Jump to content

BBC cutting songs from sets...


turricandan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 6/29/2022 at 1:21 PM, Barry Fish said:

Your mind can play tricks on you to be honest.  Youre in a totally different head space in the middle of the action at a festival. 

Yeah can't totally discount it.  Some truth in both our view points here probably.

I noticed this at Arlo Parks but thought at the time maybe the actual stage sound on the day. I even thought maybe she was having trouble with her voice. Thourougly enjoyed it whilst there but on playing it back there was definately some sound issues, was it the beeb playback? I'm not sure 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, gizmoman said:

It pains me to admit it but Neils right, the whole gig is prerecorded (other than the percussionists), I watched it yesterday and wasn't sure so checked again today, just compare the Glastonbury  gig to the one on youtube from Stockholm, exactly the same vocals, same timing, phrasing etc, I'll give Tennant credit though, he's a pro, I was watching first time yesterday looking for a slip and there was only once he was slightly off.

Lots of shows run prerecorded in some way, either per-song or the entire show. For example, Chemical Brothers recent shows are a set sequence from start to finish - they press play and the entire show runs like clockwork with all the visuals working in sync. The live part is how they tweak and mix the elements, trigger samples, overlay synth parts etc.

For PSB, they're doing something similar, it's one or more pre-recorded sequences with all the visuals in sync, while they're adding live elements including percussion, various keyboard parts from Chris, and Neil's lead vocals. I really don't think he's miming, at least not much of it. It mostly sounds very live and there are subtle differences between shows if you listen carefully - remember these are classic songs he's sung hundreds of times, so the phrasing and timing will be pretty much set.

I think it's perfectly OK to perform in this way, it makes for a more spectacular show to have everything pre-planned, sounding good, with great visuals synchronised. The credibility hinges on how much of a live element is included, how sophisticated the visuals are and the overall aesthetic. PSB pass this test with a great show, including plenty of live elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, autoinflate said:

Lots of shows run prerecorded in some way, either per-song or the entire show. For example, Chemical Brothers recent shows are a set sequence from start to finish - they press play and the entire show runs like clockwork with all the visuals working in sync. The live part is how they tweak and mix the elements, trigger samples, overlay synth parts etc.

For PSB, they're doing something similar, it's one or more pre-recorded sequences with all the visuals in sync, while they're adding live elements including percussion, various keyboard parts from Chris, and Neil's lead vocals. I really don't think he's miming, at least not much of it. It mostly sounds very live and there are subtle differences between shows if you listen carefully - remember these are classic songs he's sung hundreds of times, so the phrasing and timing will be pretty much set.

I think it's perfectly OK to perform in this way, it makes for a more spectacular show to have everything pre-planned, sounding good, with great visuals synchronised. The credibility hinges on how much of a live element is included, how sophisticated the visuals are and the overall aesthetic. PSB pass this test with a great show, including plenty of live elements.

I've no problem with the music being largely pre-recorded/pre-programmed for a band like the PSB, it would be impossible for Chris to do it all live, and I agree it was a great show, but I think an audience have a right to expect live vocals, I don't even have a problem with Neil "double tracking" his vocals by singing along to a recording if thats what it take to get the right sound but if he is just miming to the same vocals at every gig that is not acceptable IMO.

So the question is "is he miming", my initial thoughts (before Neils comments) were that he probably was, the vocals sounded too good, so I had a good look at the BBC recording and wasn't sure, saw one point that I thought was sus but the rest looked good, but as you say "these are classic songs he's sung hundreds of times, so the phrasing and timing will be pretty much set" and that applies just the same if he's miming, he can get it looking pretty spot on (and it's difficult to maintain that throughout a 90 min set). After I saw Neils comment I checked again and have come to the conclusion he is miming, as I said I'm not happy to say that, I'm pretty disappointed with them. Just had another look now and if you look carefully during "So Hard" there are a couple of points where his vocals don't match, at 26.17 he mouths "and you" too early and at 28.25 he goes a bit too early again, not very far off but enough to raise doubts. I could spend an hour or two reviewing the recording and picking out other examples but I've got better things to do and to be honest they are not that easy to spot, he is very good.

At the end of the day it's down to the individual to decide whether miming is acceptable if it means a better sounding show, some people don't care, I do, I think it's cheating, I'd sooner hear a real live voice even if it isn't perfect.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, gizmoman said:

Just had another look now and if you look carefully during "So Hard" there are a couple of points where his vocals don't match, at 26.17 he mouths "and you" too early and at 28.25 he goes a bit too early again, not very far off but enough to raise doubts. I could spend an hour or two reviewing the recording and picking out other examples but I've got better things to do and to be honest they are not that easy to spot, he is very good.

