singles thread

[Radar]

Ah, the voice of patriarchy speaks. *Keep our women pure so that only the noble may defile them*.

** Assumption.

[sifi]

This seperates me from MOST males.

[worm]

So why shoot low and get sexual gratification from someone you are not attracted

Edited September 9, 2008 by worm

[Katster]

So the munters seek him out.

[worm]

But... what the f**k do you base THAT assumption on?!

Since when did "giving a shit" have anything to do with patriarchy or "nobility" ???

Or for that matter, "purity"

Edited September 9, 2008 by worm

[Katster]

I have to say that every single woman I've ever slept with was attractive to me.

[worm]

Aye, which is what I said from the start.

[Goblinz]

How is it 'shooting low'? Women aren't categories. This just sounds like sexism.

[worm]

No it isn't, stop trying to get me in to trouble.

Edited September 9, 2008 by worm

[Radar]

Because you didn't like 'people like me' destroying romanticism.

[Millsy2008]

this thread is getting very tetchy these days

[Katster]

No, you said women had a different psychology to men. You don't have.

[Katster]

this thread is getting very tetchy these days

[worm]

I just don't understand - and have a personal difficulty with - anyone being able to see what *is* a physically intimate, emotionally complex, and indeed psychologically complex act - as "just a simple act."

[Goblinz]

Wasn't intended fella. But it sounded like it to me.

The human dollar doesn't wash either.

100 years ago, it woudn't have been deemed human to want to go home with someone you deemed attractive outside of marriage. Just as it seemingly isn't deemed human to go home with someone you don't necessarily deem attractive now.

[Radar]

or Russell Brand

[sadwitch]

Seeing as different people find different people attractive it's a bit hard to judge if someone's "going home with a munter". They might not regard them as muntery.

[Goblinz]

I'm confused now. In general men don't think differently to women regarding sex? I reckon they do.

Someone who doesn't repulse me when I think about writhing about under sheets with him

In this sense at least.

In terms of marriage I won't settle for anything less than Jack Sparrow or Russell Brand

[Katster]

It's irrelevent anyway, 100 years ago it would have being deemed a bad thing to want to take someone home out of wedlock, it doesn't mean people didn't swant to though, they maybe just didn't follow through with their lust due to social implications.

[worm]

Someone who doesn't repulse me when I think about writhing about under sheets with him

In this sense at least.

Edited September 9, 2008 by worm

[Katster]

You can do better than Russell Brand darlin' !!!

[Radar]

But it would be akin to sickness to believe that all sexual experience leads to these emotional and intimate complexities.

[Goblinz]

Seeing as different people find different people attractive it's a bit hard to judge if someone's "going home with a munter". They might not regard them as muntery.

[worm]

well maybe deemed human is the wrong phrase, swap it for "deemed human in todays society in the UK" if it makes it sound better to you.

It's irrelevent anyway, 100 years ago it would have being deemed a bad thing to want to take someone home out of wedlock, it doesn't mean people didn't swant to though, they maybe just didn't follow through with their lust due to social implications.

Edited September 9, 2008 by worm

[Katster]

Well, in that case, only a masochist would have sex with someone who is unattractive. Know many male masochists?

I suggest to you that the males you know very much wouldn't be repulsed by these women. If they say they are then they're either lying, masochistic or were pissed.