So yeah, not in the league of the greats, but a band I'll always hold close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there was lots of music I liked when I was 15 that I don't listen to any more. It's sometimes referred to as growing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a crack pipe constantly on the go beside your keyboard?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's how most people are I reckon. They have a band they associate with their youth and that band will forever be special to them.

what most people dont do, is then go on to claim that band is "the best band since the beatles", which is what this fellow has done with regards to oasis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like you, Big Joe. You speak with real passion about your favourite band, and that's real nice to see, and I like the way you present yourself on here. You've won me over.

Obviously you're a deluded fool spouting complete bollocks. But I've warmed to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like you, Big Joe. You speak with real passion about your favourite band, and that's real nice to see, and I like the way you present yourself on here. You've won me over.

Obviously you're a deluded fool spouting complete bollocks. But I've warmed to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

every once in a while i'll stick on Be Here Now for shits and giggles and i rarely ever make it past the first few tracks. it's just so... loud. cocaine set to music indeed

was back when a lot of bands seemed to think that filling a CD's run time meant a better album as well. so long. so tiring

Edited by FloorFiller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Tom Waits and The Who aren't even in the discussion". Not really an opinion is it Adolf?

Regarding Be Here Now. I stuck it on when I bought it in 1997 and was thoroughly bored of it by the following morning.

But I admire you're trolling. Starting to think its Mike99 in off season mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get you yeah. I love the first tune on the album. All Around the World ruined it though.

Funny. Ive watched all Back to the Futures and Godfathers in the last month. Great Sunday hungover stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've still only seen Godfather Part III once. Does it deserve the slagging its taken over the years?

And what about default films? The ones where you're flicking through the channels and stumble across them and think 'oh, go on then'. Cast Away and Crimson Tide are two i've lost count of watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cast Away!? Oh fuck no. Up there with my least favourite films of all time. A stinking turd from start to finish.

I thought we were going somewhere, Joe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...