Jump to content

Neil

Member
  • Posts

    14,097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Neil

  1. 1 hour ago, Ommadawn said:


    I guess the measure is the high level of expectation that things will quickly change for the better. I don't think they will. He's still been dealt the same hand of cards and is going to have to either cut spending or raise taxes (unless he can tap Rayner for some cash).

    Things will change for the better but perhaps not Very quickly.people were unhappy with Blair they didn't feel he was doing enough. But things still improved loads.

  2. 2 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

    You are very mistaken as you will soon find out.

    depends what the measure is?

     

    will he succeed in improving things? yes, things are so bad he can improve them. 🙂 

  3. i'm quite happy living it up on your taxes, suckers 😛 , but i'd be quite happy to have my health and mobility back and have to work.

     

    it is what it is, i'm not a skiver, i've been dealt a sh*t hand, (perhaps contributed to that myself, dunno?)

    hope hes going to be down on  tory ex mp's too  seems to be a lot of them about at the moment enough to  be an identifiable group itself in the stats.

  4. 10 hours ago, steviewevie said:

     

    not sure it doesn't exist...the number off people of work due to illness has gone up more here since the pandemic than others in G7...and that is a problem for those people, and for the economy. Not sure there is an easy answer too, all individual cases, all complicated. We are a sick nation at the moment.

    if people are happy without work why force them, many aren't capable of work and are not considered employable by any known employer. i don't feel that i could deliver the required quality in any work task i might be assigned, not because i don't care, but because certain brain functions have been damaged with my brain injury, i have them detailed in a medical report i have somewhere, i forget what they are one damaged brain function is memory., another is strategic thinking; another concentration; mostly these don't give me much trouble, i try to adapt.

     

  5. It's 4/20 day (I've no idea how those numbers have come to symbolise cannabis?) tomorrow so there's a mass spark up in Bristol's castle park.(And elsewhere).cos I'm in Bristol I hope the old bill are cool and not arresting.

  6. 1 hour ago, Nobody Interesting said:

    I am sure Beryl down the job centre will know if you are sick or not..............................

    The announcement from Sunak is just more pointing the finger of blame at people whose fault it isn't to panda to those who think everyone else but them is to blame for how sh*t things are.

    hes trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.

  7. 40 minutes ago, kemosabe said:


    To an extent. It also rewards big groups trying together too. I dunno how you change that though. 

    the current system isn't perfect but is probably around the best it can get for distributing tickets without being random - with advantages random can't do, like getting tickets for the people you want to go with.

  8. 16 minutes ago, Avalon_Fields said:

    Definitely not. Most years I go on a French site for a major sports event, randomly allocated queue. Longest I’ve been in the queue was around 6 hours. Ridiculous. 

    i presume in that instance everyone has to wait while the thousands of people before them do their full transaction?

     

    still wouldn't satisfy everyone wanting glasto tix  cos there's fewer tickets than people.

  9. 3 minutes ago, kemosabe said:


    To an extent. It also rewards big groups trying together too. I dunno how you change that though. 

    random allocation can be gamed too! - people will find ways to make it work for them.

  10. 20 hours ago, airwaves said:

    Look what the site says "places in queue allocated randomly" 

    How about that for Glasto ticket sale?? 

    its a terrible idea, you've made clear you really want to go to glasto, with random allocation you'll lose out to someone who's not too bothered about going.

     

    the system as it is now, rewards people who try hard (who are probably people who really want to go).

  11. Just now, Nobody Interesting said:

    Retired people under state pension age who can afford to retire

    yeah, blame thatcher and her "retire at 55" scheme. people took her at her word it was always obvious that it would cause problems.

  12. 6 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

    Maybe sorting out NHS so people didn't have to wait months/years would help.

    maybe a better upstanding of the demographic and social effects from an aging population would help.

  13. 1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

    Bypass GPs..get someone else to determine whether someone is actually sick or just needs to pull themselves together.

    the nhs  won't employ people with long term conditions, so why would private employers??

  14. Just now, steviewevie said:

    Looks like this will be part of Tory manifesto and election campaign, get back to work you bloody skivers.

     

    its the way to f**k up the GP system even more than currently.

     

  15. 8 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

    Another poor sign that Labour will be much different from what we have now.
     

    I despair.

    because every election has to deliver what just-you want, and the thoughts of the rest of the electorate don't matter a fig. better known as how labour let the tories win an 80 seat majority.

  16. 4 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

    Another poor sign that Labour will be much different from what we have now.
     

    I despair.

    best thing labour can do to replace the tories is to  say f**k you to the electorate. what would you be willing to give up to get that youth mobility deal?

×
×
  • Create New...