Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

photographers & glasto


Guest Deepsky

Recommended Posts

Im just planning on buying a cheap second hand digital camera off ebay with a large GB SD card! so it wont be a huge loss if it was to be stolen or misplaced! Just would be gutted about losing the photos!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
I took a 24-70 for crowd and panos etc. and a 70-200 to try to get closer to the stages. As these are both f/2.8 full format lenses they are bleeding heavy. I would have liked to go wider at times and also have had a longer reach - but they did a great job. I made use of both of them equally - so can't really leave either at home next time. I could do with one or two fixed lenses - like a 20mm & 50mm for times when my back needs a rest and then leave the zooms in the lockups for a bit.

I've also got a Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 but did leave that one at home!

I'm going through the photos to upload onto flickr. if I remember I'll bump this thread with a link when I'm done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally uploaded some of my Glastonbury 2009 photos:

See some here (4 posts of 5 photos each): /index.php?s=&showtopic=136701&view=findpost&p=3106369">http://www.efestivals.co.uk/forums/index.p...t&p=3106369

Or for my Flickr set (60 photos) here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/j_hunt/sets/72157623390546480/

cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I can say is you need to be very careful where cameras are concerned. Over the years I've seen some very, very foolish people around the site. When will they ever learn it's not big, it's not clever and they'll only regret it!

Never...

Never...

NEVER...

buy a Nikon!

As for me - once again I'll be taking my superb Canon 40D :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent question. I tried a lot of different settings and still had to tweak in post processing.

For the crowd shot at Arcadia I went with: Aperture priority: I chose matrix metering and f/3.5, the camera matched it with 1/40th shutter speed and I let it choose the ISO which was 1000 in this case. I had also set the camera to over expose by .7 of a stop. That was was pretty much spot on.

For the portrait formatted shot of the Pyramid stage with Blur performing and the moon in shot I went with: Aperture priority again: I chose f/5.6, camera chose 1/40th again and also decided on ISO 1600. I tweaked it down a third of a stop in post processing, but not sure it needed that.

I tend to set the camera to use a minimum of 1/40th of a second shutter speed before it starts zooming up the ISO as with the 24-70mm lens, or using the short end of the 70-200mm lens, that is about as slow as I can go without too much getting camera shake.

And no, those settings weren't from memory! I just checked the EXIF data.

The more challenging ones were the indoor no flash shots (flash not allowed in the Acoustic tent) of Hugh Cornwell for example. I went with matrix metering, but under exposed by 2 stops. Again, low shutter speed (1/40th), large aperture (f/3.2) but managed to use low ISO (250) as I was underexposing. At normal metered exposure his face would have been seriously overexposed.

I still needed to tweak the highlights or shadows a bit in post processing to bring back some detail - I use Nikon's Capture NX2 for that.

For most gig shots in our local club that has a horrendous lighting setup (most of it is pitch black with bright spots on one or two of the band members faces) I normally go with manual exposure settings and experiment by bracketing etc. but always have to use a little flash or ISO ranging from 1600 up to 6400.

Hope this helps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • He was also arrested for allegedly punching his pregnant girlfriend.   Such a charmer.
    • George Borg - now he was a character. Both terrifying and endearing, often in the space of 5 minutes. Entertaining times back then!
    • Shamelessly got AI to put my lineup prediction into a poster. This is based on Wacken and what I think we may get generally. Could just as easily replace Knocked Loose with Malev because it’ll be one of the other. Wish we could have a scenario where they co-headline and each get like 75mins or something. 
    • There’s normally a high churn but to only have one bit-part player left from the season before is very strange - unless you go into administration. Our new manager made his signings early - mainly from the league below - so interesting to see what happens.
    • As has been said Trump wasn't lying when he said he has solved multiple wars.   I mean he's ended the Iranian war at least 9 times so far and counting...
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...