Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

world cup


Guest Kill

Recommended Posts

That applies to music too, if you like grass roots why are you going to the worlds biggest festival where the headliners get £100,000's for a few hours work?

And i go and watch my home town team in the conference when the premiership rapists, bullies, drunk drivers and other assorted c**ts that i support are away from home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 794
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To see people here defend ashley cole, john terry, rio ferdinand et al is horrific to witness.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

spot on.

And to see people in this thread holding them up as some kind of saints is sickening. I guarantee you very, VERY few of them do a single thing for charity, and what they do do respesents a microscopic proportion of their grotesque wealth. There are exeptions, but they do not feature for the england team.

To see people here defend ashley cole, john terry, rio ferdinand et al is horrific to witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spot on.

And to see people in this thread holding them up as some kind of saints is sickening. I guarantee you very, VERY few of them do a single thing for charity, and what they do do respesents a microscopic proportion of their grotesque wealth. There are exeptions, but they do not feature for the england team.

To see people here defend ashley cole, john terry, rio ferdinand et al is horrific to witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My view is that if a person's a rapist or a drunk driver or whatever, that's a matter between them, their victim, and the courts. As a public, we should expect that justice be done, but once it is done, that should be an end to the matter.

(Yes, it bothers me that Pete Docherty gets a slapped wrist and a spell in a comfy rehab hospital, for crimes that would get the rest of us a couple of months in the slammer)

If David Bowie got done for murder, did his time, then came out and played Glastonbury, I'd watch him.

If you go to the circus tent and see the circus act you've ever seen in your life, it's entirely possible that act has a rape conviction. You don't know because they're not famous enough for it to make the papers. And it shouldn't matter. It's a matter for the justice system.

So some top class footballers have personal failings. They are also brilliant footballers, and let's not forget that this, and the fact that millions of people love to watch football, is the reason they're rich.

(FWIW league football doesn't appeal to me all that much -- I watch Leamington FC in the Southern League, and England internationals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, fair enough, i understand that, I recognise it's my problem, that I don't feel that the Englasnd team is 'my' team, they have no connection to me, they don't give a stuff about me, and I don't want them representing 'me' (whatever I mean by that). I wish I could get over it, but I just can't, I've found it an increasingly huge stumbling block recently.

That's where it's different to bands & music, I think, the idea of it being mine, or representing me, or sharing in the success or whatever

I'm really enjoying this thread, giving me lots of food for thought, I hope I'm not coming across as antagonistic or contrary, but I enjoy discussing this sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as a coda to that, on a personal level, not beeing able to enjoy this kind of football any more has left an enormous empty hole in my life, it's f**king shit that I feel this way, it really is. It was part of my life, amd meant such a lot to me for so long...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

most premier league footballers have clauses to do a certain amount of community and charity work writen into they're contracts.

I dont think anyone is treating them like saints but at the end of the day the world cup is the biggest sporting event in the world and it matters to alot of people and there will be alot at glastonbury who feel like that. personally i think being able to watch our national team on big screens in a field with 60000 all cheering for the same thing would be quite an experience and one i'd be happy to be a part of

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, fair enough, i understand that, I recognise it's my problem, that I don't feel that the Englasnd team is 'my' team, they have no connection to me, they don't give a stuff about me, and I don't want them representing 'me' (whatever I mean by that). I wish I could get over it, but I just can't, I've found it an increasingly huge stumbling block recently.

That's where it's different to bands & music, I think, the idea of it being mine, or representing me, or sharing in the success or whatever

I'm really enjoying this thread, giving me lots of food for thought, I hope I'm not coming across as antagonistic or contrary, but I enjoy discussing this sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spot on.

And to see people in this thread holding them up as some kind of saints is sickening. I guarantee you very, VERY few of them do a single thing for charity, and what they do do respesents a microscopic proportion of their grotesque wealth. There are exeptions, but they do not feature for the england team.

To see people here defend ashley cole, john terry, rio ferdinand et al is horrific to witness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're other argument is that they don't fit in with the charitable side of the festival, even though they do far more for charity then me you or the majority of people on here are probably done. Yours, mine, everyones on here's good intentions, morals etc are great and valuable to the charities but ask person who doesn't receive money because the charity doesn't take money from footballers or other 'horrible' people if they would prefer to have a roof over their head or our good intentions to keep them warm & safe then I think you can probably work out what they will say.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect, you have absolutely no idea whatsoever what charitable endeavors I have taken part in so that is not a useful statement. You do not know what proportion of my life I have spent doing "charity" but I can guarantee you it is a far larger proportion than any of these footballers. I may not be able to afford to chuck a few grand here and there but I have dedicated a sizeable chunk of my LIFE to causes which I have no intention of going into detail about here. Real, genuine time. Not signing a few cheques or having my photo taken at a kids hospital.
Edited by 42-shades
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find football at the highest level obscene. To me, they are the absolute representation of the gulf between the rich and the poor and I dont want them at glastonbury, any more than I want coca cola or mcdonalds sponsoring the pyramid stage. Those two companies also donate an awful lot to charity you know, does this make them any less abhorrent?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think any of the rape charges, videos of "roastings", drunk driving charges, assault charges, adultery etc etc etc and other accusations level at the footballers in this thread are presumptions. They are all undenied facts. The vast salaries are not assumptions, they are facts.

Do you see?

Edited by 42-shades
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But this is not every top flight footballer, yes some have done the above, others accussed. But thats in every walk of life regardless of how over paid they are. Do you think they wouldn't have raped anyone if they had two left feet and were working in a factory? I think it goes a bit deeper than being able to kick a ball and being rich.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think any of the rape charges, videos of "roastings", drunk driving charges, assault charges, adultery etc etc etc and other accusations level at the footballers in this thread are presumptions. They are all undenied facts. The vast salaries are not assumptions, they are facts.

Do you see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has everything to do with the vast sums they earn, their lack of education and the fact they are surrounded by people who treat them like gods.

They believe they can do whatever they like, that they are above us mere mortals, above the law. Hence the horrific behaviour we witness. Of course it has EVERYTHING to do with the money. Do you think the same proportion of firemen, or teachers, or accountants behave in this way? of course not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has everything to do with the vast sums they earn, their lack of education and the fact they are surrounded by people who treat them like gods.

They believe they can do whatever they like, that they are above us mere mortals, above the law. Hence the horrific behaviour we witness. Of course it has EVERYTHING to do with the money. Do you think the same proportion of firemen, or teachers, or accountants behave in this way? of course not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

putting everything to one side for one moment I take issue with this point.

With respect, you have absolutely no idea whatsoever what charitable endeavors I have taken part in so that is not a useful statement. You do not know what proportion of my life I have spent doing "charity" but I can guarantee you it is a far larger proportion than any of these footballers. I may not be able to afford to chuck a few grand here and there but I have dedicated a sizeable chunk of my LIFE to causes which I have no intention of going into detail about here. Real, genuine time. Not signing a few cheques or having my photo taken at a kids hospital.

I find football at the highest level obscene. To me, they are the absolute representation of the gulf between the rich and the poor and I dont want them at glastonbury, any more than I want coca cola or mcdonalds sponsoring the pyramid stage. Those two companies also donate an awful lot to charity you know, does this make them any less abhorrent?

Edited by DreadlockDan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think any of the rape charges, videos of "roastings", drunk driving charges, assault charges, adultery etc etc etc and other accusations level at the footballers in this thread are presumptions. They are all undenied facts. The vast salaries are not assumptions, they are facts.

Do you see?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...