Jump to content

Neil

Member
  • Posts

    14,095
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Neil

  1. 3 hours ago, cellar said:

    He wanted to know if he was one of the people you had on ignore.

    Ignore doesn't stop you seeing posts if you read a topic where they've posted.

  2. 19 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

     

    Now charged with embezzling SNP funds. RIP

    isn't it funny that its taken ten  years for scots to wake up to Scottish indie being a fraud, any half brain should have known that if they'd understood the white paper before the indyref.

  3. 7 hours ago, Nobody Interesting said:

    Some think that green objections to Solar FARMS mean they object to Solar PANELS.

    they do object to the uk govt and Scottish govt net zero plans

  4. 2 hours ago, Alex DeLarge said:

    Blimey Neil. Someone asked for a quote and I posted it. I don't care about the downvote (but thanks to those who have upvoted me) but this is a bit of an odd response to a fairly innocuous post.

     

    Let's just be clear - I couldn't disagree more with Frank Turner's comments there. 

    its not an odd response cos there words are (as said above) absolute horseshit!

  5. 22 minutes ago, lost said:

    Reform on 18 per cent in the red wall now. I wonder if they can overtake the Tories before the election?

    Lots of kippers don't seem to know that reform are the kippers ( not the smartest people, kippers) when they work that one out reform support Will increase.

    IT probably helps them get lost when there's been lots of new odd parties in recent years, English democrats, etc.

  6. 48 minutes ago, bennyhana22 said:

     

    I've done that too as (a) I absolutely detest downvoting and have never done so - if you vehemently disagree, have a conversation about it... - and (b) absolutely non-sensical to consider that someone merely sharing factual information to provide context for an ongoing discussion should receive a downvote!

     

    @Neil - did you realise that @Alex DeLarge was simply relaying a previous quotation verbatim?

     

    Ben

    I realised but its an idiot quotation,by using it he owns it.

  7. 29 minutes ago, Punksnotdead said:

    He didn't omit Paisley. He did omit Busby though, which is unforgivable! 🙂

    True didn't see that.busby is more about "here's what you might have won".

  8. 12 minutes ago, Jacko45 said:

     

    Frightens me death to thinking of a fire in some of those campsites - its so tightly packed. 

    i've seen a few tents go up - decades ago, was probably in the 1980s, but it didn't spread to other tents, luckily.

  9. 9 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

     

    Yes Starmer has negative net popularity, don't they all?

    not all, farage; spaffer; trump; sturgeon, all the dodgy  fruitcakes together. 😛 

  10. 1 minute ago, Nobody Interesting said:

    This site so needs a laughing emoji option on the feedback bit..............................

    you don't need an emoji to laugh at yourself.

  11. 7 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

    Same happened with German greens.

    they did get the nukes shut down, which is probably why the english, and scottish greens won't come up with a net zero plan, they still hope to do the same here.

  12. 8 minutes ago, Nobody Interesting said:

    A new poll for the Standard which includes the following text:

    "Fifty-six per cent say they dissatisfied with the Labour leader (up one point), 25 per cent satisfied (down four points), a net score of -31, and similar to -32 for William Hague and Ed Miliband’s -34 at similar points in their leadership."

     

    A net score of minus 31 - oh dear!!!!

    https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/rishi-sunak-tories-record-low-rating-prime-minister-jeremy-corbyn-poll-b1152246.html

    Still, Starmer is obviously great cos the Chuckle Brothers say so.

    i bet green party members are very pissed of with their own useless anonymous  leaders.

  13. 2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

    I guess point is smaller parties can say all sort of sh*t

    greens in Bristol promise more housing if they win the council elections and then oppose the housing that the council wants to build.

    i guess that's because their housing promise only counts if they win the election, and not because they believe in the need for more housing.

  14. Just now, Nobody Interesting said:

    Internal party policy is not comparible to coalition government.

    Nice try in your open hatred of the Greens.

    it wasn't really the greens i was taking the piss out of. 😛 

  15. 8 hours ago, DareToDibble said:

    difficult to understand.

    also difficult to understand is your omission of shankley and paisley or even dalglish. for your original question easy to understand its cos he managed liverpool, and fans of other clubs can't be as magnanimous.

  16. so compromise is fine for coalition parties, its not fine for labour to compromise with what the electorate will accept, exactly the same reasoning as the scottish greens are doing by not quitting that coalition.

    its funny how the people who advocate compromise only compromise in their own  favour.

×
×
  • Create New...