Derek Reynolds
-
Posts
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by Derek Reynolds
-
-
Cell phones - school? How old do you think I am? The pocket calculator hadn't been invented, and ball point pens were not allowed! But that never stopped me learning, and one thing that stands out is: it's a waste of time teaching pigs to sing.
I haven't had time to check out all the links you supplied as yet, but I did look at the cellular phones page of the American Cancer Society. I will be accused of 'cherry picking', but this statement stood out:
"It is not clear at this time that RF waves from cell phones cause harmful health effects in people, but studies now being done should give a clearer picture of the possible health effects in the future. Until then, there are several things that people who are concerned about RF waves can do to limit their exposure. "
Further from WHO ref:
" While an increased risk of brain tumors is not established, the increasing use of mobile phones and the lack of data for mobile phone use over time periods longer than 15 years warrant further research of mobile phone use and brain cancer risk. In particular, with the recent popularity of mobile phone use among younger people, and therefore a potentially longer lifetime of exposure, WHO has promoted further research on this group. Several studies investigating potential health effects in children and adolescents are underway. "
And from the EC:
" Conclusion The current database is inadequate for the purposes of the assessment of possible risks due to environmental exposure to RF, IF and ELF. "
Some of these statements are 17yrs old, others 9. Lots happen in nine years. The connect between a laser and 5G EMF beams is valid - they seek, and pin-point their targets. There is clearly a lack of long term effects and data therefrom.
Someone accused me of being a Troll. That is their opinion, but having read elsewhere of the 5G coverage at Glastonbury I thought it might be received with some sort of interest. Instead I got a volley of verbal abuse and outright denial on all counts. Hence pigs and singing.
Have a healthy life. (At least, try).
-
3 hours ago, EasyUserName said:
That is an opinion. It doesn't follow that it is a true statement. Do you have anything to back up your assertion that this partly-UK government funded study is not going to be impartial? Because, based on what you've posted so far, you are happy to post items as "facts" that are clearly very biased.
Do you have the original paper? Anything that *isn't* a YouTube link? I mean, it's technically possible to find YouTube videos talking about "conspiracy theory nutters", and as amusing as that is, that's not a fact.
That website is laughable. Again, it might as well be a YouTube video. I especially liked this part of the linked article:
" This technology, when fully implemented, could intrude into people’s privacy by revealing their location to those who want to know where and when someone travels. In addition to tracking one’s movements, it has the potential for providing access to everything one does with cell phones, computers, or other electronic devices that are in our homes. "
Has Mr. Thomas been living under a rock? Has he heard of a mobile phone? The internet? Big data systems? Maybe he could ask Alexa. Honestly, you need to provide some better links!
You do realise that your internet provider, phone provider or even Facebook knows plenty about you.
I apologise if you are a Troll, although I do enjoy a good trawl through conspiracy things when I get the chance. Sadly work prevents me usually, but the post-Glaso lull is allowing me a dable.
At least your first bunch of links had a nice "sudo-science" feel about them. This last lot is lacking in scientific, backable information (& is a decade out of date on the privacy angle! Better check with Siri to see what she has to say about it all...)
Well, that sounds like a lot of opinions and bias. Papers? For a visual lecture? Ask the author.
Research as much as you like, but you will only believe what you want to believe in.
-
4 hours ago, bluedaisy said:
For your information (make of it what you will)...
I'm taking part in large global, long term study which is looking into the effects of mobile phone radiation. This study is funded by various governments including the UK Department of Health, and in collaboration with various universities and the World Health Organization.
"COSMOS (“Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Health”) is an international cohort study investigating the possible health effects of long-term use of mobile phones and other wireless technologies."
"There is extensive public and scientific interest in the possibility that RF-EMF from mobile phones might increase the risk of disease, results until now are inconclusive."
"Many studies have concluded that there is no convincing evidence to date that mobile phones are harmful to health. However, the widespread use of mobile phones is a relatively recent phenomenon and it is possible that adverse health effects could emerge after years of prolonged use. Furthermore, it has been difficult to assess exactly how much people used their phones (the COSMOS study is using improved method to assess mobile phone usage of participants)."
