Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

world cup


Guest Kill

Recommended Posts

I am going with a group of 10 and can say with certainty that if England were playing most of our group would be watching without any doubt. If you don't lke football don't watch it. It's Glastonbury like everyone has said, there will be a million other things to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 794
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

so if they decided to show an important bullfight on the screens at the pyramid field at the request of the spanish glastonbury goers would you support this?

After all, you wouldnt want other peoples prejudices determining what they can and can't enjoy, would you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so if they decided to show an important bullfight on the screens at the pyramid field at the request of the spanish glastonbury goers would you support this?

After all, you wouldnt want other peoples prejudices determining what they can and can't enjoy, would you?

Edited by General Lee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok, change bullfighting to fox hunting then.

Soon to be legalised again by the incoming tories and with the sky high prices of the festival these days and the rch folk this has brought with it, I am sure there will be many thousands of people there would would love to view this spectacle...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's ridiculous. A 'sport' which glorifies the killing of animals. How are you drawing a comparison here? Even you know you are taking the piss and purposely being out of context.

Whatever this debate, the football will (and should) be shown. Were you up-in-arms about the rugby last year too? Are they better role models because they don't earn as much money as footballers? (Though if any of the full on fights, stamps, eye gouging, cheating etc that goes on in the 'gentlenman's game' of rugby happened in football they'd be national outcry).

I don't like rugby, but I couldn't care less if they shown it last year - I was somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do appreciate what Russy is saying and respect his opinion, and in an ideal world, Twat Batter would schedule in a break in the fixtures for Glasto weekend, but there really is so, so much to see around the site. Some of the 'acts' who have played on the main stage over the years have been dire, but the site is so big that you can escape ANYTHING.

With regards to the atmosphere afterwards, I really can't envisage any problems, especially if it's a group match. Even the total w**kers that are a cancer on the game shouldn't react in the ways Paul witnessed in 2004 in that circumstance.

Anyway, I love football, and I love Glastonbury. Part of the reason I love both is to get together with some mates and enjoy their company. So the footy on the big screen at Glasto with my mates? Hell yeah - bring it on! Can't wait!! Now - Group E or F please, Twat Batter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know much about The Rolling Stones/U2/David Bowie so wont comment.

I do know that The Rolling Stones/U2/David Bowie etc are among the most pampered, preening, grotesquely overpaid, vain, spoilt, adulterous, abusive, disrespectful, self centred, conceited, arrogant, prima donnas on the face of the planet. And the thought of seeing the likes of them on the big screen of the pyramid stage alongside the banners of Greenpeace, oxfam and wateraid makes my want to vomit.

Modern day pop stars are the symbol of everything that is wrong with the world today. £100,000 a week frauds on the big screen alongside pictures of people dying due to a lack of water. What a ghastly juxtaposition, and one that has no place at glastonbury.

Edited by Buddhafish
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know much about rugby so wont comment.

I do know that the england football team are among the most pampered, preening, grotesquely overpaid, vain, spoilt, adulterous, abusive, disrespectful, self centred, conceited, arrogant, prima donnas on the face of the planet. And the thought of seeing the likes of them on the big screen of the pyramid stage alongside the banners of Greenpeace, oxfam and wateraid makes my want to vomit.

Modern day footballers are the symbol of everything that is wrong with the world today. £100,000 a week frauds on the big screen alongside pictures of people dying due to a lack of water. What a ghastly juxtaposition, and one that has no place at glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do know that the england football team are among the most pampered, preening, grotesquely overpaid, vain, spoilt, adulterous, abusive, disrespectful, self centred, conceited, arrogant, prima donnas on the face of the planet. And the thought of seeing the likes of them on the big screen of the pyramid stage alongside the banners of Greenpeace, oxfam and wateraid makes my want to vomit.

Modern day footballers are the symbol of everything that is wrong with the world today. £100,000 a week frauds on the big screen alongside pictures of people dying due to a lack of water. What a ghastly juxtaposition, and one that has no place at glastonbury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know much about rugby so wont comment.

I do know that the england football team are among the most pampered, preening, grotesquely overpaid, vain, spoilt, adulterous, abusive, disrespectful, self centred, conceited, arrogant, prima donnas on the face of the planet. And the thought of seeing the likes of them on the big screen of the pyramid stage alongside the banners of Greenpeace, oxfam and wateraid makes my want to vomit.

Modern day footballers are the symbol of everything that is wrong with the world today. £100,000 a week frauds on the big screen alongside pictures of people dying due to a lack of water. What a ghastly juxtaposition, and one that has no place at glastonbury.

Edited by DreadlockDan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would hazard a guess that the entire england football team has donated almost certainly more money and a reasonable chance of donating more time to charity than you have.

