Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Line Up Resembling a Reunion Festival?


Guest NeilVJ

Recommended Posts

I really don't know why this topic arises time and time again.

When is the line up going to be confirmed?

Have 'such and such' confirmed yet?

Blah blah effing blah ....

In my (rather humble) opinion, if it really bothers you that much spend your well earned cash on a ticket to V ....

I know its becoming a cliche (sorry, don't know how you do the accent thingy's!?!), but Glastonbury is so much more. If it wasn't the line up would be released before ticket day and all those U2 groupies would rush to buy a ticket and then leave that night leaving a very sad & empty Worthy Farm ....

Peace and love x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I really don't know why this topic arises time and time again.

When is the line up going to be confirmed?

Have 'such and such' confirmed yet?

Blah blah effing blah ....

In my (rather humble) opinion, if it really bothers you that much spend your well earned cash on a ticket to V ....

I know its becoming a cliche (sorry, don't know how you do the accent thingy's!?!), but Glastonbury is so much more. If it wasn't the line up would be released before ticket day and all those U2 groupies would rush to buy a ticket and then leave that night leaving a very sad & empty Worthy Farm ....

Peace and love x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd hardly class U2 as reunion gig? I don't think they've ever split up, and they are touring a new album.

I think it's an incredibly daft thread. I've never understood the fascination with the new. If we've had sixty years or so of popular music releases, the chances are that the best ones won't have been in the last twelve months or so. Simple probabilities dictate it's highly unlikely that the best ones won't have been released in the last twelve months or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, as a code that produces a little picture. Not the same.

But anyone who uses 'lol' etc on Spazzbook or in a post is just being lazy or doesn't mind looking exceptionally stupid. Putting 'lol' at the end of a sentence translates to 'I have nothing whatsoever to say, and you might as well ignore everything I wrote before I decided to type this immature bollocks that make me look 14'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

how is it not? i used to think the same, but lol and :P are the exact same thing. it doesn't lessen anything you've said, it strengthens it. it indicates what the person writing is thinking. much like :lol:, :lol: or :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But it's a code for a picture. So it's not the same thing at all. It doesn't appear on the page the same, does it? It has a different function.

:P (or any other emoticon) = smiley used for the purpose of showing I'm amused by something, or to denote use of sarcasm/irony as not to appear too scathing of others.

lol = immature bollocks written by lazy, childish people who can't and won't spell.

Your reluctance to use capital letters is very mildly irritating, but at least you make the effort to spell so I let you off. :P (Appropriate emoticon added to demonstrate my point - that's me trying to show you I'm having banter with you and you shouldn't interpret that sentence as scathing criticism).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and simply writing lol is used to indicate that one is amused by something. i'm surprised that you think the one with the pretty picture is the less mature of the two :P lol (see what i did there)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be bothered reading the rest of the thread, by the looks of the few posts above, it's turned into petty squabbling (as a lot of threads seem to be doing just now.)

But in my opinion, the lineup doesn't resemble a "reunion" festival, because so many legends are playing, it represents a legendary festival. Quite a fitting image, for Glastonbury IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - that was very sharp, quick and almost bordering on witty.

I don't use the pretty pictures to display any signs of 'maturity'. They're message board emoticons. Codes. But they're displayed as pictures. But they still look better than some w**ky meaningless jumble of letters that are written by people trying to appear 'cool'.

To me, 'lol' is nothing but lazy, stupid, ignorant and childish. It doesn't mean anything. It's simply written down because some thick twat couldn't be bothered to write 'ha ha' or something after they were amused, because typing is SUCH a hassle. And they shouldn't be writing 'ha ha' either, to be bluntly honest.

People who can't be arsed to type using proper words shouldn't be allowed to own hands and fingers. Emoticons aren't words.

Shall we get back to Glasto chat now? This is getting very 'Dicussions'-esque, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be bothered reading the rest of the thread, by the looks of the few posts above, it's turned into petty squabbling (as a lot of threads seem to be doing just now.)

But in my opinion, the lineup doesn't resemble a "reunion" festival, because so many legends are playing, it represents a legendary festival. Quite a fitting image, for Glastonbury IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i joined two days ago actually! just took me a day to decide whether to add a prick like you or not :P
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've noticed :P

I think you're both just bored and on edge about the impending announcement to be honest :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not that this has anything to do with the topic, but the word 'gay' has just really shifted semantically, like it did in the past when going from being 'happy' to 'homosexual.' I don't think the majority of people who use that word in a negative context are referring to the homosexual meaning these days. Those who do are idiots.

English lesson over :P

Edited by Kowalski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...