Artists chatting to the audience
114 members have voted
-
1. How do you like artists to interact with the crowd at a gig?
-
I want them all to be like sprinty Dave and chat to me between each song. Even though like the boor in the pub I’ve heard the same story 100 times before
-
I think The boss has got it nailed a bit of a chat sometimes to give involve and entertain me
-
Ellie has got it spot on lets her music do the talking and has other band members do the chatty bits
-
ELO all the way. I’m paying to hear music not waffle
-
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Latest Activity
-
-
One better! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FEH1pkzjE8Cy1AlQSHAtQPC80cgnRjfVr5QYWJETJH4/edit?usp=sharing all help appreciated :) -
Hopefully we’ll have luck tomorrow. I’ve been lucky once in 5/6 years, so it has to change!!! -
I'm relatively new here, and this might make me unpopular, but here goes: As a left-wing Jew one concern I have about this year's Glastonbury is the likelihood that I'll be exposed to the combination of ignorance and antisemitism that has been allowed into the open, particularly on the British left, in the last six months. That's not to say that Israel's government, military, settlement policies etc etc don't deserve strong criticism and Palestinians strong support, and I am expecting to see both, but people have to be very careful with their language if they want to avoid causing offense. At Coachella for example towards the end of Young Fathers' set Graham Hastings shouted "Ceasefire now!" and "Free Palestine!". I don't really have an issue with that, but I'd say that ideally it should be something like: Ceasefire now - Free the hostages - Overthrow Hamas - Free Palestine. Hastings didn't say anything that suggests he supports Hamas or that he does not support innocent Israelis, but I did find the omissions curious (and I find the perception among some on the left that Hamas are defending the oppressed rather than another means of oppression completely bizarre). Really I think if someone with a significant public profile wants to state their opinion they should ideally make the effort to actually form one, something cohesive and suggestive of independent thought and genuine conviction, rather than just say a couple of random slogans. With Paul Currie, I think he clearly handled that moment poorly, but nothing I have read has remotely convinced me it demonstrated that he is an antisemite. I also have very profound issues with the Campaign Against Antisemitism's methodology. "We have contacted Paul Currie for comment", as they put it in their initial release about the incident, is nowhere near good enough, given the potential (and actual) impact of that release on Currie's career. There is real and rational fear of rising antisemitism in the British Jewish community, and while intending to protect them from the antisemitism the CAA also sometimes seem willing to weaponise the fear. Finally, I hope people avoid the temptation to make inflammatory and unnecessary comments, such as the one I've quoted above. It isn't necessarily antisemitic, but there was no need in the context of the rest of the post to make it at all and it seems, at best, wilfully provocative. Happy to discuss any of this either online or over a pint on the farm. -
By Ayrshire Chris · Posted
Got to agree with the monsters of rock comment. Absolute pish fest. And T in the park was known to many as P in the park, so much aerial urine. I could never understand how you could launch a pint cup of it without soaking yourself.
-
-
Latest Festival News
-
Featured Products
-
Hot Topics
-
-
Latest Tourdates
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.