Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Going alone? post here


Guest skatalite

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep I'm going alone.. well kinda, I know various groups who are going, but none of them especially well... camping with an old school friend who always goes on his own, so at least I'm not gonna be struggling to pitch a tent on my own!

But as it's my first glasto, wanna enjoy the experience to the full, which I think will be best if I can just do what I wanna do :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i went last year solo and it was brilliant. met up with several randoms. nothing to worry about. you;ll have a good time.

i'll be arriving solo this year too but 2 other friends will supposedly be on site. previous yrs i would arrive solo but meet up with a few others on site. i come from the US each time, so it's a bit of a pilgrimmage for me (this will be my 5th) but i always have some of my english mates going it seems.

even when i'm there with others, i'm quite insistent that we split up to go see our own things, esp as tastes differ.

biggest stress for me about going solo... I'm a 'city boy' who is shit at putting up a tent. just cant do it. i show up with a tent that i've bought the day before in London (in the midst of an all day session) or in NYC the day of my flight over, and so i end up putting on my american accent asking for help from stewards or neighbors in putting up my tent, and sounds like a complete idiot, especially as i arrive on site and first thing i do is drop my stuff off at a lockup & have a few drinks, just to take it all in, rather than immediately set up tent.

i met an Efester last year for first time at the bar left of pyramid who invited me to the pennards party, but didnt do actually go. so, i've missed the meetups (i arrived on Thursday midday, hard to take as many days off when you're flying from the US and want to have a good night out on Wednesday in London with old mates). this yr i'm determined to make a E-Fest meetup and meet some of these screen names.

i just hope one of you volunteers to help me set up my tent on thursday this june!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be going on my own as well. Person i usually go with is going to work abroad so i'm on my tod. I'm looking to camp with the fellow efesters although i have never met any of them before. Going to be coming down from London and would be up for a travelling companion(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im debating to go alone from swansea it was my first time last year with my gf and we booked to go again this year but now we have split up. i really want to go and iv payed my deposit im but am debating whether to risk it i just cant see it being the same on my own my mates have registered but theres slim chance of them getting tickets id say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im debating to go alone from swansea it was my first time last year with my gf and we booked to go again this year but now we have split up. i really want to go and iv payed my deposit im but am debating whether to risk it i just cant see it being the same on my own my mates have registered but theres slim chance of them getting tickets id say.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been going for nearly 20 years now.

The last two years I've been solo, but because I've camped at the unofficial efests camp site, it hasn't felt like I was alone at all.

Being solo has a lot advantages over going in a group.

Anyone coming for the first time on their own, you have nothing to worry about at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been on my own twice before. I wouldn't say it was better than going in a group, but it was definitely just as much fun!

I'm shamefully bad with tents - on both occassions my neighbours immediately offered to help me after seeing my struggles. People are much more friendly when you're on your own - I had my (stranger) neighbours bringing me 'breakfast in bed' from their campstove - bless! Never get this when I'm in a group. It also really forces you to socialise, and actually you get to feel much more of the 'glastonbury spirit', in the camp site and at the stages - everyone loves a stray!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go for it bud, you'll be sorry if you don't go when your watching it on tv...you'll be kicking yourself for the rest of the year i tells ya, maybe for years after... :P ...lol.

I'm sure you won't be on your own for long, you'll always be welcome to pop over the cv fields to see me and my mate for a natter and a beer or 2 like.... :P ...

And the forum lot will be there somewhere, plus it seems quite a few people will be going alone, and i'm sure their will be a meet or summat... just go for it fella. like i said, you'll be sorry if ya don't...

Ant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to turn this in to a "where to camp" thread, but being a first timer going on my tod trying to get as many different camping viewpoints as poss... where was so shit and why? TVM :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright ppl

First time for me at Glastonbury this year, have been to Leeds, T in the Park before but really looking forward to Glasto.

Unfortunatly my mates bailed and i was thinking of giving up my ticket but after reading these forums its changed my mind - seems there are a lot of people in the same boat, would be ace to meet up/camp with festival goers from efestivals, hopefully we can get something sorted :P

Cheers

Woody

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...