As soon as you mention government funded, you are opening yourself up to what governments want you to know, and that's not necessarily what you NEED to know.
The UK Department of Health; The World Health Organisation, and COSMOS, are all part of the disinformation network intended to keep you dumbed down. Dr. Davis talks for one hour to an audience in Australia just over four years ago, and shows clinical images that present evidence of 3G & 4G mobile phones which have caused medical conditions.
Dr. Davis is a professor of medicine, and an internationally recognised expert on radiation from mobile phones and other wireless devices:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY
5G is a whole different beast to either of the previous. The wave form is directional through beam formation - columnated pulses - like a laser, unlike 3 &4G which is spread wide with a limited range. The basics can be watched here in a few minutes from Radwin5000 sales vid. NOTE: Before you watch this, mute the sound, and see if you can't see something the voice-over, and background nicey-nicey music covers up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=171&v=Sy41rlOzLIs
Some more info: http://www.theeventchronicle.com/uncategorized/can-new-5g-technology-smart-meters-used-weapons/
Smart meters. No so smart if you value privacy.
-
3
-
-
1 minute ago, tumbles said:
Nah sorry my brain is fried from the non ionising radiation this weekend.
Not the beer then! In fencing (not the garden or field type) when your opponent has scored a hit to your person with his/her foil, you call out 'touché!' to denote he/she has touched you - scored.
-
Tremendous!
-
1 hour ago, tumbles said:
Touché
Look up the meaning of touché.
1 hour ago, paulshane said:You are a temendous idiot.
I think you mean - tremendous?
22 minutes ago, frostypaw said:I've done some research and the earth looks flat from here and there are some guys online saying it is - they even have a youtube
There's an entire society devoted to it. Don't buy it myself.
Sawdustysurfer might be interested in this (or not, whatever).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvQ3Eb2j2jw
Adios from the tremendous touché. And remember: don't learn a little - learn a lot.
-
On 6/25/2019 at 1:39 PM, Michaelgball said:
The effect on humans will be extremely minimal. I work at BT/EE and sell 4G masts to large businesses, moving onto 5G now and none of the IT professionals i have worked with have any concerns about the effects of 5G on their staff. In fact, not a single person has questioned the health issues and are just really excited to take advantage of a great piece of technology
You sound like a very gullible young man Michael. Do some research.
-
Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:
No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.
-
1
-
-
Someone suggested I did some research. These are papers and websites that have done research into the effect of EMF, particularly on the most vulnerable - children.
https://ehtrust.org/france-new-national-law-bans-wifi-nursery-school/
https://www.scribd.com/document/182641315/RNCNIRP-Russia-Wi-Fi-Regulation-19-06-12-pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22112647,26199911,24460421,22465825,24490664
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24792079,26578367,23479077,26520617
http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17994&
https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/j/reveh.2016.31.issue-3/reveh-2016-0011/reveh-2016-0011.pdf
Enjoy your festival. Take some Sun cream. (Hats, tin-foil or otherwise, optional).
-
Glad you're all so positive - I'll pass on the hat though.
-
People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.
Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.
https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks
To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI
5G map of the UK:
https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/
And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog
-
8
-
5G @ Glastonbury 2019
in Chat
Posted
So this is what - guesswork?
From one of the links supplied by Frostypaw.
The American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Result(s)
The comparisons of mean sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology among four different cell phone user groups were statistically significant. Mean sperm motility, viability, and normal morphology were significantly different in cell phone user groups within two sperm count groups. The laboratory values of the above four sperm parameters decreased in all four cell phone user groups as the duration of daily exposure to cell phones increased.
Conclusion(s)
Use of cell phones decrease the semen quality in men by decreasing the sperm count, motility, viability, and normal morphology. The decrease in sperm parameters was dependent on the duration of daily exposure to cell phones and independent of the initial semen quality.