Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Spiringsteen


Guest Iain333

Recommended Posts

Tempted to not step into the fray with all the shit flying around but here's my tuppence worth. They should have had Bruce on Friday and Neil Young on Saturday because Mr Young was so unutterably immense that there was no way on God's earth that anyone could measure up. I left Bruce after 7 songs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 912
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Admin
if you'd been more 'pleasant' about it, I wouldn't have got as wound up as I did. It is possible to debate oposing view without being abusive.

Look, please go back and read my first posts in this thread (they start on page 5) and then try telling me that they were anything but pleasant. I was perfectly pleasant and reasonable at the start. I only got abusive as a result of others being abusive. So you need to be telling them that it's perfectly possible to debate opposing views without being abusive, and then things like this won't happen. And perhaps remind yourself of your own suggestion too, eh? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
I'm sorry dude but "all this" can be attributed (largely) to you. Yes there are other Springsteen-haters on here who've made their feelings quite clear on occassion; particularly in response to the admittedly OTT fervour of some Bruce fans. But for going on 5 months now, you've never missed an opportunity. Any time the word "Bruce", "Boss" or "Springsteen" is in a thread you just know a side-splitting quip (complete with smiley faces) won't be far behind.

you'd have a point if you were correct. You're not, you're a very VERY long way from being correct. Just for you - :lol:

:D

You can talk all you like about buying his record, giving him a chance blah blah blah...end of the day, you don't like the cat. Fair enough. But why be a dick about it?

if certain Bruce fans hadn't been dicks about it then you'd have seen nothing similar from me. Yes, it really is that simple. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could be bothered, as far as I can tell it wasn't there. Now I'm not as fast and loose as throwing the 'liar' word around as you but maybe if you could just back up what you're saying.

After all, it seems to be what you're asking other posters to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1) At this stage of the conversation/argument/lunacy it is frankly not enough to say "you'd have a point if you were right" which, if you think about it, is just about the most dumbass comment to make anytime ever.

perhaps. Tho I'd say it's just as dumbarse to accuse me of doing something I've not done, and then you'd never have had to have seen those words. :P

2) I've just read my previous post back and I shouldn't have called you a dick. I've said before your info is (for obvious reasons) invaluable on here (made my day when you "broke" the Springsteen news: your finest hour!!!). I genuinelyt didn't mean to "call" you that, but rather to suggest you were coming across as one at times...you know the difference, right?

See, that's the thing with forums - you don't get to see me pissing myself as some of the dumbarse things others have posted, and you don't necessarily get to see that I'm taking the piss out of them being dumbarses. That might well come across as dickish, but do I much care? Nope. These things are here to amuse us all. :(

3) Most importantly, those faces (the bane of my life): the reason I hate them so is because I CAN'T do them. I'm fairly certain my work computer limits the things you can do on here (when I post it often kicks me out and makes me log back on etc). Either that or I am very stupid (I HAVE been listening to Outlaw Pete on repeat for the last 16 hours straight!!!, see, that would have been a perfect time to insert the faces but I have do make do with lcrappy exclamation marks).

Hang on, if I copy/paste yours it might....:P...woohooo!

:lol::D

PS - the people from the nuthouse are on their way, tho it sounds as tho they're too late and your insanity will be permanent. 16 hours? You're some sick bunny. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
no-one has been as abusive as you've been.

Yes, you started off pleasantly enough, then it's if you snapped, and started the name calling

to be honest, just going back over your earlier posts, they're just silly really...

1st post (I think... .don't want to be open to the lying acusation again...)):

How can he be over-rated.. millions of people like him, they're the ones who rate him highly (obviously) you just don't like him

2nd post (possibly..?):

He's not highly rated..?? someone better tell the promoters

and you think he's crap, that's all, loads don't

not much later:

he failed to impress you, and (presumably) many others. He did impress plenty of people

now I realise they're not particularly offensive.. but not much later you started calling me a moron for making a jokey comment on how an argument with you usually ends up being quite abusive...

that's when the debate turned, as far as I can tell

See, you still don't get it. :D

Is your opinion of Bruce "silly"? Then why is mine? My opinion has an identical basis to your own. If my opinion of Bruce is "silly" then so is yours.

