Jump to content

Don't Miss a Beat

Join the UK's most passionate festival community. Keep up with the latest conversations, line-up rumours, and music news.

250,000+ Members

Connect with a massive network of fellow festival-goers.

Lively Discussions

Thousands of active topics on music, campsites, and tips.

Hot Rumours & News

Hear about secret sets and lineup drops before anyone else.

Create Free Account
OR
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Squatter, sitter, other?


Guest geebus

Long drop or turdis; which do you do?  

89 members have voted

  1. 1. Squatter or sitter?

    • Female Squatter
      4
    • Female Sitter
      19
    • Male Squatter
      9
    • Male Sitter
      53
    • Female 'other'
      3
    • Male 'other'
      1


Recommended Posts

One friend, who was champion at who can piss highest up the wall, told us to stand outside and watch whilst he went for a wee. A few seconds later a yellow stream of piss was being squirted over the wall into the cubicle behind. You should have heard the shouting and swearing. We were all rolling about, luckily it was a small lady and not some big hairy arsed ogre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One friend, who was champion at who can piss highest up the wall, told us to stand outside and watch whilst he went for a wee. A few seconds later a yellow stream of piss was being squirted over the wall into the cubicle behind. You should have heard the shouting and swearing. We were all rolling about, luckily it was a small lady and not some big hairy arsed ogre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway; why I posted was that I had a theory that a lot of the 'mess' on seats was actually from women squatting/hovering over the seat.

With the presumption that most men just pissing would be at the urinals and are overall generally less 'picky' about such things so more likely to be sitters.

However, as things stand; seems it's pretty equal proportions between men and women.

Me? A quick wipe (always make sure I have a bit extra toilet roll than needed) and then a sitter - if I've sat in a cubicle, the next occupant will get a shiny ready-to-use seat :).

I've wondered before about some sort of 'deposit' scheme which worked with cameras that took a quick picture when the door was opened to leave - you lost your deposit on some sort of swipe-card if it was messier than when you entered. Could even let people 'earn' by tidying up other people's mess. Of course, a whole lot of money, time and hassle for the sake of making the festival slightly more pleasant, so can't see it being justifable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've wondered before about some sort of 'deposit' scheme which worked with cameras that took a quick picture when the door was opened to leave - you lost your deposit on some sort of swipe-card if it was messier than when you entered. Could even let people 'earn' by tidying up other people's mess. Of course, a whole lot of money, time and hassle for the sake of making the festival slightly more pleasant, so can't see it being justifable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was more that it's a generally absurd idea. :)

The cost of setting up and maintaining a sophisticated camera and swipe card system across that much countryside would be bonkers. You'd also have to develop some sort of software that can analyse pictures and judge what is acceptable and what isn't. I doubt anyone's made such software for festival toilets, so the development costs would be huge too. How would the cameras not get nicked or vandalised either?

I could go on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be for all toilets; just a selection. I was thinking of a self-reporting kinda system where if it wasn't acceptable, the next person could press a button to 'report'. Though, I don't think with modern pattern recognition software it would be too complex. Should be quite easy to send borderline ones to a human operator to make final adjudication, which could get through a lot in not much time.

Oh and yes, fully aware that it's a pretty ridiculous idea that won't happen in reality... at least not now; because I'm not the one £160m better off :(... now if I HAD been... ;)

At Sonisphere you could pay £2 to use (I presume) a clean toilet... so there obviously is SOME workable business model around this industry!

Oh and that was a minor aside to the main poll which I was actually genuinely interested in, to see if it was women that could be blamed for the dirty toilets they stereotypically so hate :).

Edited by geebus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My point was more that it's a generally absurd idea. :)

The cost of setting up and maintaining a sophisticated camera and swipe card system across that much countryside would be bonkers. You'd also have to develop some sort of software that can analyse pictures and judge what is acceptable and what isn't. I doubt anyone's made such software for festival toilets, so the development costs would be huge too. How would the cameras not get nicked or vandalised either?

I could go on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Activity

    • You do get some weird swings here and there, so... Cypress Hill?
    • It was great, but I don't know why they continue to play Wide Lovely Eyes and Rings of Saturn, which are the weakest of the tracks off both PTSA and ST. Well, I do. It's cos they're about Suzie, so he can sing what he wants. They're the low points of the set. The rest is ace.
    • I didn't this time, but I've seen them before and just because you saw both that night doesn’t mean you can compare them. The Stones were great, but.you didn't think so and you went somewhere else looking for a good time and you found it. For whatever reason you didn't like it, but you were an outlier and all the reviews said they were great.
    • Annie Lennox could be the one to unite the whole forum, nobody has a bad word to say about her, even noted curmudgeon Skip 😄 I'd probably even amble along for a bit meself, and i'm also a miserable sod 
    • If the below link works - thats interesting.   While I don't particularly put much stock in that account as a source (never seen it before though, tbf), and I can pick a hole or two (see below) in what he says - the timing of it is a week before I had the Fontaines '27 stadium info (same stadium he says on there, Tottenham). The info, or part of it, matches up.   Holes I'd pick: I'd have to watch again but I THINK he says 'end of year' for Tottenham - not possible, for a number of reasons, though he's probably just got his words mixed up there. It's Summer '27, or that's what I've been told. He also says Glastonbury is/would be based on how the album does. That doesn't stack up to me, unless it was a 2028 thing. I suppose that could stack up, i.e a verbal agreement for 2028, but still seems a bit of an odd approach. I would personally still expect it to be 2027 alongside the stadium gigs, IF they are gonna do it, though I've still not got a Scooby when the album is gonna drop, only that the tour is due for Spring (or early) next year.   Interesting, nonetheless.   https://www.instagram.com/reel/DaOB3Q9qkwW/
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...