The Conspiracy Theory Thread

[LondonTom]

Debunking the Debunking of the Flat Earth Theory:

http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=58309.0#.VmX6QNWLSUm

[eFestivals]

Your post reminded me that George Monbiot has recently met the nutter who phoned me up a while ago...

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2015/dec/04/the-contrails-conspiracy-is-not-just-garbage-its-letting-aviation-off-the-hook

(meanwhile I've seen Scottish indie supporters reject Monbiot as a tory stooge, in favour instead of a mate of Prince Charles :lol: )

Edited December 8, 2015 by eFestivals

[eFestivals]

and just for fun, here's some conspiracy nuts - Anonymous - that are claiming that ISIS are actively working with Israel to carry out Israel's agenda. :o :wacko: :lol:

http://anonhq.com/this-is-huge-evidence-builds-linking-israel-turkey-to-isis/

No feckin' wonder the Syria debate is awash with fruitcakes spouting such gross idiocy.

[Spindles]

I watched soaked in bleach yesterday, sure Courtney lied, but I still see no conspiracy myself.  If you take evidence of people saying someone didn't seem depressed as being worth listening to you clearly have no experience of understanding depressed people.

[eFestivals]

just digging around on look-up.org.uk I came across this, which particularly made me laugh as they once 'outed' me on 'fakebook'....

Quote

Fakebook – as we now like to refer to it

The reason we reverted to this way of working was that people complained that they simply were not seeing anything we posted on Fakebook. Fakebook even admit now that they only allow us to reach about 16% of our followers, but on really important things nobody saw them at all from what we could gather. We hired some clever people to analyse the behaviour and reach of our posts and they concluded that algorithmic restriction had been put in place to restrict the reach of our posts to just a few people, a small group of subscribers, and it was normally the same people every time. We also suspect some, if not all of those people are operatives who regularly like our material to ensure we think we were getting an audience, whereas almost nobody was seeing the material at all. So we decided to use our own blog instead as the primary portal, and feed others from there. We are currently setting up subscription to it directly, but the best way to get round all this for now is to check into our pages on whatever forum you prefer. If you do that you should, in theory, see everything we post.

It's a conspiracy if no one believes your twaddle, clearly.

Edited December 8, 2015 by eFestivals