Jump to content

Music Festivals given go ahead from late May...


Chrisp1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Simsy said:

You're saying what I'm thinking. If they don't bring in vaccine passports until everyone (or at least all adults) has been offered a jab, and if uptake remains high, there's not much point using them domestically. We should have enough people jabbed to reach herd immunity.

Even when everyone has been offered a jab not everyone will have had one some people can't have it and they'll have the alternative of proving themselves safe with a test

6 minutes ago, Simsy said:

Completely understand if they're brought in for international travel. It's going to be years before the virus is suppressed globally, so proving your vax status to get into a country (and avoid quarantine when returning to UK) makes sense.

Yes if they're going to exist tonascess other countries it makes sense to make use of them internally where they can be useful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

As they're being mooted mostly for indoor places the benefit is allowing access to indoor places in weaver watt than would otherwise be the case and not scientifically aquestiosble there's plenty of science to back up the limited effectiveness of vaccines and that transmission happens easier in enclosed spaces.getting life back to more normal isn't pointless. Were all desperate to get back to normal if we can. And this would help us take a bg step we can't safely take otherwise.

 

I think you've misunderstood what I'm trying (perhaps failing!) to say, Neil. I understand that the imposition of passports could be used as a tool to reopen different forms of venues. I'm saying that, scientifically, by the time they're introduced, their actual usefulness in disease control and prevention, given the U.K. trajectory and the sole justification of restrictions (health service protection) would be negligible. 

There will undoubtedly be a rise in cases with every step of unlocking. There 'should not' be a corresponding, unmanageable rise in hospitalisation and death, given the % of vulnerable vaccinated and the ongoing rise in general population protection. 

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bennyhana22 said:

I think you've misunderstood what I'm trying (perhaps failing!) to say, Neil. I understand that the imposition of passports could be used as a tool to reopen different forms of venues. I'm saying that, scientifically, by the time they're introduced, their actual usefulness in disease control and prevention, given the U.K. trajectory and the sole justification of restrictions (health service protection) would be negligible. 

 

 

Stopping cases rising again and the associated deaths from that isn't negligable

It's better we test unlocking in the safest ways we can than go too easy and regret it further lockdowns aren't reallyan option for control In the future

Just now, bennyhana22 said:

 

 

 

 



There will undoubtedly be a rise in cases with every step of unlocking. There 'should not' be a corresponding, unmanageable rise in hospitalisation and death, given the % of vulnerable vaccinated and the ongoing rise in general population protection. 

Ben

We know the vaccine isn't perfect if it proves better than current assumptions then vaccinpasslorts stop being as useful. And can be abandoned asap no on will want them to hang around when it needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

My argument would be, internally, by say, mid-July on current domestic trajectory, what is that 'benefit'? Any perceived safety benefit will be cosmetic at best and highly scientifically questionable at worst. 

Vaccine passports for being able to travel across borders where infection and vaccination rates may differ hugely from your own country? Sensible. 

 

 

The benefit is lowering risk and fears of risk

2 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

 

 


Vaccine passports to be allowed to move and mingle within your own borders? Utterly pointless. 

Ben

Not pointless they lessen risk within things people like to do. And allow people's jobs to restart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

 

The benefit is lowering risk and fears of risk

Not pointless they lessen risk within things people like to do. And allow people's jobs to restart.

Again, you're slightly misrepresenting what I'm saying, Neil. They only allow people's jobs to restart if the govt decide to impose them in order for people's jobs to restart. That and a scientific need for the passports are not necessarily the same thing...

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bennyhana22 said:

Again, you're slightly misrepresenting what I'm saying, Neil. They only allow people's jobs to restart if the govt decide to impose them in order for people's jobs to restart. That and a scientific need for the passports are not necessarily the same thing...

Ben

Riim not trying to misrepresent you I'm trying to counter what you are saying quite vaguely you talk about science without being explicit with what you're referring to so I have to take a guess at itrightright from the start there's Been the idea that big gatherings are more risky that doesn't appear to be the case from the facts of things which have happened people have tried too pin things on Cheltenham and failed. People won't feel comfortable to attend events like that without extra safeguards in place and passports can be that extra safeguards? Without people feeling comfortable to attend there is no job to restart.there is no scientific need not to catch the virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eFestivals said:

Ben you'd have loved an argument aboubout compulsory seartbelts the science was against them.the lives saved since shows that science as tosh.

Ha! Yeah I get you, of course. I'm not saying they don't have their uses, and if one of those is to increase public confidence and so facilitate an earlier and more successful recovery for the entertainment and hospitality sectors, then it's a no-brainer. My frustration is two-fold: (a) I don't believe that, medically, they will have a material impact by the time they're introduced and (b) I just cannot see this bunch of chumps doing anything other than making an absolute fuck-up of their development and implementation!

Ben
x

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

The point is that by mid-July there will be no justifiable 'need' to restrict activity for people being close together, any more than for any other infectious disease. We will not achieve zero COVID anymore than we will achieve zero any other infection. By mid-summer, the risk on a population level in terms of quantitative and qualitative impact on the NHS 'should' be negligible compared to, say, sepsis. 

