Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The Beatles


Cardboard Box City

Recommended Posts

Too simplistic, too simple for me. Sorry. Compare and contrast with something of the intracacies of Tom Thumb Blues by Bob Dylan, or around that time, and you'll see what I mean.

And a couple of points on the Beatles output as compared to Bob's. There are four Beatles, and only one Bob. And the amount of stuff Bob didn't release in that period which could have gone out is legendary. Stuff like Wallflower, Santa-Fe, Mama you've been on my mind, Sitting on a Barbed Wire Fence, She's Your Lover Now .. all could have strolled onto studio albums.

Anyone would think you're a fan of Bob......

I like him too, but I'm not comparing everything The Beatles did to stuff Dylan did. Two different artists, two important artists. Two very good artists.

Yesterday is beautifully simple and - in my opinion and looking at it as a standalone piece of music - it's fantastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in a thread of opinions, may I also state the fact that there isn't anything else in the world, more people agree on, than that the Beatles made good music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

song-structure wise, Dylan barely changed from when he started

I'm leaving it now, tonyblair, I'm not going to spoil the Beatles thread with Bob's presence.

Take it the Bob thread if you want it sunshine.

Edited by sifimaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

compared to the chasm that there is between songs like Please Please Me and Strawberry Fields, or Love Me Do and I Want You, they're fairly similar. The structure, the 'type' of chords that are used. The Beatles re-wrote the rule book on what you can and can't do in a song.

* plays "Like a Rolling Stone" card, and flounces off out of thread *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

* plays "Like a Rolling Stone" card, and flounces off out of thread *

Wonderful song.

Hardly folk though is it?

Dare I say, he'd not have written that without knowing Lennon, and of course most of Lennons decent songs from '65 onwards would not have been written without Dylan.

Can we not like both?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

musically, that's a very simple song...

I'm not a musician. I know something about words though. And I know it's words are really very good.

And without it, the Beatles might still have been recording "love me do" over and over?

But Peevis makes a point. And if any Beatle fan out there is any doubt, go and listen to Fourth Time Around by Bob Dylan, so he can make his ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a musician. I know something about words though. And I know it's words are really very good.

And without it, the Beatles might still have been recording "love me do" over and over?

But Peevis makes a point. And if any Beatle fan out there is any doubt, go and listen to Fourth Time Around by Bob Dylan, so he can make his ...

Dylan had a huge impact on the Beatles but that was prior to 'Like a rolling stone'. You need to be looking at 64/65.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dylan had a huge impact on the Beatles but that was prior to 'Like a rolling stone'. You need to be looking at 64/65.

Stone was released in 65.

Hence why I think he was miles ahead. Not to say the Beatles didn't catch up mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a musician. I know something about words though. And I know it's words are really very good.

And without it, the Beatles might still have been recording "love me do" over and over?

But Peevis makes a point. And if any Beatle fan out there is any doubt, go and listen to Fourth Time Around by Bob Dylan, so he can make his ...

It's also worth noting that Macca was influenced by the jazz music his old man played too. I guess we'll never know for sure, but nothing happens in a vaccum except a hoover and space, so without Dylan they would have been inspired by other things.

Anyways the main inspiration for both and all was the times, the social revolution and the determination to change the old world. Some could say Christine Keeler, Lee Harvey Oswald, the pill, the coming of age of a generation, the increased affluence for the young inspired them both.

But of course the main reason The Beatles WOULD have progressed was the competition between Lennon and Macca. Macca inspired Lennon more than Dylan ever did I'm afraid. it was John's band and i doubt he'd have ever settled for letting Paul write all the tunes.

Edited by Peevis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

indeed.. one of the problems with most critiques of any artist is that it's done in isolation. There was so much going on at the time, both musically and socially. In many ways, Dylan does tower above a lot of it, but even he would have been influenced by some of what was happening.

1965 was a monumental year musically ('66) was pretty good too.

As Reg Presley rather famously said they all "put some f**king fairy dust on the bastard" :D

All Tap fans should listen to the Troggs tapes. Youtube it, it's hilarious!!

Edited by Peevis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most definately

Theres always been a lot of respect between Brian Wilson and Macca

God only knows is Macca's favourite song.

he's not all wrong on that neither. Although I sometimes find it hard to decide between that and Don't worry baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Listened to Abbey Road on my ipod on the way in to work.

It's always been one of my favourites, but it might possibly - and only temporarily - be given the honour of sitting at the top of my favourite albums list.

Stunning piece of work.

Thinking about it - in 1968 and 1969, they recorded 3 albums, one of which was a double album. And then Abbey Road has these short songs beautifully crafted together. That is a LOT of songs in only 18 months or so. Quite phenomenal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a few more that are a bit rubbish in my opinion :

The Word, Good Night, Why Don't we do in the Road and - this is contraversial I'm sure - Taxman.

The Word - I quite agree.

Good Night - disagree. Not a classic but has it's charm. And my mum used to play it to me when I was little to get me to shut the f**k up. Apparently I preferred Helter Skelter.

Why Don't We Do It In The Road - yeah, not great is it? What I would consider to be one of the White Album 'filler' tracks IMHO so never a classic.

Taxman - get out of here. Great track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Side Two is excellent. Side one let's it down a bit.

Right - another rubbish post-Rubber Soul rubbish Beatles song : You Know My Name (Look Up the Number)

That's a bit crap, but I find it funny.

Have you got Anthology 3? There is some right shite on that record that thankfully never made it to an album. I think one is called What's The New Mary Jane? It's complete bollocks. Another bad one that never made it was Teddy Boy. Again, dreadful.

Though they didn't add All Things Must Pass onto an album. One of George's best ever songs IMHO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know what I think when I hear Taxman?

Na, Na, Na, Na, Na, Na, Na, Na...Batman

:D :D

Surely that's reason to like it more?

What do you have against Batman? Batist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • All you can say is...     If he couldn't convince nations that really would've benefitted from the short-term hit of an up-front £50mil payment by this time next year, what hope did he have?   Guess we'll now just have to monitor and see if this could derail Infantino's plans to be re-elected FIFA President next year.
    • Spider-Man: Brand New Day   Highlight was a bloke reacting to the post-credit scene by going "Holy f**k it's Tobey Maguire!" despite the scene having no reference to him at all. Which made my close-to-full screening of the film laugh a lot.   Film was pretty good. It was interesting as much as an exploration of the ramifications of the end of No Way Home and being about isolationism and male loneliness, which I thought it actually did quite well. Though I do ponder if I liked it as much as the other 3 Tom Holland Spider-Man movies. Sadie Sink was good tbf, while I also liked Jon Bernthal as Punisher, enough that I might go watch his Disney+ shows.   Seem to have had a Marvel kick recently having also watched Thunderbolts and Shang-Chi, both of which I thought were pretty good.
    • Wolf Alice won't get headliner for Reading either, they will sub if they play, that is where their level has stopped I feel. Both TFG and Skyvip for the big shows this year was just a stretch too far. Every headliner this year is bigger than them too I'd say.   Agree with Capaldi I don't think Yungblud will be at Reading. I would guess Bludfest 3 or Download.
    • If Dolly Parton could do it, I highly doubt it. Just not right for it.   This
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...