Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

age limit.


Guest Welshyyy

Recommended Posts

Lottery if you get searched or not in my experiance last year. I was in a group of 20, and only 5 of us got searched, me being one of them.

Anyway the guy who was looking through my bag clearly saw both my crates (me being 16 back then). but he took no notice of it. So I wouldn't lose much sleep over that.

And think about it, much easier for the security to let you through, stops arguements from occuring and makes the line move faster. And even once you get in, they're pretty easy going about the age factor. So don't worry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry but you cant possible prove anything as I have been working with the WBC for the past twenty years and I know that since the change in the act the bar staff have not been turning a blind eye and Reading is well known for teenager trying to get drinks who are underage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one thing saying it's going to become stricter.

The festivals want to make money, you make money at festivals by selling beer etc. Don't think bar staff are going to worry over the fact that someone may look a tiny bit younger than 18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well tbh i'll be like 3 days of 18th:| even though its still not legal, i look like a 20 year old now.. so i shouldn't really have a problem getting served

its just if i do i would want to take stuff in with me.. but dont wanna get id'd for it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one thing saying it's going to become stricter.

The festivals want to make money, you make money at festivals by selling beer etc. Don't think bar staff are going to worry over the fact that someone may look a tiny bit younger than 18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you Nuts ? Who in their right mind would risk a Criminal conviction just to make the bar more money ?

We are all Volunteers who mainly have full time jobs so a Criminal conviction could end up in a person being sacked from the their full time job.

In my Team I have Civil Servants - Local council workers - Pub landlords etc etc and no one is going to risk being caught out - Reading is crawling with Trading standards officers { the department that deals with under age drinking } who are watching who we serve to.

So are you claiming that you would risk it if it meant that you would lose your full time job ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you Nuts ? Who in their right mind would risk a Criminal conviction just to make the bar more money ?

We are all Volunteers who mainly have full time jobs so a Criminal conviction could end up in a person being sacked from the their full time job.

In my Team I have Civil Servants - Local council workers - Pub landlords etc etc and no one is going to risk being caught out - Reading is crawling with Trading standards officers { the department that deals with under age drinking } who are watching who we serve to.

So are you claiming that you would risk it if it meant that you would lose your full time job ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thousands of bars and nightclubs across the UK don't have trading standards checking who is being served every day/night.

A Pub may employ staff who get commission so they may turn a blind eye but at the bars at Reading no one is on commission so even if we sell bugger all the groups we represent will still get paid so there is absolutely no reason why any staff is going to take the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Glastoworker throwing a similar strop last year when this topic was being discussed.

To the original poster- though you might be unlucky and encounter a jobsworth steward, or a strict member of the bar staff (I know they're just following the law before you attack me Glastoworker,) but chances are you'll get in/get served with no problem- me and my friends were 18 last year and didn't look paticularly old, and weren't asked for ID throughout the weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...