Therefore, no justification. And anti-COVID measures in hospital cannot be described simply as 'a failure'. In the initial stages of the pandemic, we were shit. Now, we're not. Trust me, I spend all day every day making sure that we're not...

Ben

This 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

I'm saying that, scientifically, by the time they're introduced, their actual usefulness in disease control and prevention, given the U.K. trajectory and the sole justification of restrictions (health service protection) would be negligible. 

There will undoubtedly be a rise in cases with every step of unlocking. There 'should not' be a corresponding, unmanageable rise in hospitalisation and death, given the % of vulnerable vaccinated and the ongoing rise in general population protection. 

I assumed they were going to cover the "iffy" period between opening up the highest risk mass events on 21st June and either the end of July when everyone has had 1st dose or September time when everyone has gone through twice. That will be when we know that there definitely isn't an unmanageable increase in hospitalisation rates. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

My argument would be, internally, by say, mid-July on current domestic trajectory, what is that 'benefit'? Any perceived safety benefit will be cosmetic at best and highly scientifically questionable at worst. 

Vaccine passports for being able to travel across borders where infection and vaccination rates may differ hugely from your own country? Sensible. 

Vaccine passports to be allowed to move and mingle within your own borders? Utterly pointless. 

Ben

Best go apply for an opening on Downing St’s Pr team cause theyll hire you straight away. 
 

We can get into the whole insurance side of things, but you’ll likely say its a bunch of shite. 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

Could also get into the whole thing of you living in a country that has a lot more surveillance than others outside of China or Russia. Better go back to flip phones if you think freedoms are being infringed upon.

Edited by Suprefan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Suprefan said:

Best go apply for an opening on Downing St’s Pr team cause theyll hire you straight away. 
 

We can get into the whole insurance side of things, but you’ll likely say its a bunch of shite. 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

Could also get into the whole thing of you living in a country that has a lot more surveillance than others outside of China or Russia. Better go back to flip phones if you think freedoms are being infringed upon.

Yeah @bennyhana22, ya massive Tory!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

Ha! Yeah I get you, of course. I'm not saying they don't have their uses, and if one of those is to increase public confidence and so facilitate an earlier and more successful recovery for the entertainment and hospitality sectors, then it's a no-brainer. My frustration is two-fold: (a) I don't believe that, medically, they will have a material impact by the time they're introduced and (b) I just cannot see this bunch of chumps doing anything other than making an absolute fuck-up of their development and implementation!

Ben
x

While paying their mates a hefty fucking fortune to implement it. Probably before aborting their efforts and using software that’s already available. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Suprefan said:

Best go apply for an opening on Downing St’s Pr team cause theyll hire you straight away. 
 

We can get into the whole insurance side of things, but you’ll likely say its a bunch of shite. 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

Could also get into the whole thing of you living in a country that has a lot more surveillance than others outside of China or Russia. Better go back to flip phones if you think freedoms are being infringed upon.

Without being that guy, and in no way intending to be discourteous, old pal, are you fucking joking?!

Ben
x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, gibble said:

... and they've cited the lack of government support as the reason for cancellation. I'm hoping it's not the case but I guess a lot of others will follow.

I can foresee a mid-late summer littered with festival organisers wistfully reflecting on the fact that they could have run their events, but the shameful lack of govt underwriting just left them in such a precarious position that they had to pull the plug.

@Suprefan - I hope that's not tarnishing my Tory credentials in your eyes 😉

Ben

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, gibble said:

... and they've cited the lack of government support as the reason for cancellation. I'm hoping it's not the case but I guess a lot of others will follow.

 

5 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

I can foresee a mid-late summer littered with festival organisers wistfully reflecting on the fact that they could have run their events, but the shameful lack of govt underwriting just left them in such a precarious position that they had to pull the plug.

@Suprefan - I hope that's not tarnishing my Tory credentials in your eyes 😉

Ben

Totally agree, and there are more cancellations to come. Even events later in the season, into August/September will just not take the risk.
It's too much of a gamble for them, risk everything on trying to operate this year after already missing out in 2020, or play safe for 2022 and secure the long term future of their event. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bennyhana22 said:

I can foresee a mid-late summer littered with festival organisers wistfully reflecting on the fact that they could have run their events, but the shameful lack of govt underwriting just left them in such a precarious position that they had to pull the plug.

@Suprefan - I hope that's not tarnishing my Tory credentials in your eyes 😉

Ben

Agreed, i know its a huge risk but I fully believe we'll have a summer full of festivals, sadly the fluidity of the situation is going to make it hard for organisers to take the risk, could the government be pressured into it like they have other things? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moovin festival is on the August bank holiday weekend but they've decided to throw a nice little all day-er mid July as 'they simply couldn't wait' till then. 

Always wanted to go Moovin as its just down the road but August bank hol is already stacked with options. Will definitely be checking this out though.

image.thumb.png.9bdd503342a36b7ce200ceab09fd2fb7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
    • K.O.G. were one of my favourite acts at EOTR a couple of years ago. Just a joyful afrobeat danceathon
    • Can tell you about a 1.5k ticket if you're interested lad? Not more at face value I don't think, sorry! Although if I hear owt else back I'll drop you a message 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...