Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

World Cup 2010


Guest Cardboard Box City

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
My hands are up for Fabio being a vast improvement. AND for Neil being on a wind-up.

a "vast improvement" would have England as finalists!!!

My take has England getting no further than the semi's at very most (on the basis that I've said Pat is better via subs).

It's your take that's the wacky one, not mine!

As the finals will prove! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a "vast improvement" would have England as finalists!!!

My take has England getting no further than the semi's at very most (on the basis that I've said Pat is better via subs).

It's your take that's the wacky one, not mine!

As the finals will prove! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody really care if Barry is fit, and he is included in the squad ?

On SSN they are saying our chances are resting on the fitness of somebody who had an awful season at City and was a £18m flop. He isnt one of the two best CM in the country. And if he is, well that really does say it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody really care if Barry is fit, and he is included in the squad ?

On SSN they are saying our chances are resting on the fitness of somebody who had an awful season at City and was a £18m flop. He isnt one of the two best CM in the country. And if he is, well that really does say it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Yeah, cos resources within the England squad are to a minimum. More to the point, do you know anything about the way those clubs played under Capello?

For national teams, they are at a minimum. It's not like you can just go out there and get the players who play in the way you want them to play. You can only pick players from that nation, and it's not necessarily the case that the best players will make the best team - and that's England.

Nope, I know zilch about Pat in other jobs, but that doesn't stop me seeing that he's done no better with England than Sven managed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
this!

Nope, this:-

a "vast improvement" would have England as finalists!!!

My take has England getting no further than the semi's at very most (on the basis that I've said Pat is better via subs).

It's your take that's the wacky one, not mine!

As the finals will prove! :)

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Would this be the Sven that walked us in to every final tournament he managed us for? He's certainly done no better than that, no.

Yep, Sven "walked us in to every final tournament he managed us for", yet still had the players underachieve and showed he had little idea outside of putting the players on the pitch and telling them to play.

Pat is no different to that - tho he's more able to see how come it's not working and change it for the better. The "better at subs" thing I've already mentioned.

The problem is tho - and why I'm not seeing Pat as any better - is that he still thinks that putting out those same can't-really-do-it players again and again is going to come right, when it clearly isn't. It's still just about all the same players (don't forget, Beckham would be there if not crocked), and he's still not worked out how to play Lumpard and Gerrard, tho he's found a way to make them less bad . Etc, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Yep - should have been the Stones.
    • Yeah I do agree on the 2 hour thing. But if they were subbed by Biffy/WA only doing 75 mins or so would be doable.   Only reason I suggested them was because we know they're back doing shows here next year. 
    • Its probably the culmination of issues that have been simmering under the surface for a while. Spain ran a regularisation program recently that allows undocumented individuals to obtain temporary legal status and then a route to EU citizenship. 1.2 million applied. At the same time Montenegro is having to close its citizenship via investment program as part of EU ascension talks.    Countries are obviously asking, why are we having to reject investors whilst others can wave anyone in?
    • I'm not sure, they aren't giving any headliner in that format 2hours and Foos would have at least 2. I wouldn't say Reading is likely for them next year either. If they are as said going big on a tour with stadiums and festivals then the UK is once place they can definitely do stadiums and that would rule them out. And that's even if they come back for a second UK stint as I fully expect them in Europe from very early. That could be seen as hyperthetical but there are is some places I cannot see them not doing from history.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...