 

Nah, I disagree, for the first one he just opens his mouth wide, drawing breath, before signing the 'and you'. For the 28.25 he does an exaggerated gesture before the line, which makes it look a bit off.

More to the point, all the way though the show the vocals just sound live, with volume variations due to mic technique, weak/flat notes here and there, particularly in the lower register as is typical of live vocals. He sings very well though, especially for his age, which I guess is why people think he's miming.

Edited by autoinflate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, autoinflate said:

Nah, I disagree, for the first one he just opens his mouth wide, drawing breath, before signing the 'and you'. For the 28.25 he just does an exaggerated gesture before the line, which makes it look a bit off.

More to the point, all the way though the show the vocals just sound live, with volume variations due to mic technique, weak/flat notes here and there, particularly in the lower register as is typical of live vocals. He sings very well though, especially for his age, which I guess this is why people think he's miming.

You're right! I just checked the Glasto 2010 performance to see how it compared, he is clearly singing live and sounds great, I'm sorry I doubted and humbly apologise (to Neil T that is) he clearly does have an amazing live voice, quite surprising when people never really rated him as a singer on record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, gizmoman said:

You're right! I just checked the Glasto 2010 performance to see how it compared, he is clearly singing live and sounds great, I'm sorry I doubted and humbly apologise (to Neil T that is) he clearly does have an amazing live voice, quite surprising when people never really rated him as a singer on record.

Haha, i was doing the same (watching 2010 for comparison) and I noticed that he often does these little facial expressions / mouth moves, just before delivering a line, which makes it look like he's a bit off. Can see it particularly in the chorus of Suburbia towards the end of the song.

As for his voice, I think it's one of the most interesting and unique voices to emerge from the 80s or even since. There are many technically better singers, but who else sounds like him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blutarsky said:

Nice, thanks. That wasn't there earlier in the week - it was a 60 minute show with 30 minutes of Arlo Parks and 30 minutes of IDLES. 

Think the tv footage is very different to the website footage. We have abandoned the tv footage in favour of just watching the individual sets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pinhead said:

Maybe, maybe not - depends on the criterion they use so as not to upset their incumbent paymasters.

They got complaints when Stormzy just stepped on stage. So there would never b e a shortage of complaints whether its just performing while black or speaking about the realities of the current state of affairs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched some of the Charlie XCX set (I hadn’t seen it live) quite sad to see the amount of miming going on. On Gone she’s just singing tiny sections and letting the backing track fill in the gaps.   It doesn’t feel right to have such an over reliance on backing tracks for the lead vocal.  
I'm going to have to go and look up what overdubbing is compared to miming if that’s what Billie’s set had.  It looked to me like she was miming some songs when I was watching live, she shouted something like “get that vocal track out of there, why is that even playing?” on one track.  

Didn’t think Neil from PSB was miming tho, he had some backing vocals for odd bits with vocal effects (like Heart) but you can hear weaker bits of vocal and slightly duff notes here and there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PassingCloud said:

I saw Jarvis has to change the lyrics of his song at the request of the BBC, but if you saw the Amyl & The Sniffers set they used a massive load of c**t. I mean, they are Australian so perhaps it’s allowed. 

Probably more that he is a seasoned broadcaster as well so knows the headaches it could cause. I was there and was pretty surprised that the crowd behaved with it too. But then he had plied us with sweets and compliments by then. I was looking forward to bellowing out the uncensored version but it was still cathartic singing about pricks. Better fitting given RvW too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2022 at 2:40 PM, Neil said:

just wondering if songs have been cut from sets because of use of the n word or similar? the beeb are very hot on that at the mo.

Also hot on not annoying the tories 'cause license fee.

On 6/30/2022 at 11:17 PM, Pinhead said:

They're running the coverage through their 'political expediency' filter just in case someone criticises...

Not just me then.

On 7/1/2022 at 8:48 AM, Suprefan said:

So pretty much any artist that spoke about human rights this weekend eas essentislly blocked. Got it.

Maybe.

On 7/1/2022 at 8:38 PM, CaledonianGonzo said:

Lorde telling the Supreme Court to do one is intact in her set 

Maybe I'm just paranoid then?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah a lecture on Human Rights might not go down too well with a government about to replace the international definition with one of their own 'taking back control' interpretations. They hate judges and lawyers telling them what to do however (as in golding them to account), so they might be happy with Lorde...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • my wife and I put two Oxfam volunteering spots in the pot today as we managed to secure tickets in the resale on Sunday, fingers crossed they show up for you soon!
    • We’re after 1 Oxfam spot for my wife, having secured one myself back in Feb.   We’ve been weighing up whether to stick or twist with the cutoff coming up.    Your words sound encouraging though so we might have to stick it out and hammer the Oxfam site for that 1 spot! 
    • This gives us hope! We're lucky enough to work on our laptops all day so this is all possible!
    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...