Do you think your opinion of Bruce "silly"? If you don't, you're a fully paid up member of the Bruce morons club, and me calling you a moron was 100% spot on. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
But you're still yet to find any post in which somebody claims that your opinion is worth less than theirs.

there's loads of them. :lol:

The latest example is tonyblair's latest post on this very page, cos I'm damned sure he doesn't think his own opinion of Bruce silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
obviously having a problem with basic english here...

where have I said your opinion is silly. You said he's over-rated crap.. that's not an opinion.

yes it is - it's my opinion. :lol:

You also said it's not true that he's highly rated... that's not an opinion either (and it's wrong )

I accept that was badly worded and could have been put in a clearer way.

What I meant was that he doesn't deserve that rating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Erm im sure you just dont understand english very well.

Tony Blair is pointing out the flaws in your argument, as you are making very definite statements when actually they are opinions. Tony Blair pointing out that regardless of your opinion, Bruce is highly rated, isnt an opinion of Tony Blairs, its a fact.

they are statements of my opinion. :lol:

If someone says "Bruce is great" then that's their opinion. It, funnily enough, works in reverse too.

(It was the "silly" bit I pulled him up on - he has a point with the "highly rated" bit, due to poor wording from me on what I meant).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
I thought you said earlier that someone had explicitly said that your opinion was worth less than theirs.

perhaps less thought and more reading of what's being said? Just a thought.

So tonyblair isn't allowed to interpret your posts in a certain way but you are allowed to interpret his in a certain way?

There's a distinct whiff of double standards and hypocrisy around here.

tony has made false statements - there is no interpretation gone on by him because where he chose to falsely portray what I'd said my words were clear enough that they could not have been misinterpreted to mean what he posted.

We're all expressing opinions here. There is no need for every post to be peppered with "IMO" and the like to make it 100% clear that it's that person's opinion. So when he says my opinion of Bruce is silly, unless he also thinks his own opinion - and everyone else's - of Bruce to be silly then he's believing his own opinion to be worth more by his dismissal of mine as "silly".

Please do note that nowhere have I said anything similar of the Bruce-likers opinions of Bruce. I consider them as welcome to their own opinions of Bruce as I am to my own opinion. So there's not the double standards you're imagining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Based on what exactly Neil? The 5 minutes youve seen of him at Glasto and his latest record that you hate?

You (presumably) have your opinion that he deserves that rating, based on your experiences of him. I have my opinion that he doesn't deserve that rating based on my experiences of him.

Care to show me how one of those opinions can be worth more than the other? :lol:

They are both informed opinions, of equal weight. You don't have to agree with my opinion, but if you want me to respect your opinion (and I do - I've not disrespected ANYONE'S opinion of Bruce on these boards) then please give me the courtesy of respecting mine. :P

Youre beginning to disappear into that longdrop youve dug btw.

:D

and the contents of those longdrops is coming out in your posts BTW.

:P

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You (presumably) have your opinion that he deserves that rating, based on your experiences of him. I have my opinion that he doesn't deserve that rating based on my experiences of him.

Care to show me how one of those opinions can be worth more than the other? :D

and the contents of those longdrops is coming out in your posts BTW.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
Well when I read this:

And then it transpired that not a single person had told you that your "opinion is worth less than their own", then we would have to assume that you've been telling one of those lies that your so fond of shouting at tony about. Naughty Neil.

Unless you can find someone who has told you that?

I think your statement that I've quoted above is pretty clear and can't really be interpreted in any way other than (again, I quote):

I'm sure that those people that you've accused will be prepared to turn the other cheek and accept your apology to them though. I would put one of those silly faces at this point, but I find them contemptible.

oh do please take your head from your arse. No wonder all you're smelling is shit. :D

I didn't say your opinon is (or was) silly, I said your posts were.

and within my post that you find to be silly is what? My opinion.

FFS. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...