I don't know you though so could be wrong, but you're making assumptions about people you've never met; from information your seen or heard provided by the press who are there to sell papers and advertising and make cash so I dont see why I can't make assumptions about you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If U2 play i won't be watching them. There is a rumour going around that if they headline there will be some other stuff on too, so im planning on seeing what that is.

The same may happen if they show the football. Go fish.

Edited by jontosh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has turned into a really interesting thread, from a fairly dull initial premise. Nice one people.

My thoughts: I love football, love it as a game, love lots of things about it, but at the same time despise the big money, the 'f**k the fans' mentality of modern corporate football. I can't, in my heart, follow England or a large professional club any more, I'm not going to cheer on rapists, bullies, drunk drivers and other assorted c**ts who have no concept of real life. The spirit, and all that's great about football isn't in the premiership, it's in grass roots stuff, it's in AFC wimbledon, FCUM and other places where fans aren't treated as sheep to be fleeced and the players and teams have a connection with the supporters and the community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has turned into a really interesting thread, from a fairly dull initial premise. Nice one people.

My thoughts: I love football, love it as a game, love lots of things about it, but at the same time despise the big money, the 'f**k the fans' mentality of modern corporate football. I can't, in my heart, follow England or a large professional club any more, I'm not going to cheer on rapists, bullies, drunk drivers and other assorted c**ts who have no concept of real life. The spirit, and all that's great about football isn't in the premiership, it's in grass roots stuff, it's in AFC wimbledon, FCUM and other places where fans aren't treated as sheep to be fleeced and the players and teams have a connection with the supporters and the community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has turned into a really interesting thread, from a fairly dull initial premise. Nice one people.

