Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

So were The Libertines really worth it after all?


Guest lucastang

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

No but in The Libertines case yes. I like Frank Turner and I was listening to him since before Million Dead were (kinda) big and I wouldn't stop now that he's in favour with NME but the NME shovel so much shit in The Libertines favour and defend them to such pointless lengths that it's lost alot of the charm I found in the music especially when you talk to a random and they spout the same buzz words as the NME.

ps. I did write a longer post but couldn't be bothered to go down that route

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think they were too great but they were definately worth it.

It was one of the biggest bookings of the festivals last year and it was big news which is exactly what the organisers want. They want acts that will get them headlines and that's what they got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but in The Libertines case yes. I like Frank Turner and I was listening to him since before Million Dead were (kinda) big and I wouldn't stop now that he's in favour with NME but the NME shovel so much shit in The Libertines favour and defend them to such pointless lengths that it's lost alot of the charm I found in the music especially when you talk to a random and they spout the same buzz words as the NME.

ps. I did write a longer post but couldn't be bothered to go down that route

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing is you make it sound like a new thing, nme have always hyped bands up! isnt that the point of publications like nme, kerrang? its all aimed at teenagers who dont know any better and just getting into music, and who have just started to have a bit of spending money.

everyones all for strokes headlining, who were the most hyped band I can remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing is you make it sound like a new thing, nme have always hyped bands up! isnt that the point of publications like nme, kerrang? its all aimed at teenagers who dont know any better and just getting into music, and who have just started to have a bit of spending money.

everyones all for strokes headlining, who were the most hyped band I can remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me personally it was defiantly worth it, as I was down at the front surrounded by people all around me having a great time singing along to the Libertines playing classic tunes. And the plus side being since I was down the front anyway I ended up being on the bar for the Arcade Fire which was an Epic experince.

So from a personal point of view, yes, yes they were worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a great time watching them followed by the amazing Arcade Fire.

And I dont really get the NME argument. They did the same with the Sex Pistols, Suede, The Strokes, Arctic Monkeys and many other bands that people hardly moan about. Yet because Pete is a bit of a dick (which is most peoples reasoning for Libertines hatred, lets face it) people HAVE to be so against them.

If you have objections to the music then you're within your right to dislike them. But lets not get into the age old argument of hating bands because of their endorsement from the NME. I love the band for the way they revolutionised the music scene and how stale post-britpop, dull anthemic rock and the like was pushed away from the mainstream in favour of bands like The Libertines.

Now, I admit I do have my complaints. For example, its not exactly the ideal setting considering the band is better suited to this kind of setting:

But, come on guys. Lets be a little more adult about this sort of thing and discuss music on its MUSICAL merits, not peoples personal hatred based upon how many front pages of the NME a band gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NME reminds me of a sad twat in a club, the guy that always goes "look at that girl she is well fit & cool" and when he goes to talk to her and she rejecs him he then starts labelling her as a minging slag he wouldn't f**k 2 secs later. They hero worship and then throw a strop but they never stop hero worshipping when stropping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yeah, I think it's important to differentiate between a stage that's just a platform for the artist to walk on (which can be assembled fairly quickly and without too much difficulty), and the custom staging that you get in big productions where there's a whole world underneath.   Using the Eras tour as an example the stage extending out into the stadium field has all sorts - lifts that go up or down - down most importantly as this allows performers to enter or to leave the stage as needed. There's passageways to get from one part of the stage to another. There's what are effectively dressing rooms set aside for costume changes. There's spare instruments (and techs to look after them) so if something goes wrong above they can be swapped out in the space of seconds. There's even a track and dolly system running the full length of the stage so that Taylor can be moved from one end to the other faster than she'd be able to walk.   I don't know the specifics of the Madonna tour to the same degree but my understanding is that a lot of the same techniques are used.
    • Wow just got myself some Megadeth tickets and not sure I can afford another set of tickets for another gig so soon but we'll see. Fingers crossed
    • Can't speak for Dua Lipa's, but Coldplay's was vastly scaled down compared to their stadium production staging though, and tracks were adapted to reflect that. MOTS tour had a full walkway 30m out to the B-Stage in the middle of the crowd, and two C-Stages. Glastonbury didn't accommodate that at all and just had a very small walkway in front of the Pyramid stage, and (IIRC) a disconnected B-Stage.   Which re-enforces my point. Acts can adapt their stage shows if they really want. Most do, some don't want to. Glastonbury might miss out on the odd act that doesn't want to slightly adapt, but so will most festivals.   
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...