-
Posts
11,326 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
45
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by fatyeti24
-
-
On 1/9/2022 at 10:41 AM, henry bear said:
We were lucky, some locals told us of an alternative route/entry and we by-passed the carnage and drove straight in. I saw Bowie a number of times and this was one of my favourites, mainly because it wasn’t just the usual hits. Subbed by The Prodigy and we managed to catch most of what was to be the last Cocteau Twins gig, in the tented second stage, in between.
I was also at Phoenix in 96, but my memories are slightly different. I definitely remember the queues to get in - my car over heated in the sun and we had to push it into the car park.
We saw the Prodigy, one of the best gigs of the many of theirs I've seen, and I don't remember a small crowd for them (see vid). We didn't watch Bowie because we (then teenagers) just weren't interested in him, and there was quite a strong bill in the dance tent, which was much more our scene. Also Bowie in the 90s.. well why see some 50 year old try his hand at drum n bass when Goldie was on over the way? He also wasn't a rarity on the live circuit either if I recall. I don't know why he had such an apparently small crowd, but it can't just be down to the traffic. Maybe there were more people like us who just weren't there for it.
Also, until I read it on these pages a few years ago, I'd totally forgotten he was actually on the line up.
Good festival, though.
-
20 minutes ago, Matt42 said:
Ok. Page 1 of the Taylor thread
Also some lovely comments on page 1 about Florence when it looked like she was in the frame for 2015.
Do you want me to point to specific posts in these threads?
The worst thing about that Taylor Swift thread s that I actually wrote a hashtag.
I'm sorry, everyone.
-
He left his house at 52 Festive Road, London, headed to the fancy dress shop, put on his cut-off jeans and here we are.
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, MEGABOWL said:
What did Stevie say?
"I love you"
- 3
-
-
11 minutes ago, maelzoid said:
And the Queen has no interest in changing the news cycle at the moment….? Amiright?
Sounds legit. What better way to distract from the alleged behaviours of her progeny than by awarding a knighthood to a guy who stopped being the prime minister 15 years ago.
It's moves like that that have kept Her Maj in the top job for all these years
-
-
1 hour ago, steviewevie said:
*Except Boris Johnson, the c**t.
-
Geidt was apparently considering his position a week or two ago. I know he was appointed as a yes man, but I wonder what's made him change his mind.
-
-
Very sad. She was a good egg.
-
I like that.
-
-
Calls himself Kunt. Releases a tune calling the prime minister a fucking c**t (twice). Goes up against a charity song for Xmas number one.
And still legitimately holds the moral high ground.
Truly the artist of our times.
- 1
-
25 minutes ago, Punksnotdead said:
Please stop - it's supposed to be the season of goodwill ffs!!!!!!
It's the nightmare before Christmas.
-
7 hours ago, Leyrulion said:
Lad baby's criticised the song which makes this quote particularly ironic
"Every year we say this will be the last time, but we keep coming back because the situation keeps getting worse. 7,000 food parcels are handed out every day this Christmas – that shouldn’t be happening in the UK.”
I wonder what could possibly be causing the situation to get worse every year? Maybe if there was some sort of government intervention food bank use might not be rising?
Last year it got to #5 and sadly all they said was "at Number 5 a song about Boris Johnson that's so rude we can't play it on the radio, at number 4..."
He's so close there, Ladbaby, isn't he? So close he can almost taste it.
Give a man a sausage roll and you can feed him at Christmas, show him why the sausage roll is needed and you end up with Kunt.
-
"It's for charity" isn't enough for me to not want LadBaby to fuck off forever.
Close your gaping maw, you onesie clad cretins.
-
17 hours ago, steviewevie said:
Boris Johnson still PM by next spring?
BET NOW!
He's a dead man walking isn't he? At some level the decision has been made, it's just down to the timing now. For the time being he's going to have to be a bullet sponge, soaking up Omicron, Brexit, inflation and the seemingly endless revelations about his conduct, professional and otherwise.
Gone by summer, new person in place by September and conference.
And I'll take that, and will enjoy enormously watching the fucker squirm and suffer.
-
-
2 minutes ago, Quark said:
You are my life goals.
However next time you tell us how busy you are, I'll just be pointing you back to this post 😄
It's autumn now. Easy street 👌
-
I finished work by 11.30 this morning, sat down had a cup of tea and a mince pie and scrolled through the last couple of pages in this thread.
Honestly don't think middle age gets any better.
-
-
I loved that Tony Bennet performance. After several days in the mud and shit (I did spend quite a bit of that weekend in the Dance Tent) it was a wonderful tonic. It gave me, as a then 20 year old, a fondness for crooners that I still have today. The juxtaposition between the world he represented - all spotless shiny suits and Vegas standards, against the hordes of the mud caked, 5 days deep Glasto crowd was something that's not often, if ever, really been repeated on the farm.
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, priest17 said:
Kanye West is modern punk.
Agreed
2022 Headliners
in Chat
Posted
Sports behind paywalls have seen a drop off in casual interest, but have also seen huge revenues from those who really have to see them. If you can and want to pay, they'll squeeze you and squeeze you. It's how Murdoch got really rich. But they know as soon as those rights go elsewhere, so does the audience.
The streaming companies operate differently. They pay for a product to hook viewers into a subscription, but they gamble (correctly so far) that the low cost of that sub means you're much less likely to drop it if your favourite show (or sport or whatever) leaves.
It's why Amazon paid big money for, say, Clarkson and his Top Gear replacement, then let it fade away, cos it was expensive to make and everybody who was going to sign up for it already had done so. It didn't matter if it was still popular as it's new subs they want most.
I dare say Glastonbury could benefit financially from going that way, at least in the short term, but they could benefit financially from all sorts of things, yet they choose not to.