Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

World Cup 2010


Guest Cardboard Box City

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
that sums up every england team in the last ten years.

which is exactly my point.

It's just about the same team as it's been for the last ten years too, playing in the same (as a team) poor way. The manager is different, granted, but he's getting very little that's different out of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The only think that I believe is that we don't have a hope of winning. The players have the individual skills (well, just the first 11 - it's well flaky after that), but what they don't have is a team ethic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only think that I believe is that we don't have a hope of winning. The players have the individual skills (well, just the first 11 - it's well flaky after that), but what they don't have is a team ethic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol::lol:

North Korea's cunning plan to use their third goalkeeper spot for an extra striker has backfired badly.

Fifa have told them Kim Myong-Won, who usually plays as a centre-forward, will only be able to play as a goalkeeper in the World Cup.

Coach Kim-Jong Hun only named two regular goalkeepers in his squad, opting to choose Kim Myong-Won as a back-up keeper.

But in a statement, Fifa said: "The three players listed as goalkeepers can only play as goalkeepers during the Fifa World Cup and cannot play outfield. This will be communicated to the teams in the team arrival meetings and will be enforced on match days."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
if the other 12 are flaky (which includes milner), what the hell does that make precious theo? ;)

I was being a little more general than specifically meaning just the first 11.

But anyway, yep, I'd include Walcott in that flaky. The difference is, that when he's not, he has more than just about every other player when they're on their not-flaky days. What the others might pull out of the bag on a good day still isn't going to be enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
yeah, but theres still time for Don Fabio, one of the most decorated and respected managers in world football to bind them together.

Yeah, Scolari did the same at Chelsea, just like TGT said he would. :lol::lol:

this is the 1st time theyve been together for an extended period of time. time to build the relationships and bonds that can make a difference

The players have been there and done that many times, even if it's not been with Pat. Pat might 'bond' with the players, but once they get on the pitch the players revert to (non) form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players have been there and done that many times, even if it's not been with Pat. Pat might 'bond' with the players, but once they get on the pitch the players revert to (non) form.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, Scolari did the same at Chelsea, just like TGT said he would. :lol::lol:

The players have been there and done that many times, even if it's not been with Pat. Pat might 'bond' with the players, but once they get on the pitch the players revert to (non) form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
all possibilities i will grant you that

but that leaves open the possibility that this time, more than any other time, this time, don fabios going to find a way ,find a way to get away, this time, getting it all together, he'll get it right

'we still believe........'

well, I guess if you take the scattergun random approach that says things will get lucky one time in a million, then you'll probably be right on one of those million occasions. :P

Thing is, it still ain't gonna be this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rightio then folks - what do we think?

LW's predictions:

Winners: Spain

Runners up: Brazil

England: Semi Finalists

Dark Horses: Serbia, South Africa, Paraguay

Golden Boot Winner: David Villa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ampersadji's predictions:

Winners: Netherlands

Runners up: Spain

England: Last 16 (Germany)

Dark Horses: Serbia, Algeria, Ivory Coast

Golden Boot Winner: Robin van Persie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

since when were argentina a dark horse???

sure, they're not really expected to win it, but with the players they've got, they're in with the big guns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...