Jump to content

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, sisco said:

Depends what part/role.  We’re introducing Hybrid working, no particulars on days in the office have been recommended/agreed.  A document is being produced at the moment 

Yep seems to be that central government is catching is catching up with local government in that regard now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, stuartbert two hats said:

I think it may, but as I think other people were getting at, the football has been a pretty good testing ground for a looser regime.

 

It may surprise a few on here, but I'm occasionally prone to wild outbursts of optimism (you can find me being wrong in my hopeful predictions many times on this thread). So I'm going to predict the next loosening will raise the ceiling, but not by much and then cases will drop. The models are being pessimistic and everything will be fine.

I think this might be the government’s plan. Open up everything during the summer months and let the wave hit its peak, while they’re on their summer recess and can shirk responsibility again, and then come back while it all starts to level up - “Get Covid done”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ryan1984 said:

I think this might be the government’s plan. Open up everything during the summer months and let the wave hit its peak, while they’re on their summer recess and can shirk responsibility again, and then come back while it all starts to level up - “Get Covid done”.

If they aren't bodies in the street, they don't care

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, sisco said:

Depends what part/role.  We’re introducing Hybrid working, no particulars on days in the office have been recommended/agreed.  A document is being produced at the moment 

fortunately at my place it really has returned to how it was pre pandemic, we're only a small office within a biggish global company and focus is off us from head honcho ceo bloke in US who was panicing last year about empty offices and places like ours were set to be closed permanently. So, as long as you don't take the piss, people work from home sometimes...sometimes they gives a reason, and sometimes they don't, I usually don't. There are some who prefer to go in, others like me who don't, unless I need to get away from the family. So, today I'm working from home...mainly cause I want to get a long run done at lunchtime! As long as the work gets done and timescales get met then there isn't a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, zahidf said:

https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/new-covid-19-variant-may-have-emerged-in-north-east-surge-1094420/amp

 

3 days before the reopening decision and they've found a new variant!

I'm sure the news will be picked up fake SAGE soon and they'll be 30 tweet threads saying why we should all double.mask and stay away from people for a couple more years. They must be rubbing their hands with glee

well, risk of new variants that are more infectious, or worse if better at evading vaccines, is going to be higher with more of the virus around. Christina Pagel was tweeting the other day about how rapid rise of cases in NE was worrying. She didn't mention rubbing her hands with glee though. Hopefully if this is a new variant, the vaccines are still good against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tories’ beloved market forces will determine whether people will go back to work in offices. If the employees and employers want them to, they will, if it’s not right for the company or employer, they won’t. 
 

The Tories can’t have their cake and eat it. If it’s not good for companies to work at home, they won’t let their employees do so. Unlike the people on here who think people working at home are skiving, companies are very keen to get as much as possible from staff to survive and so if they don’t think they are by them being at home, they’ll call them back in from the 19th 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barry Fish said:

It's quite important people realise this.  It's not all about covid and there is a balance that must be had.

There have been quite a few kids catching Campylobacteriosis from petting zoo's in north wales (friends kids have caught it). Apparently their doctors have said kids immune systems are shot to shit and would normally not get sick like this. Especially covid babies who have basically never mixed and lived in environments that have been bleached to all hell. 

All the lockdowns have made people more susceptible to all the other illnesses out there.. its time to rebalance things I think. We really really do have to live with Covid. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

well, risk of new variants that are more infectious, or worse if better at evading vaccines, is going to be higher with more of the virus around. Christina Pagel was tweeting the other day about how rapid rise of cases in NE was worrying. She didn't mention rubbing her hands with glee though. Hopefully if this is a new variant, the vaccines are still good against it.

I think the big issue with these variants, for which there's no answer, is the amount of time it takes to truly work out whether they're more infectious/deadly/evade vaccines. If we're going back to normal-ish then there's a lot of time between discovery/investigation and finding out we have a problem, by which time it's too late.

If we were to find one with significant vaccine escape during a time of no restrictions, it'd be everywhere before we could do anything about it. We really just have to hope for the best on that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JB15 said:

Tories’ beloved market forces will determine whether people will go back to work in offices. If the employees and employers want them to, they will, if it’s not right for the company or employer, they won’t. 
 

The Tories can’t have their cake and eat it. If it’s not good for companies to work at home, they won’t let their employees do so. Unlike the people on here who think people working at home are skiving, companies are very keen to get as much as possible from staff to survive and so if they don’t think they are by them being at home, they’ll call them back in from the 19th 

I’d broadly agree with this. But for certain companies it seems the decision is being made more on the basis of the CEO’s personal opinions & ideology rather than a dispassionate analysis of productivity 🙄

Ultimately market forces will tell, if inflexible businesses start losing talent to competitors then it will drive change in the long run. Might take a while past the 19th though! 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

I think the big issue with these variants, for which there's no answer, is the amount of time it takes to truly work out whether they're more infectious/deadly/evade vaccines. If we're going back to normal-ish then there's a lot of time between discovery/investigation and finding out we have a problem, by which time it's too late.

