Foxy Knoxy

[Langdale Wolf]

Yeah. It's like saying be my bitch. My female dog tries to hump things, as a show of dominance.

[feral chile]

I can reach a lot of things with this tongue. It's very flexible. Ever since it was ripped off and sewn back on, it has amazing powers of elasticity.

[oafc0000]

You would be BRILLIANT in the courtroom.

[llcoolphil]

Not this "earth", this country.

And this is a republican belief that has been held since the word republic came in to use. I think most people wouldn't exactly find this either racist or nationalist.

In fact I would, as a student of political theory, be very insterested in how this is a show of outright nationalism as opposed to liberal nationalism or anything else given that I am not defining Britain as an ethnic identity. Do enlighten me.

[oafc0000]

A straightforward yes or no will suffice

[strudders]

I think it proves the point though dosent it... An offensive word / phrase will not always be taken that way and can be used in humour...

[oafc0000]

It does not though.

the word Bastard has many uses, from the feather of a bird to a baby born out of wedlock.

[llcoolphil]

Maybe for you but I think most people recognise its more of a complicated question.

[oafc0000]

I thought you were going back to ignoring me and not posting. You appear to have failed on both of these idiot boy

Edited December 7, 2009 by oafc0000

[Kowalski]

Please also do not forget about it being another word to describe "sir" Alex Ferguson!!!

[Cardboard Box City]

Look it doesn't matter what constructed concept you attach to it - republicanism, nationalism, liberal nationalism, none of that is important.

[llcoolphil]

I really should do... It is not like we are going to get anything out of you except hate filled rubbish...

[oafc0000]

You keep saying we, yet not a single poster has backed you up, though several have laughed at you and ampersand agreed with me that we'd get on again next time we met, just as we always have. So stop trying to big yourself up with all these PMs you apparently get but that nobody wants to admit too.

[llcoolphil]

Yes it is. You chose to describe my views as nationalism. Which is a rather interesting interpretation.

These concepts explain how the political entities around us operate based on their beliefs.

I believe in liberalism, and I believe in the rights of the citizen and the citizens right of collective sovereignty.

[llcoolphil]

Your really do live in a bubble...

Anyway, your on ignore now... I know that wont stop you and your hate but it at least reminds me not to bother replying...

[Rufus Gwertigan]

No I live in a flat. Though I am virtually self reliant emotionally

[Cardboard Box City]

No for the purposes of my point, it genuinely doesn't matter what label you assign to something - it is about the attitude that lies behind it.

Edited December 7, 2009 by Cardboard Box City

[feral chile]

Main Entry: carpet muncher

Part of Speech: n

Definition: a lesbian

Etymology: 1992

Usage: derogatory slang

My own view on this is as follows:

If I called a homosexual man an arse bandit? poo pusher? would that be acceptable. No. Its offensive and derogatory and not acceptable

Why then should we use language that is as offensive as the above to describe sexual contact between homosexual Woman.

Because we are men is the term less offensive?

If a straight woman said it would it then be acceptable?

Of course its not.

The fact people do not see the problem is the problem. If you think the term is not offensive to any number of people then you need to look at what language you use.

Now I am not saying anybody here is homophobic what I am saying is that phrases and saying used in jest that are derogatory to a minority or a majority should be kept in check so as not to blatantly offend people.

What you do in your own home is up to you but the fact that a joke is made regarding the incarceration of a murderer and her sexuality due to circumstance is a little worrying, regardless of how hot people think she is.

Just my humble blind opinion

Back on track, she was an odd ball if you ask me. there is mention of drugs... do we know what sort? just seems odd that the first guy jailed was there for a drug deal??? and then ended up with the death of a girl during sex play.

[oafc0000]

It's hardly meant as a hate filled rant against lesbians. Though it could be termed offensive in the same way as other testosterone-fuelled laddish behaviour could be.

Edited December 7, 2009 by oafc0000

[feral chile]

It was not meant as a hate filled rant against lesbians and if any lesbians has been offended then please let me know and I will give you a heart felt apology. Like wise, if certain people just like to use it as a tool to beat me with and show little interest in the OP then they will go on ignore.

[-pogo-]

I can see both sides to it. I don't think calling people names is constructive, because if someone knows they're not a hater, they're just going to dismiss the message along with the messenger.

From a feminist perspective, you could take offence at the whole thread if you wanted to be picky. reducing women to sex objects indeed! Where's the thread on tasty deadly males then?

[llcoolphil]

It's hardly meant as a hate filled rant against lesbians.

[feral chile]

As a feminist, you could point out that the opportunity to make threads on tasty deadly males exists on these forums, just like it does to make threads on tasty deadly females. It's all about equality of opportunity, innit?

[llcoolphil]

As a feminist, you could point out that the opportunity to make threads on tasty deadly males exists on these forums, just like it does to make threads on tasty deadly females. It's all about equality of opportunity, innit?

[minute5072]

tch! Spotted the flaw in my argument there, didn't you? There aren't any tasty male killers.