Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Young,Dumb and Living off Mum BBC3


Guest gratedenini

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 512
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I said I started with no rules, and then worked out which ones worked (like consistency). They weren't rules that only apply to bringing up kids though, simple, general rules that apply to life in general usually.

where have I said or indicated I control them? (he asks, knowing it will probably be ignored)

it's not an accident, it's behaviour where they haven't experienced the consequences. You can suggest to your kid a million times that touching something like a hot iron will be a painful experience. It's almost an inevitabiltiy that they won't realise it until they've done it. Obviously something more important like running out into the road needs to be understood before they've experienced the consequences by being hit by a car.

you see how different situations need different responses?

this is why I generally steer clear of 'rules'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So no rules was bullshit spin....

So lets talk about control.... Which of course you don't do...

If you saw your kid about to run into the road would you stop them ?

If your kid didn't want to do there home work would that be ok ?

Depends on the severity of the crime and age of the child...

Removal of pocket money, restriction of freedom, restriction of toys, time on the naughty step... All that sort of stuff... No doubt you think its barbaric :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what I have found out is you do have rules... and you do control them... and basically you like to spin and call a rule and control something else :)

Would I punish my kid for running in the road... No... Would I punish my kid for playing chicken in the road... If I was made aware of it yes...

On is clearly an accident and the other a silly naughty child...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah that's what I was getting at earlier. What you call control I'd call support and guidance. Of course nobody is advocating allowing their kids out terrorising the neighbourhood. Of course there are boundaries. But I'd say I promoted caring values rather than making hard and fast rules.

It depends whether you call instilling social values and teaching personal safety is control I suppose.

Edited by oafc0000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I would (althogh never say never and all that) but right now I'd probably try my best to stay away from that. I don't mean to sound like a prick or that, but I personally wouldn't be able to handle that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll always remember walking out of the hospital for the first time with our first baby thinking "ok, it's real now, what the f**k do we do?"... :D

The thing I also remember was how I wanted, desperately wanted her to be brought up as freely as possible, with the main rule being 'no rules!'

I still look at my kids and think that I'm still partly wondering what it means to be a dad

honesty, communication, consistency, open up their minds as much as possible, don't say they can't do something unless you have a good reason, be there for them...

above all, LOVE THEM

similar to how I feel for anyone I care about really... these are my main 'foundations'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest that someone who uses the word 'control' as opposed to 'support and guidance' is after something slightly different. Many many parents DO think it's their role to control their kids, which is quite often the precise reason their kids get out of control. One of my best friends brought up his kids with precisely this kind of thinking. One of his sons is now out of control. He comes home on Friday night, usually with blood on him from some stupid fight he's started, and has very little to look forward to, he's almost a lost cause... it's very sad. He loved his boys, but he didn't really show it...

and we all have different ideas of what social values are

Edited by oafc0000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest that someone who uses the word 'control' as opposed to 'support and guidance' is after something slightly different. Many many parents DO think it's their role to control their kids, which is quite often the precise reason their kids get out of control. One of my best friends brought up his kids with precisely this kind of thinking. One of his sons is now out of control. He comes home on Friday night, usually with blood on him from some stupid fight he's started, and has very little to look forward to, he's almost a lost cause... it's very sad. He loved his boys, but he didn't really show it...

and we all have different ideas of what social values are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • sub yes I could see but I don't think they get 1hr 15, a headliner starting at 18:15 though is unlikely. Even the recent co-headlines that have had like 1hr 15 then a 1hr 30 after were on 8pm or just before, you are trailing behind more than 1.5 hours then. In that scenario some 3rd down bands are only starting at 18:15 and some haven't lol. I agree they won't not book them due to this but it won't be 6 headliners. It would be 5 headliners and you wouldn't want to see 5 headliners booked but Biffy were to not be thouhgt of as an option for one. Wolf Alice on the other hand could sub no bother and you'd think nothing of it. I'm not so sure Biffy would get headline though after the festival choice in Kendal this year.
    • Definitely. UKIP also used Merkel welcoming 1 million Afgans to Europe in 2015 during the brexit vote.   Politicians in other countries within the EU know the are going to lose voters to parties to the right of them over stuff like this and they've no control over it.
    • I think it will very much vary on who there is to book who they know will sell out a day.    They’ve co-headline and full headline stuff in future, there no reason at all they won’t do it again, even if it means cutting someone’s set by 15 mins or having a band less in a big bands day…   They’re not going to not book Foo fighters and instead get the equivalent of Florence and C&S just to not have a band do a big set…   …unless of course they think it will make them more money…
    • Maybe some right wing leaders like Meloni are just playing to their base, like Reform have been here talking about them ending up at Calais.
    • Citizenship via investment programs basically work by saying if you invest this much in our economy (say buy a property worth x) then we will either grant you citizenship or residency with a route to it. The EU has rules on how low countries can set the bar. Montenegro was one of the easier ones to get and they've had to tighten it up.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...