If we were to find one with significant vaccine escape during a time of no restrictions, it'd be everywhere before we could do anything about it. We really just have to hope for the best on that 

yeah..definitely. I mean, the vaccines have been pretty robust against all variants so far...and hopefully they will have vaccines in future for all possible variants, or differenct vaccines for dominant variants or whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

I think the big issue with these variants, for which there's no answer, is the amount of time it takes to truly work out whether they're more infectious/deadly/evade vaccines. If we're going back to normal-ish then there's a lot of time between discovery/investigation and finding out we have a problem, by which time it's too late.

If we were to find one with significant vaccine escape during a time of no restrictions, it'd be everywhere before we could do anything about it. We really just have to hope for the best on that 

I agree with you, but you have to accept that us being susceptible to a virus (whether that be a mutation of Covid or new one entirely) is part and parcel of living on this planet. The scenario you have mentioned is no different to how things were pre Covid life, and its how we got here into this mess in the first place. If we want to live and interact, then the risks will always be there. 

Edited by st dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I work in recruitment and the genie is out of the bottle in terms of WFH – already we're seeing huge amounts of people shifting jobs and prioritising ones that offer either flexible working/hybrid/etc. One of the first questions people are asking now is if the business has WFH options.

Even if they're forcing people back in this year, companies will need to adapt long term or face a serious brain drain, basically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

 

I think the big issue with these variants, for which there's no answer, is the amount of time it takes to truly work out whether they're more infectious/deadly/evade vaccines. If we're going back to normal-ish then there's a lot of time between discovery/investigation and finding out we have a problem, by which time it's too late.

If we were to find one with significant vaccine escape during a time of no restrictions, it'd be everywhere before we could do anything about it. We really just have to hope for the best on that 

Spot on. This is the point everyone needs to accept: going for full steam ahead & reopening is a gamble.

From everything I’ve read, the odds are in our favour - vaccines seem to work against variants. And I can’t argue that there’s many economic and wellbeing benefits to reopening. 

But, but but… If the dice come up wrong then we’re fucked. 🤷‍♂️

We’ll just have to hang on for the ride and see where we are in a few months. I really hope we get away with it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jimmillen said:

Spot on. This is the point everyone needs to accept: going for full steam ahead & reopening is a gamble.

From everything I’ve read, the odds are in our favour - vaccines seem to work against variants. And I can’t argue that there’s many economic and wellbeing benefits to reopening. 

But, but but… If the dice come up wrong then we’re fucked. 🤷‍♂️

We’ll just have to hang on for the ride and see where we are in a few months. I really hope we get away with it!

This virus wasn't just like flu like people were saying at the beginning, but the vaccines have now made it much more like flu, and something we can live with...(hopefully).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, st dan said:

I agree with you, but you have to accept that us being susceptible to a virus (whether that be a mutation of Covid or new one entirely) is part and parcel of living on this planet. The scenario you have mentioned is no different to how things were pre Covid life, and its how we got here into this mess in the first place. If we want to live and interact, then the risks will always be there. 

 

27 minutes ago, jimmillen said:

Spot on. This is the point everyone needs to accept: going for full steam ahead & reopening is a gamble.

From everything I’ve read, the odds are in our favour - vaccines seem to work against variants. And I can’t argue that there’s many economic and wellbeing benefits to reopening. 

But, but but… If the dice come up wrong then we’re fucked. 🤷‍♂️

We’ll just have to hang on for the ride and see where we are in a few months. I really hope we get away with it!

 

24 minutes ago, Barry Fish said:

The alternative options are no less of a gamble and this is something you seem to choose to ignore.

Its not like its justifiable or even a realistic option to stay nice and locked up forever.

Yeah I think my point was a bit lost in that - less saying we should stay locked up and more along the lines of we really need this variant fear in the media to stop. If a bad one comes up there's literally nothing we can do about it and while I'd expect plans in place from the top, scaring the public daily with potential bad ones isn't going to help anyone when there are no restrictions to mitigate them. We only need to know at the point there is a confirmed issue (if that happens)

Edited by efcfanwirral
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jannybruck said:

I work in recruitment and the genie is out of the bottle in terms of WFH – already we're seeing huge amounts of people shifting jobs and prioritising ones that offer either flexible working/hybrid/etc. One of the first questions people are asking now is if the business has WFH options.

Even if they're forcing people back in this year, companies will need to adapt long term or face a serious brain drain, basically.

I turned down a job last week partly because although they had flexible working it wasn't at all guaranteed. Job ad said "2-3 days a month in the office" but I could have been in the office zero days one month and 20 days the next. The employer lied through their teeth in the ad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

This. Fuck Sunak.

Slimy c**t.

I'd much rather my Tories stab me in the front with their awfulness, rather than his fake dishy-Rishi bullshit. 

Give me Patel over him any day, at least she's so clearly fucking awful that it's impossible to hide. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...