My thoughts: I love football, love it as a game, love lots of things about it, but at the same time despise the big money, the 'f**k the fans' mentality of modern corporate football. I can't, in my heart, follow England or a large professional club any more, I'm not going to cheer on rapists, bullies, drunk drivers and other assorted c**ts who have no concept of real life. The spirit, and all that's great about football isn't in the premiership, it's in grass roots stuff, it's in AFC wimbledon, FCUM and other places where fans aren't treated as sheep to be fleeced and the players and teams have a connection with the supporters and the community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • In August 2009, in his Spectator blog he wrote about Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour Party, in unflattering terms. Liddle began the article by asking: "So — Harriet Harman, then. Would you? I mean after a few beers obviously, not while you were sober."[27] Tanya Gold wrote in The Guardian that Liddle had delivered a "tissue-thin polemic." Pointing out that it was The Spectator's cover story that week.[28] Rachel Cooke in The Observer nearly two months later recalled finding Liddle's piece "disgusting"[29] Cooke went on to say: "I would still like to do something really unpleasant to the man who wrote [the article]." Liddle said two months later that the Harman column "was supposed to be a parody of guttural, base sexism", a joke he assumed readers would understand. After the negative response from Gold (and then Cooke, among other female journalists) he continued: "And then I suppose I came to the conclusion – gradually – that I must have got it wrong."[30] In June 2014, he said that of those he had offended, Harman was the one person to whom he would apologise.[31] In November 2009, again for The Spectator website, he offered "a quick update on what the Muslim savages are up to," a brief article about the stoning to death of a 20-year-old woman in Somalia after she was accused of adultery, and the similar death of a 13-year-old the year before. He made remarks, considered sarcastic, that read: "Incidentally, many Somalis have come to Britain as immigrants recently, where they are widely admired for their strong work ethic, respect for the law and keen, piercing, intelligence."[32][33] In December 2009, on his Spectator blog, Liddle referred to two black music producers, Brandon Jolie and Kingsley Ogundele, who had plotted to kill Jolie's 15-year-old pregnant girlfriend, as "human filth" and said the incident was not an anomaly. He continued: When he was accused of racism, Liddle said he was instead engaging in a debate about multiculturalism.[35][36] In March 2010 the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint against Liddle, who became the first journalist to be censured over the contents of a blog, because he had not been able to prove his claim about the crime statistics.[37] After the publication of London crime figures in June 2010, The Sunday Telegraph suggested Liddle was largely right on some of his claims, but that he was probably wrong on his claims about knife crimes and violent sex crimes.[38] In October 2010, Liddle called for the abolition of the Welsh language TV channel S4C as a result of the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. In his article for The Spectator, he described Welsh nationalists as "miserable, seaweed munching, sheep-bothering pinch-faced hill-tribes".[39] On 23 May 2013, Liddle wrote about the murder of soldier Lee Rigby near the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, London. In the original version of a blog article for The Spectator, he referred to the perpetrators as "two black savages".[40] After many objections to his language use,[41] this phrase was modified.[42] Liddle apologised.[40][43] Giving a speech at Durham University in December 2021, Liddle said: "It is fairly easily proven that colonialism is not remotely the major cause of Africa's problems, just as it is very easy to prove that the educational underachievement of British people of Caribbean descent or African Americans is nothing to do with institutional or structural racism."[44] Independent editor rumour and Millwall supporters' website The Guardian reported on 8 January 2010 that the expected purchase of The Independent by Alexander Lebedev, a Russian billionaire, would be followed by the appointment of Liddle as editor.[45] Roy Greenslade wrote on 11 January that the reports were provoking a "major internal and external revolt" by The Independent's staff and readers.[46] The stories about Liddle's posts on Millwall Online apparently further reduced the likelihood of his being offered the job.[47] Finally, on 19 February, Stephen Brook of The Guardian reported that Liddle was no longer in the running for the post.[48] Tim Luckhurst, professor of journalism at the University of Kent, argued that Liddle's prospects of editing The Independent were nullified "by the people behind a viciously intolerant campaign of liberal bigotry".[49] In January 2010, the press drew attention to allegedly racist and misogynist comments posted under the username "monkeymfc"—a name Liddle has used—on Millwall Online, a fan club web forum with no official connection to Millwall Football Club. Liddle attributed some of the comments to opposition fans logging in under his name to embarrass him. He later said he had written some of the posts that were being criticised, including one in support of the BNP excluding Black and Asian people from the party.[50] Another post, in which he joked about not being able to smoke at Auschwitz,[51] led to his being asked to explain what he meant in The Jewish Chronicle.[47] While he said in June 2014 that his comments were taken out of context, he said that he did not regret making them. "No. Never. Absolutely not. I thought about my mates at Millwall Online, God I respect them so much more than these other people, these ghastly f**king people."[31] Stephen Lawrence, disabled and transgender people In November 2011, an article by Liddle for The Spectator suggested the trial of two men accused (and later convicted) of murdering Stephen Lawrence would not be fair.[52] It was referred to the Attorney General Dominic Grieve by the judge for possible contempt of court,[53] and he ordered the jurors not to read it. Having decided that it might have breached a court order, Grieve passed the case on to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Director of Public Prosecutions.[54] The decision that The Spectator was to be prosecuted by the CPS for breaching reporting restrictions was announced on 9 May 2012, with a court hearing scheduled for 7 June, although Liddle as the author was not himself liable for prosecution. Fraser Nelson, the magazine's editor, announced that the prosecution would not be contested,[55] and the magazine pleaded guilty at the hearing. The fine was £3,000, plus £2,000 compensation to Stephen Lawrence's parents and £625 costs.[56] In January 2012, Liddle wrote that many people in the UK were "pretending to be disabled" in his column for The Sun,[57] an opinion defended by James Delingpole.[58] Frances Ryan in The Guardian accused him of "belittling something that on a daily basis affects real people" who can be "a huge benefit to society. Maybe for a month Liddle would like to try that."[59] In May 2015, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) upheld a complaint from Trans Media Watch that Liddle had been discriminatory towards Emily Brothers, a blind and transgender Labour candidate at the 2015 general election, in two Sun columns published in December 2014 and January 2015. In commenting in the way he had Liddle had breached two sections of the editors' code.[60][61] Column on poppers and gay sex During a parliamentary debate on the Psychoactive Substances Bill – which "makes it an offence to produce, supply, offer to supply, possess with intent to supply, possess on custodial premises, import or export psychoactive substances"[65] the Conservative politician Crispin Blunt admitted he used poppers: Liddle responded in his Spectator blog: The satirical and current affairs magazine Private Eye described this as hypocritical, pointing out Liddle's account in The Sunday Times of using Viagra in July 2004.[68][69] A spokesperson from the LGBT rights charity Stonewall said of Liddle's remarks: "Comments like this are shocking and damaging, but we wouldn't expect anything less from repeat offending bigots like Rod Liddle."[70] Column on Muslim voters In October 2019, Liddle penned a column in The Spectator commenting on the forthcoming December 2019 UK general election, which suggested that the election should be held on a Muslim holy day to reduce the Labour vote. The column was criticised by senior political figures including Chancellor of the Exchequer Sajid Javid and former Conservative Deputy Prime Minister David Lidington. Liddle defended the content as being humorous. The article also criticised the Labour MP Rosie Duffield's recent speech about her experience of trying to exit an abusive relationship; Duffield described the article as "racist and misogynistic".[74]
    • A true social democrat
    • I thought the same thing I thought when Baresi went which is there sure is a hell of alot of people who don't make the new pension age.
    • 1, The Menzingers- Everything I Ever Saw 2, Quicksand- Bring On The Psychics 3, Radkey- Bedroom Sand  
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...