Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Lock Up 2012


Guest jump

Recommended Posts

I disagree. When they split up they weren't that big, but over the 14 years they've gained ALOT of fans, and prettymuch 99% of those fans never got a chance to see them, so the demand will undoubtedly be high. They aren't massive for sure, definitely a "cult" band in a sense, but as I said as most of that cult following never got a chance to see them live they'll have a big draw.

They were definitely too high on the soni billing, but that was only because they got paid an arm and a leg for it to be their only UK show, where as now they'll probably be getting less, and will be further down the line up and probably won't be tied to DL as their only UK show, just festival.

Edited by kipper64
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 343
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But how much of that cult following would be at R&L, or would go to R&L just to see them? Maybe Soni/Download is a more natural home for them as it's where their fanbase is likely to be/go, and therefore where they'd get a bigger crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely, which is why they were mainstage at Sonisphere I guess. You wouldn't see Reading putting them that high up on a mainstage. They'd be lucky to get considered for high up NME. But anyways, I think now they'll do Download, a one off London date in July 8th (seeing as an inactive ticketweb link appeared on their tour dates but was removed), and possibly a secret set in the lock up at R/L's if they are about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how much of that cult following would be at R&L, or would go to R&L just to see them? Maybe Soni/Download is a more natural home for them as it's where their fanbase is likely to be/go, and therefore where they'd get a bigger crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which would have only been Reading and Leeds if it were a secret set. Seeing as Download managed to book them from Sonisphere Cancellation and it's on 'festival exclusive' terms.

In general they probably are on a level of someone like Thrice going by fans, but the reunion hype counts for a lot, and therefore (as you say) you get a bunch of people jumping on the bandwagon to an extent whether they were ever massive fans or not, and the real fans from all over the UK will want to travel and see them. Hence if it was their only UK show, and a comeback show, they probably could play somewhere like Brixton, but if it was a full UK tour, the venues would be smaller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two possibilities - the two festivals were Soni and R&L, but after Soni being cancelled Download have booked them and they are still to be announced for R&L (and Download are only playing the exclusive card to maximise sales until R&L announce them). The second is that the two festivals Neil heard about were Soni and Download and they were never going to play R&L, which is why Download now have them as an exclusive. The fact that they've been taken off the R&L rumours page would suggest that the latter is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two possibilities - the two festivals were Soni and R&L, but after Soni being cancelled Download have booked them and they are still to be announced for R&L (and Download are only playing the exclusive card to maximise sales until R&L announce them). The second is that the two festivals Neil heard about were Soni and Download and they were never going to play R&L, which is why Download now have them as an exclusive. The fact that they've been taken off the R&L rumours page would suggest that the latter is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah OK, in that case the the thing about the two festivals (or R&L being the second festival) must have been wrong (or was right but now Neil believes it to be wrong). If they were always going to be at R&L and they're just waiting to be announced why have they been removed from the line-up page?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah OK, in that case the the thing about the two festivals (or R&L being the second festival) must have been wrong (or was right but now Neil believes it to be wrong). If they were always going to be at R&L and they're just waiting to be announced why have they been removed from the line-up page?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just seems odd that even when Soni initially claimed them to be an exclusive he had them down for a second festival and thought it could be R&L, but now Soni's cancelled and Download announce them as an exclusive they're out of the picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish Neil would let us know what information he got that made him take them off the rumour page.

TBH trust in Neil not to just do that because DL said exclusive: Soni did before and he kept it, maybe DL really HAVE got the exclusivity. I fucking hope not though. His info may also be in regards to a possible UK show?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really wish Neil would let us know what information he got that made him take them off the rumour page.

TBH trust in Neil not to just do that because DL said exclusive: Soni did before and he kept it, maybe DL really HAVE got the exclusivity. I fucking hope not though. His info may also be in regards to a possible UK show?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw on another forum that Mike Davies confirmed, on Radio 1 last night, that the Lock Up will be annouced 2 weeks from yesterday, so on 17th April, anyone know if there's any truth behind this? Seems a bit early from my memory of previous years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Distortion at Rock En Seine on the Sunday, so headlining the Lock-Up Friday Reading/Saturday Leeds?

Mike Ness said on Mike Davies' show that they were coming over to the UK, but no UK dates announced as yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason for that is the guy that books the Lock Up stage has said before that he tried to get them but they were too expensive. It's possible that since they are already in the country in Aug maybe they would take less than what they wanted last time since they are not coming over just for R&L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason for that is the guy that books the Lock Up stage has said before that he tried to get them but they were too expensive. It's possible that since they are already in the country in Aug maybe they would take less than what they wanted last time since they are not coming over just for R&L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...