Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2011 Flashmob!


Guest Ian_Mackay

Recommended Posts

no by failure I mean a couple of hundred people standing around watching a complete fook up, despite months of preparation.

It would have been miles better if just him and his mates turned up and did it on their own, like most people do at the stone circle. Rather than having it swarming with idiots all holding their iphones aloft to record a "glastonbury moment".

It's not a glastonbury moment, it's shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

this was the most self indulgant cringeworthy threads leading up to the festival. This Ian fellow clearly just wanted to get a nice video to put on facebook to show all his other braying buddies just what a "character" he is.

I'm laughing my tits off that it was a predictably abject failure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no by failure I mean a couple of hundred people standing around watching a complete fook up, despite months of preparation.

It would have been miles better if just him and his mates turned up and did it on their own, like most people do at the stone circle. Rather than having it swarming with idiots all holding their iphones aloft to record a "glastonbury moment".

It's not a glastonbury moment, it's shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did anyone do a headcount? I've seen it described as 1000's and now 100's. It looked like about 27 and a load of others wandering up to see what the fuss was about.

I don't want to upset the Ministry of Organised Fun, honestly I don't, this is as far from my cup of tea as it gets, but consider for a second that you'd had a long day, perhaps the people you'd travelled with had forced you to listen to Elbow on repeat all the way there, and you just wanted half an hours relaxation at the stone circle, and then all of a sudden, a few dozen people arrive to fill your head with THAT song again!!

DAMN YOU SINGALONGERS MASQUERADING AS A FLASH MOB!! THATS REALLY F'd UP MY DAY!!

Would you not feel a twinge of guilt for making an innocent fellow festival goer's experience just a shade worse? Can you wear the guilt lightly on your shoulders as you dream up next years 'Flash-hugathon'? I hope so, because you drove a young man with Australian style hair and 'muddy' pants (lets hope it was mud) to breakdown!! Everyone assumed it was the drugs, but no, he just couldn't take THAT song again!! 'If only they'd sung one of the less popular, yet infinitely better Elbow songs' he thought before he really cracked and went on a rampage.

Hmmmm, can you live with that Ian?? Can you??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

............but consider for a second that you'd had a long day, perhaps the people you'd travelled with had forced you to listen to Elbow on repeat all the way there, and you just wanted half an hours relaxation at the stone circle, and then all of a sudden, a few dozen people arrive to fill your head with THAT song again!!

DAMN YOU SINGALONGERS MASQUERADING AS A FLASH MOB!! THATS REALLY F'd UP MY DAY!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can confirmt here were a few hundred people there. Most of them already there at the SC and got up to wander over to see what everyone else was doing. Only about 20-30 people were actually singing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still feel sorry for the poor theroetical chap though.

OK, you sold it to me. Well, almost sold it.

I still object to it being referred to as a Flashmob when it clearly wasn't. It was a gathering. there seemed nothing flash about it. It looked the opposite of flash in fact. A casual ambling towards the gathering at best. Can next years hugathon please have a little more thought put into its description please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it was defo not very "Flash"........I do believe the description is not doing it any favours.........It was very much a bunch of people having a sing song.

Classic Flash Mobs when done correctly change the environment they take place in instantaneously..........

This had the feel that people were hanging about for it and meeting up for it........and then it simply kicked off......

This is a real Flash Mob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all that in hindsight it wasn't really a flash mob.. very little in the way of sudden arrival or dissipation of crowd, and a sing/jam- along would probably have been a better description, it's true. We didn't want to orchestrate something so formal that it required pre-gatherings where everyone practised in advance as a group, and trusted to luck on what would happen.. And the crowd in the end dictated what happened by gathering in the way it did.

Flange, we had no expectations on how many would turn up - if it had been just us we'd have had a good time anyway, we were just happy to see those that wanted to did join in, and have had many people saying that they had a great time - for us that meant it was a success, and I hope more people left smiling than disappointed or depressed about it. I met at least 15 people beforehand who had brought along instruments and played along, and I think the number of singers who actually sang was a bit higher than Oddone's estimation (who by his own account could only hear muffles from the back).. The 1,000s figure I think came from the BBC Radio 6 guys (Guy Garvey in an interview said there were 5,000, which proves he wasn't there!) - these things get exaggerated, but the important thing is lots of people with no prior expectations ended up having a good time, even if those further out probably felt like watching Radiohead from the back of the park.. something was going on, but couldn't see or hear what it was..

Anyway, I'm done with the debate - it was what it was and we enjoyed it - thanks again to all who joined in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and that's why I'm glad that this was more just a sing song. So what's the guy done so wrong? He called it the wrong thing? I don't think it's hard to imagine that if even only 20-30 people start singing a festival anthem at the stone circle that others might join in. It is hardly his fault that there was a wall of people who couldn't manage to sing and hold a phone at the same time between those who joined in properly, and those who might've if their way wasn't blocked by these numbskulls.

I looked at the instructions and the map, decided it was way too complicated, and just sat near the top end of the stones and looked out for something starting. When I saw it, I moved forwards and got involved. It didn't just land in my lap as I sat in position as many might've hoped, but joining in really wasn't difficult. As a result I really enjoyed it.

(EDIT: started typing this after the T mobile clip)

Edited by amfy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no issue with a gathering of 20 - 30 people.

I'm naturally predisposed to not liking organised fun like this. Don't ask me why, I just feel uncomfortable with it and a bit odd that other people like it. Thats not a criticism.

However, I'm also predisposed to poking a bit of light hearted fun at stuff as well.

So, I took the mick.

Don't get so precious over it everyone.

Can anyone confirm if the rendition of Hey Jude that seemed to kick off was any fun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no by failure I mean a couple of hundred people standing around watching a complete fook up, despite months of preparation.

It would have been miles better if just him and his mates turned up and did it on their own, like most people do at the stone circle. Rather than having it swarming with idiots all holding their iphones aloft to record a "glastonbury moment".

It's not a glastonbury moment, it's shit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spy with my little eye something beginning with......£100 pair of hunters wellys.

Nevermind the flashmob, you should get on to the phone to Norris McWhirter, you have absolutely smashed the "biggest collection of hunters wellys, rugby shirts and chinless wonders in one place" world record.

DEDICATION THAT'S WHAT YOU NEED

Edited by danbailey80
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
    • We had a really good weekend this year. This was our 2nd year after giving it a go last year with 3 year old twins (we do Glasto but don't take the kids and have no plans to in the distant future!!).   Highlights of the weekend for me was Peter Hook & the Light, English Teacher, Flaming Lips, Adult DVD and Alex James (I get the karaoke thing but I still thought it was great). Missed loads of acts we wanted to see due to having two kids in tow but overall we left happy with what we managed to see across the weekend. Some great food vendors, good to see Steak Frites make an appearance this year, one of my faves from Glasto. Festival is really well run, toilets remained clean and stocked with loo roll all weekend, even on Sunday night/Monday morning. The walk from the cars is a ballache but it is what it is, arriving Thursday evening meant we were parked as far away as you could be.   My only gripe is that there seems to be a trend of parents letting their teenagers camp completely separately to them in family camping. We had a large group of 15-17 year olds near us who came home pissed up every evening at 3-4am being really loud and annoying! I get that it's a festival etc but I think it's taking the piss a bit letting your kids camp separately and disrupt everyone else.   All in all we had a really good time and are looking forward to next year.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...