Report
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Activity
-
By pink_triangle · Posted
I don’t really agree at all. From a political perspective she is socially more conservative than the likes of Mourdant and Cleverly and probably they are more economically conservative (although not by a huge deal) than Forbes. Let’s face it there are many SNP voters and political representatives with similar political views to those two Torys. In terms of competence I don’t see much evidence that Forbes is more confident. In fact I suspect Mourdant would scare UK labour more than Forbes would scare Scottish labour. I actually think Cleverly and Mourdant come across as pretty competent. It’s their politics which would stop me voting for them and not their competence. I would also be happy if either is conservative leader after the election. -
my new surgery uses an online form, used it first thing this morning, and had a call from the surgery within ten mins. worked really well, apart from them telling me they'd send the prescription to the chemist in the morning, at 12 the chemist didn't have it, i then had the runaround to chase it down and get it. not perfect, but hugely better than the doc's I've moved from. not sure i'd have got the prescription sorted from my old doc's. I've had to get 111 to sort it for them before now.
-
By steviewevie · Posted
the thing is...I would argue on paper they should all be considered competent, you look at their education and what they did before becoming politicians, and then how high they got in government, there must be something there. Braverman for example who comes across as a useless dumbarse populist is a clever woman and apparently well respected by people who work with her...but she does and says all this stuff that just makes you think what the f**k is that. Plus, being home secretary seems to be the worse job to get, everyone comes out of that one tarnished.. the department is too big, and to be fair she just used it for her own political gain and not what was actually good for the country, same with Patel. I actually think they should choose Cleverly, not sure he's the most dynamic/groovy choice, but he seems to not be a maniac, is pretty good at media, like s good rape joke etc. They'll probably pick Braverman though, who is definitely smart, but I have doubts if she'll be any good as leader, too abrasive. -
only good if they can get the doctors to do it? problem is (for job protection) that current doctors set limits on the numbers of new doctors that can be trained. so they'll always want too few to maintain their self importance.
-
These things obviously vary, but the bigger problem I see is that in planning out our day absolutely none of us ever account for the time spent getting beer, going to the toilets, food and some rest in the shade 😁
-
-
Latest Festival News
-
Featured Products
-
Monthly GOLD Membership - eFestivals Ad-Free
2.49 GBP/month
-
-
Hot Topics
-
Latest Tourdates