Lost Vagueness Vs. Shangri La

[Kaye]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2008/feb/29/festivals.news

As I didn't go to Glastonbury in 2008, I didn't get to sample the 'new zone' which replaced Lost Vagueness, Shangri La. I always used to love the late night shenanigans at Lost Vagueness, does the new zone offer the same? Or, is it better?

If I recall correctly, the chapel used to be in Lost Vagueness, has that gone too or can you still get married at Glasto?

[Aphex's twin]

IMO it's better.

[Pinhead]

All gone, but now 100% better. Some bar venues remain, however the church is not one of them.

[Mardy]

Much much better now

[Petewasbristol]

Yep, much much better. LV felt tacky to me, Shangri La feels more comfortable and well run

[Mardy]

SL feels like a natural part of the festival. It's a great addition

LV was a bit 'look at us, we're much cooler than you saps'. Except it was trying that bit too hard and ended up looking a twat.

[robith]

I only went for the first time in 2007, so I don';t know how great LV was "back in the day".

However from my experience

Shangri-La and Trash City>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>LV

I went to LV and people seemed to just turn up and expect to be entertained and then go "Oh, nothing's going on"

In the new places everyone was going nuts

[shangri-la_steward]

come say hi

[Insomaniac]

The loss of Lost Vagueness is no great loss.

Trash City and Shangri La are much better improvements.

[Kaye]

All gone, but now 100% better. Some bar venues remain, however the church is not one of them.

[ding dong]

Trash City and Shangri .. MILES ahead and better run .. great team of bods in charge now.