Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Crack down on gangs at Glasto


Guest musky

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm particularly liking the way witnesses can text any crime to security. Someone was saying on here the other day that too many people just go back to sleep after someone tries to get into their tent at night. This way we'll be able to report the thieves who go from tent to tent while claiming to be looking for someone without getting out of our sleeping bags.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we were at Womad last year somebody told us that there had been one particular gang that was responsible for the majority of festival theft. He said they had been caught after a police sting operation at a festival (after Glastonbury) and that they were anticipating very few problems at Womad.

Hopefully he was right and it will a relatively crime free Glastonbury.

Kev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it, because of this initiative, I reckon the official crime rate for Glasto will go up, as more crimes will get reported via text. In reality though, will the securities and police be able to do much more about it? Unless those reporting by text can be as detailed and as accurate as possible, just saying "There's been an attempted tent theft in Pennards'. It's a blue tent, next to a green one..." could take a while to investigate.

I still agree with it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it, because of this initiative, I reckon the official crime rate for Glasto will go up, as more crimes will get reported via text. In reality though, will the securities and police be able to do much more about it? Unless those reporting by text can be as detailed and as accurate as possible, just saying "There's been an attempted tent theft in Pennards'. It's a blue tent, next to a green one..." could take a while to investigate.

I still agree with it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about it, because of this initiative, I reckon the official crime rate for Glasto will go up, as more crimes will get reported via text. In reality though, will the securities and police be able to do much more about it? Unless those reporting by text can be as detailed and as accurate as possible, just saying "There's been an attempted tent theft in Pennards'. It's a blue tent, next to a green one..." could take a while to investigate.

I still agree with it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could do with publishing a stock message where you insert your own details, so they know where, when, what, who...

Like, North end of Williams Field, near the taps, 3 minutes ago, man in denim jacket - core details that they'd need, to be able to despatch security quickly from a centralised laptop that reads the texts live as they come in. Security have radios - I think it could prove really effective if they work it correctly.

Know what you're saying about the Mail...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last time (last year) I tried to report something to security, I was told there was nothing they could do about it unless I showed them the criminals actually in the act.

I hope that this, or any, initiative will be welcome progress to the way that crimes are handled on site..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good idea, what do these people steal though? all thats in my tent is beer, clothes and a bed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When we were at Womad last year somebody told us that there had been one particular gang that was responsible for the majority of festival theft. He said they had been caught after a police sting operation at a festival (after Glastonbury) and that they were anticipating very few problems at Womad.

Hopefully he was right and it will a relatively crime free Glastonbury.

Kev

I think they actually bagged the gang you're referring to AT womad last year (on the first day I think) and was the result of intelligence sharing between forces apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even a captive market.. it's the nature of the festival beast.

You could stay in "civilisation", and go to all the hassle of breaking into a house..

...or you could pay a little.. go to Glastonbury.. rob tents, which have little or nothing in the way of security, and usually contain small and/or expensive items... a lot easier to abscond with than a DVD player.

...and then you can make your escape into the biggest crowd in the country.

As far as drug dealing goes, you have a demographic at a big festival like Glasto, which more closely resembles that of your clientelle than any other area or gathering in the UK.

...and again.. if you shaft people, you can disappear easily.. and no-one's going to report it..

Oh, I could go on... but I won't, because I'm starting to make it sound like an enticing option for criminals.

It's probably worth mentioning that I do sleep with a 10 inche blade under my sleeping bag.

There's no security like your own Mr Pointy. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Latest Activity

    • Is anything said we need to be aware of?
    • Just listened to the new Madonna album, it would be a catastrophe if that isn't played on the pyramid!
    • Restore getting more than Lib Dems is not good.
    • https://x.com/amirtibon/status/2083054470871535853   Some thoughts on the Gaza agreement announced overnight, which despite my reservations and concerns, I hope will be implemented. 1. Donald Trump is trying to collect "wins" and "achievements" ahead of the midterm elections. His party is entering that election at a disadvantage, but because Democrats may choose weak and unpopular candidates in specific states, much like Republicans did in 2022, there's a reason for Trump to at least try achieving a surprising result like the one Biden secured four years ago.   2. The will to provide Trump such a "win" was an important motivation for all sides involved in this agreement: Hamas, Netanyahu, Qatar, Egypt, UAE and Turkey. All of them hope, each for their own reasons, that the transactional president will remember their role in the agreement and the positive media coverage it has generated and will continue to generate. You can like it or not, but that's the nature of diplomacy, especially in the Middle East, under Trump.   3. Netanyahu and his band of liars in the Israeli media (and the last few suckers in the American media still buying his spin) are already trying to oversell the agreement and present it in terms that contradict the Board of Peace statements and briefings. Of course, the October 7 Prime Minister can't just say the truth on this one, which goes something like: "I'm trying to stay on good terms with Trump ahead of an election here in Israel that will determine my personal fate and whether or not I go to jail in 2027."   4. For Hamas, the agreement is a way to buy time and survive, which is basically the organization's overarching goal since October 7. They lost most of their leadership and thousands of their fighters; they will also, I believe, give up some of their weapons to the new Gaza-based Palestinian government, which is a good thing. But at the bottom of all their decisions is a simple calculation: being able to say, "we committed the most deadly and humiliating attack against Israel since the start of the conflict, and survived as a movement and an organization to tell about it."   5. Hamas was able to say that yesterday, before the agreement was signed, and it can also say that today, after the conclusion of the negotiations. So in that regard, the agreement is preferable to the murky post-war reality that preceded it, in which Hamas was recruiting again thousands of young fighters, holding on to all its weapons, and controlling 99% of Gaza's population, making money off people buying fuel and cigarettes. Changing even a part of that terrible reality, by collecting some of the weapons and allowing progress on reconstruction under a non-Hamas government, is better. It means coming to terms with the fact that Israel under this government failed to dismantle Hamas and allowed its survival even before this agreement was signed.   6. Do I think the agreement will be fully implemented over the next 300 days, as I understand the timeline? I'm highly skeptical. But I'm also asking: what are the alternatives? Netanyahu, in his quest for political survival at all costs, ignored David Ben-Gurion's national security strategy of seeking short and decisive wars, which was based on Israel's unique internal and external challenges that make it dangerous for this country to have long wars of attrition. The result is an Israel that is hated, isolated and denounced around the world like never before, and is totally reliant on the support of one man (TRUMP) to avoid crushing international sanctions. Going to war in Gaza once again based on the same promise of "finishing Hamas," which this government failed to achieve after three long years, would have been suicidal unless Trump promised his full backing. And Trump, for good reasons, can't give such a commitment after his bitter experience with Netanyahu in Iran and Lebanon.   7. For me and my family, these are all very personal, not only political, questions. My six-year-old daughter will start school on the Gaza border in exactly one month, as we rebuild our life in the same home where Hamas tried to murder us on October 7. We've learned over the years to be highly skeptical of premature victory announcements and diplomatic celebrations. When these things collapse under the cynical realities of the conflict, most of those announcing them are not around to face the consequences. Still, I don't see a better alternative to the 20-Point Plan that Trump presented last year, at least not with Israel's current position of isolation and exhaustion under this government. So I have some hope that the agreement will succeed, even partially, and deliver a period of quiet. For us on the border, that would be significant after three years of war and trauma. And maybe in the long run, with different Israeli and Palestinian leadership, this will become a first step in a broader positive change for the region.
    • Until they're through the first round of votes there's no point believing any reports about who'll win.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...