Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

MCR


Guest Welshyyy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 330
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with that point completly, I loved Blink182 last year and the build up and the type of bands that played underneath were all suited. From Limp Bizkit upwards was brilliant, Weezer Paramore and Blink182 to top it off.

Same for G'N'R, Biffy and QOTSA, but who on earth would suit MCR? Good Charlote? It would be such a depessing day. They would need to have some good bands undernath to even make the main stage sound medioca anyways!

Who would Sub and be on the same day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just really regret not going to Reading '04... 50 Cent looks like he get annihilated on the youtube videos.

MCR definitely got bottled when they played after Fightstar but I think most ammo was wasted the set before on Charlie.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha i must be one of the only people that hant seen them yet! but i hav heard good thing accept them making the crowd sing half there set, i still dont think they are big enough to sub yet tho. i think they would be good third from top on the mcr day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id put 30STM under Muse everyday of the week, would be a great end to the day.

Maybe bands like You Me At Six, All Time Low, Lostprophets(Again?!), Sum 41, Billy Talent, House Of Pain!, Good Charlotte?

I could see those been tossed into the mix but thats very similar to last year! I mean its far easyier to find bands thats support The Strokes in there type of genre. Vampire Weekend, The View, Libertines (I missed out last year, I went for CC and Enter and then stayed for Pendulum because im quite the fan lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that would be you me @ 6, lostprphets and billy talents 3rd year in a row tho...House of pain would go down well tho in limp bizkits slot from last year .. i could see pendulum playing on the mcr day maybi 3rd down

Exactly, there dosent seem to be any flow if MCR headline! It would all just be a mix match of bands from all genres which means moving about a lot if you a festival goer. Leeds try and put acts that fit well together. Aracde Fire day last year had a very very indie sound to it all day except Dizzee Rascal who was god dam awful and i left after three songs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, there dosent seem to be any flow if MCR headline! It would all just be a mix match of bands from all genres which means moving about a lot if you a festival goer. Leeds try and put acts that fit well together. Aracde Fire day last year had a very very indie sound to it all day except Dizzee Rascal who was god dam awful and i left after three songs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly, there dosent seem to be any flow if MCR headline! It would all just be a mix match of bands from all genres which means moving about a lot if you a festival goer. Leeds try and put acts that fit well together. Aracde Fire day last year had a very very indie sound to it all day except Dizzee Rascal who was god dam awful and i left after three songs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was f**king sick! Good history with R+L too could make him a potential headliner in the future. Reading was the best out of his Glasto & Bestival sets. There were mosh pits cropping up past the mixing desk. Although I was severely hammered so judgement may be skewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, I think it detracts from a day if there's a 'flow' of bands that suit each other. If you don't like that music then it pretty much takes a whole stage out for a whole day. If the main stage was something like MCR, 30STM, Lost Prophets, Good Charlotte, You Me @ 6 and All Time Low I'd be as far away as possible. I think festivals should mix it up a bit.

Edited by mrtourette
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's already headlined Global Gathering & Beach Break Live... plus subbed Pyramid stage at Glastonbury. But yeh probably V.

Offspring will need a new album out & be good to get anywhere near subbing these days. Could even see them headlining Lock Up but might be too big (feel free to disagree with me on that, but I can "imagine" them playing in that sweaty tent at night).

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...