Should Stafford get the T.V coverage ?

[Rhyscot]

I think its about time Stafford get the t.v coverage, by sure we deserve atleast one year of it anyway

[Gaaz]

Defoo (: Staffordshire deserve it this yeaar

[Squall Moogle]

Probably, Staffs certainly has more people and is the better of the two. It also usually has the better of the two days lineup on the Sunday (like last year and 06 for example) and in my opinion that is the best way to end the festival .

[rhysieg]

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (+ MORE EXCLAMATIONS)

for obvious reasons. we dont want the z-list celeb fest like chelms.

[xxtinkerbellxx]

100% no. i go to enjoy myself not get self centred ditz try and get themselves on camera. been to festivals like that and there pants. "in 3 guys scream for the camera 3....2...1..." nooo thankyou!

[Rhyscot]

Veryy Very Good point

[PaulDavis]

Definately, this will show what the northerners bring to the festival

Like Duffy and Amy MacDonald said last year, Stafford's crowd is better

[Tommy Tippy]

Definately, this will show what the northerners bring to the festival

Like Duffy and Amy MacDonald said last year, Stafford's crowd is better

[bertieb73]

No thanks. I prefer to watch my bands without a big cameraman getting in the way. Plus some bands play to the camera's rather than the crowd when they know it's going to be on TV. I've paid my money so expect the artists undivided attention!!

[Rhyscot]

Like Duffy and Amy MacDonald said last year, Stafford's crowd is better

[Rhyscot]

although all the bad points of having the coverage i still think we should have it just one year

[Haarv]

Yeah it would make a change but I doubt it will ever happen.

[bekimo]

Absolutely, 100% NO! Crowd would be pushed back from the stage to get the cameras in at the front, meaning even if ur at the front, ur no where near the stage!! And thus if ur a "little way" back from the stage it feels like ur miles away. Aaaaand, you get all the wannabes, reality tv "stars" and crap that comes with tv cameras!!! I like it without the cameras. Why would you want the cameras there anyway? For your 15 seconds of fame? See if your mom can see you on telly?

Meh!

B x

[Rhyscot]

Yehh, Chelmsford always have the luxuries.. haha,

[Tunster]

And like Mathew Bellamy said .. Staffords better

Edited March 8, 2009 by Tunster

[Talihina Sky]

I agree. The coverage should stay with Chelmsford.......but if they were to have cameras at Stafford they should merge it with the Chelmsford footage maybe. I would personally keep the tv coverage at Chelmsford

[MOLLYJESS]

Have been to Chelmsford for two years now and have never seen any cameras around - othe than the huge ones that hover above the crowds over main stage and channel 4 stage - (I had my two seconds of fame watching Verve last year!!!!) - i've never seen cameras around amongst people though - think they are mainly in VIP and those other "lounge" areas!!!! It's always nice watching it back home on TV though and thinking - "I was there"!!!!!

[The Cat Burglar]

They wanted to do it in Staffs one year but all the camera's got nicked.

[redmad1971]

Who cares really? If your at the festival you can't watch the tellybox anyway.

[hoolyberry]

But like someone said earlier - it is nice to watch it on tv when you get home and think, i was there! something to hold on to for prosperity too. Stafford should get the coverage. Dont you think that Chelmsford has too many trees blocking everybodys view......feel sorry for the unfortunate ones behind the tree not being able to see fack all!

[shayy]

And like Mathew Bellamy said .. Staffords better

[shayy]

At the end of the day there is the points of z-listers.

But then again staffords always going to be the better crowd.

Generally cause chelmsfords full of posers and just generally crap.

When you watch playbacks like the next day its never the same.

Its like :| stafford was completely different.