Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Wellies, Walking Boots or Walking Shoes?


Guest PHyR

Recommended Posts

Help... I have been trying to decide for the last week what to buy?

I wore wellies for most of my first Glasto (2004) and by the end of the festival I could hardly stand from sore feet. After this I switched to walking boats, these were better but I blister-tastic after 2005 & 2007 so I dumped them.

Now I am tempted to some nice gore-tex walking shoes and some gators… but if the mud gets deep (2007 style) they will most certainly perish.

Should I stick with Wellies and go for some thick socks? Risk another pair of walking boats or just hope the mud doesn’t get too deep and goes with the goretex shoes?

Help, I need to make the plunge this lunchtime and I am no closer to making a decision.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its a bit late to buy brand new footwear now and not expect to have blisters. were some of your old trainers or whatever and leave some wellies in the car or your tent, not that you are going to need them as it going to be a dry one!!!!!!!

ps these walking BOATs sound interesting where can i purchase these from ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help... I have been trying to decide for the last week what to buy?

I wore wellies for most of my first Glasto (2004) and by the end of the festival I could hardly stand from sore feet. After this I switched to walking boats, these were better but I blister-tastic after 2005 & 2007 so I dumped them.

Now I am tempted to some nice gore-tex walking shoes and some gators… but if the mud gets deep (2007 style) they will most certainly perish.

Should I stick with Wellies and go for some thick socks? Risk another pair of walking boats or just hope the mud doesn’t get too deep and goes with the goretex shoes?

Help, I need to make the plunge this lunchtime and I am no closer to making a decision.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd recommend light-weight walking boots. The ankle support is key, walking shoes just won't provide enough support.

Make sure you wear a thick pair of walking socks over a thinner pair of padded socks, this should reduce the blisters.

If you're thinking of buying new shoes now, don't bother. They need to be broken in before being worn for several hours a day, otherwise they can cause a lot of rubbing and blisters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found that chelsea boots are great at festivals when the weather is inbetween. Just like comfortable ankle length wellies, slip on boots with no lace area that mud can get through. also you can get the cool winkle picker toe ones that glide through the mud better !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walking boots. Expect to pay a few quid though. I bought mine before Glasto in 2007. Cost me a hundred quid, and honestly the best festival purchase I've ever made. (apart from the yearly purchase of a 2.5l bottle of lenor, but that's a different kettle of fish). They keep your feet dry, and make you feel all nice and smug inside when you see someone getting their welly sucked off them by the clay monsters that live in the mud.

Similar to these:

merrell-cham-wrap-gore-xcr.jpg

*crosses fingers and hopes he's added the picture correctly*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say walking boots too. I bought a pair for 2007 for about £100. My feet were warm and dry throughout. I also wore 1000 mile socks and did not get a single blister.

Despite being caked in mud they cleaned up perfectly afterwards

*smug*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...