Photography

[kerplunk]

I see the Stone Roses are greedily cashing in at every opportunity. w*nkers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk...t-arts-18623293

If the Roses want unrestricted rights to use other people's copyright work, then they should also be allowing the copyright holders the same unrestricted rights to use their copyrighted work.

If the Roses want to restrict how other people's copyrighted work can be used, then there should be a similar restriction on their own exploitation of that copyrighted work.

As I always say when I'm presented with a form like this to sign - which I will never sign - "if you want the rights to exploit my copyrighted photos, then I want the rights to exploit your copyrighted music".

I fucking hate copyright, but it's the way of the world and if it's going to exist its existence should be fair to all concerned.

I had to agree the exact same terms ('cept they weren't offering a pound!) for Glade last week.

[eFestivals]

I had to agree the exact same terms ('cept they weren't offering a pound!) for Glade last week.

I would have told them to sod off, and I'm happy for you to do so with your work for efests.

Edited June 29, 2012 by eFestivals

[kerplunk]

I would have told them to sod off, and I'm happy for you to do so with your work for efests.

Nice to know - I've got a lot of goodwill for glade so not majorly put out.