Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Do you smoke?


Guest Jackmypie

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 341
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They aren't methodological frameworks for the person, they're methodological frameworks for the relationship between therapist and client.

If they say that they are over smoking yet they smoke, then they are in denial. If they give you credit for them quitting, then they're transferring. If they keep smoking because they say they can't cope, then they're regressing.

You can't deny the relationship and what the person is saying to both you and themselves. They may be rational, but they'll lie to themselves to get around themselves - especially if they're addicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's often the case though. Denial is immense as are all of the other defense mechanisms. We identify with them because we perceive them as part of our personality as distinct from reality. In fact, there's no avoiding them as we are not privy to an objective world. We'd be like the Visitors from V without them (sci-fi reference for you).

I actually admire Skinner more than the other behaviourists. The age of behaviourism in the human sciences is over though, as CBT testifies. It's used in the computer sciences more han anything else now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is labelling and categorising getting out of control as far as I can see. Even if a type of personality () is a pre-requisite, the variations will be as good as infinite... so where does it get you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, to believe that is to realise something intellectually. You don't realise it physiologically do you. We aren't the body, but the experience of the body. The body tends not to deny itself, unlike ourselves.

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as you know I believe the brain produces this experience of ourselves. I think somehow our brain draws all our sensory data together and combines it so it makes sense. And the way it does that is by separating the 'I' from the experience. So there isn't just red, there's a me who sees the red.

Which might be necessary on an evolutionary level - if you couldn't distance yourself from the experience, you'd have no mechanism for removing yourself from danger - you'd just be, no matter whether being was pain. Or destruction.

Edited by worm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'I' being a series of defense mechanisms at any given time often completely oblivious to the everyday danger posed by mortality. What about people who self-sacrifice? Are we going down the Dawkins route of doing it for the benefit of genetic survival?

It's all about narrative to me. We fit our idealisations and experiences into a pre-existing cultural narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh what we do with the 'I' once we've got it is a whole different ball game. I was speculating that it could be physical in nature. not what we do with it.

Edited by worm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is such thing as physical addiction. A physical addiction will create an entire set of physical symptoms in withdrawal. For alcohol and benzodiazipines (this includes valium), this physical withdrawal can be severe enough to causing fits and death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is such thing as physical addiction. A physical addiction will create an entire set of physical symptoms in withdrawal. For alcohol and benzodiazipines (this includes valium), this physical withdrawal can be severe enough to causing fits and death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Maybe hopeful but get Knocked Loose on the Sunday opposite the legend. Similar to the slot Turnstile had in 2022. Would be absolutely phenomenal.
    • One of my personal favourite bands at the minute - MUNA. Was very surprised not to see them booked in 2023 with their last album but hopefully they'll be around next year. Very fun new album from these guys and, as aforementioned, another standout for me at Big Weekend.
    • Absolutely second this. Were great at Big Weekend and already have a great catalogue of songs forming so far. Would love to see them on the farm!
    • A mixed first day for us. First of all, we were honestly quite shocked that there was no security check at all at the VIP entrance around 7:30 PM. No bag check, nothing. I’ve attended Primavera many times over the years and this felt surprisingly lax for an event of this size. Did anyone else experience the same?   Another disappointment was the communication regarding the weather situation. Primavera has some of the best sound systems and speaker setups in the festival world, yet somehow they were not able to make a single clear announcement explaining what was happening. Instead, people were expected to read tiny messages on screens in Mordor while thousands were left wondering what was going on. A simple and direct audio announcement would have gone a long way.   On a lighter note, this guy absolutely made my day. Sitting right in front of the Estrella Damm terrace, wearing nothing but a long-sleeve shirt, jeans and a pair of Converse All Stars, he remained completely unbothered by the rain. While everyone else was looking for shelter, he sat there wearing sunglasses, calmly watching the crowd as if he was watching a movie.   Absolute main character energy!
    • I think my party got pretty lucky last night, at least compared to some of the horror stories over on Reddit. I was very impressed with Father John Misty in particular.   Perhaps my view would be different if I were a big Massive Attack fan or whatever, but right now my feeling is that if it's not safe for the shows to go ahead... then it's not safe for the shows to go ahead. I'd much rather they were cautious than roll the dice when it comes to something like that.    Here's hoping everyone has a better day today. 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...