Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Nitrous Oxide


Guest rubenz

Recommended Posts

..and yet the picture on the box just says "take me" ;)

I don't particularly like n2o, on the basis of it being classed with glue/gas/solvent sniffing in my mind. Last year it was MUCH more prevalent than this year and it wasn't quite the sea of whippets we 'enjoyed' walking on last year thankfully.

I camp in undleground and on monday mornings when green crew are moving out the tatters start moving in, last year some really nasty ass lads arrived and were huffing nitrous like nobodies business and the more they did, the more aggressive they became (not something I associate with having a good time) until eventually they were battering each other and the fight spilled into our area. This kind of person, this kind of behaviour only helps to reinforce my negative viewpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..and yet the picture on the box just says "take me" ;)

I don't particularly like n2o, on the basis of it being classed with glue/gas/solvent sniffing in my mind. Last year it was MUCH more prevalent than this year and it wasn't quite the sea of whippets we 'enjoyed' walking on last year thankfully.

I camp in undleground and on monday mornings when green crew are moving out the tatters start moving in, last year some really nasty ass lads arrived and were huffing nitrous like nobodies business and the more they did, the more aggressive they became (not something I associate with having a good time) until eventually they were battering each other and the fight spilled into our area. This kind of person, this kind of behaviour only helps to reinforce my negative viewpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow it's a lot worse for the atmosphere than one would assume.

I hate how you see the metal containers everywhere, why don't people clean up after themselves.

Never tried it myself but I don't like the sound of it as the high I believe comes from a lack of oxygen to the brain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK can't find the original article that I was looking for but have tried to recreate it below with references to validate the calculations...

When you inhale N2O it is minimally metabolised therefore virtually all of the gas you inhale is exhaled. Nitrous oxide is a particularly nasty greenhouse gas, with 275-300 times the warming potential of carbon dioxide (reference - United Nations Environment Programme), note the particularly long atmospheric lifespan, any N2O added to the atmosphere now will be there for around 114 years, compare this to 12 years for Methane and several months for CO2.

N2O chargers are freely available, I've calculated everything below based upon a standard box of 24 chargers...

24-cream-chargers-3-p.jpg

Assuming each charger contains 8 grams of N2O, this means a box of 24 contains 192g of N2O (24 x 8g), and because it isn't metabolised, virtually all of it is released in to the atmosphere. So, using just one box of chargers adds the equivalent of 52.8kg of CO2 to the atmosphere (192g x 275 - N2O is at least 275 times more atmospherically damaging than CO2).

So to put this in to perspective, 52.8kg of CO2 is the equivalent of...

~52 kWh of electricity generated from coal fired power station

About a third of the UK energy requirement is provided by coal-fired power stations, which are the most polluting kind in use in the world today. To generate a single kWh of electricity about 1kg of CO2 is released in to the atmosphere (reference - UK Parliament). Therefore, the 52.8kg of CO2 equivalent from the box of N2O chargers is around 52kWh of electricity. That's the equivalent of boiling over 430 litres of water with a really inefficient kettle (reference - Which?). If your energy is being generated from a more carbon efficient source then it could be two to three times that amount of energy!

Driving 280 miles in my car

I've got a reasonably economical car, which emits 119g CO2/km. This means that I can do the entire round trip from my village in Northants to Glastonbury emitting less than the 52.8kg CO2 from one box of chargers.

...So just one charger of 8g is the equivalent of boiling 18 kettles or driving 11.5 miles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'm not saying it caused that behaviour, I'm saying that it attracted that sort of person and this has led to a negative association for me.

I would be a hypocrite to complain about substance abuse, however I have observed that a certain type of person is attracted to certain substances, take stella for example, I'm sure lots of people have an association there with a certain type of person.

I am sure that there are people I'd get on just fine with who enjoy a bit of nos, however it's not for me personally (just trying to get across that I am not generalising)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get what you are saying.

And although, this will sound really bad...I couldn't give a monkeys nut about the effects on the environment, I am more concerned as to how it will effect me. Sure, Cows give off a lot of f**king methane, that helps deplete the "Ozone". Should Eavis stop milking the cows? It is one of those things that is going to happen either way, the world wont be destroyed by greenhouse gasses or ozone layer shite, it will be a war or a natural event such as a meteor/astroid(not sure which one is the right one) colliding with us.

To be honest, after reading this I am seriously considering selling at next years fest.

Edited by Happy Chappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine, as the dispenser is not illegal to own, that they will just take it off you and let you enter still. Although having said that, a quick browse on Wikipedia says this:

"Nitrous oxide is entirely legal to possess and inhale in the United Kingdom, although supplying it to others to inhale, especially minors, is more likely to end up with a prosecution under the Medicines Act"

Make of that what you will. If you get caught selling them then you will definitely lose the dispenser and your entire stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine, as the dispenser is not illegal to own, that they will just take it off you and let you enter still. Although having said that, a quick browse on Wikipedia says this:

"Nitrous oxide is entirely legal to possess and inhale in the United Kingdom, although supplying it to others to inhale, especially minors, is more likely to end up with a prosecution under the Medicines Act"

Make of that what you will. If you get caught selling them then you will definitely lose the dispenser and your entire stock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can really trip on nos if you inhale and exhale until you can't do it any more, it's kind of scary in an addictive way. If you aren't stuck in your head hearing a noise repeating itself and feeling like your head is going round and round lots, you're doing it wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can really trip on nos if you inhale and exhale until you can't do it any more, it's kind of scary in an addictive way. If you aren't stuck in your head hearing a noise repeating itself and feeling like your head is going round and round lots, you're doing it wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they banned NOS at the Sunrise festival this year partly on environmental grounds - all those little cannisters are a bugger to clear up - though i understand they have a considerable scrap value - 50p each, I heard.

Sunrise is quite a family friendly festival and several hundred people lurching around uncontrolably wasn't considered too socially responsible.

At Sunrise the security were searching for Glass and NOS exclusively.

If Glastonbury wanted to ban them, they could. Its up to the festy organisers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok so if i wanted to take, say 1000 of these 'whippets' in to the festival next year, would the nazi security guards have any right t5o confiscate then from me?

Edit: didnt see previous posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you aren't stuck in your head hearing a noise repeating itself and feeling like your head is going round and round lots, you're doing it wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
    • David Byrne’s obviously got a few hits to play, but he’s not cheesy enough for the Legend Slot. Other headliner perhaps?
    • Too good for the legends slot 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...