Jump to content

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, Freddyflintstonree said:

Well put, and completely agree...though my question is still whether the correct actions pointed out above would have been enough to save the festival this year. 

Of course it's an open question, I don't really expect a definitive yes or no. I guess you answered in your first sentence! 

Yes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

Well put, and completely agree...though my question is still whether the correct actions pointed out above would have been enough to save the festival this year. 

Of course it's an open question, I don't really expect a definitive yes or no. I guess you answered in your first sentence! 

Ha yeah I do think that if those actions had been different then the festival would go ahead. Ignoring the summer for a bit if we had a government that had stamped down on the virus hard in late Autumn and had a ban on household mixing at Christmas we potentially would've been in a much better situation now so as such the festival build starting in a month or so would've been more likely to have happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

Ha yeah I do think that if those actions had been different then the festival would go ahead. Ignoring the summer for a bit if we had a government that had stamped down on the virus hard in late Autumn and had a ban on household mixing at Christmas we potentially would've been in a much better situation now so as such the festival build starting in a month or so would've been more likely to have happened. 

OK fair enough, that's interesting. If the gov had played all its cards right (ha) then what impact do you think covid would have had on the festival with regards to international acts as well as covid safety? (masks etc.) do you think it could have been a non issue entirely? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

Do we really believe that any government in the UK could have controlled Covid so dramatically differently so as to have allowed for a Glastonbury to go ahead this year? 

I will be the first to say Boris has been an utter, utter shambles, and that it could have been handled 100+ times better than it has been, but based on the very nature of Covid and how it's developed across the world.. I think I'd argue Glastonbury was never going to be possible this year. 

I'd love to have a genuine discussion about this if there really is a strong feeling it could have with a better government. (Just to reiterate, Boris and the government are a steaming turd, that's not my question). 

I would tend to agree with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Freddyflintstonree said:

OK fair enough, that's interesting. If the gov had played all its cards right (ha) then what impact do you think covid would have had on the festival with regards to international acts as well as covid safety? (masks etc.) do you think it could have been a non issue entirely? 

I think that by the summer as we are now things will be markedly better with fairly loss restrictions in place through the summer so with testing I could see international acts coming over to play. International sports still goes ahead so I think we could musicians travelling round. The difference being that because the measures taken by the government weren't good enough it means that the conditions aren't right for the festival work to be started when it normally would with case numbers and an over-stretched NHS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thailand. Same population as UK. Island. Important trading nation very closely located to some of the continent’s biggest manufacturers and exporters. Closer to original outbreak than UK. 

Adopted a Zero COVID approach. Controlled its borders. Implemented effective track, trace and contain. 

Total COVID deaths since beginning of pandemic: 71 

That could have been the UK. We had enough of a warning to prepare even better than the Thais. We didn’t. 

So next time someone says “Boris (like he’s their fucking mate) is doing the best he can, and I don’t think anyone would have done any better”, tell them there are 197 countries in the word and currently the leadership of 196 of them are doing a better job than our corrupt stinking bunch of c**ts. 

And they’re trying to weasel away from the blame and shift it to “rule breakers” when their guidance throughout has been in-comprehensive, flawed and flouted without consequence by the powerful. 

@Copperface
@Freddyflintstonree

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Copperface said:

Incidentally, I had a flu jab recently and the nurse had to ask whether I gave consent to be administered an unlicenced flu vaccine. It turns out they have run out of normal flu vaccine, whatever that is, and the MHRA have done an emergency authorisation to use a US flu jab which is not UK licenced. I still had it though. Anyone else had the same?

It's not that they have run out, this was approved back in October,

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/flublok-vaccine-given-authorisation-for-temporary-supply-in-the-uk-to-meet-public-health-need

It's also a relatively new technology -Recombinant DNA rather than the usual inactived flu version.

https://www.sanofiflu.com/flublok-quadrivalent-influenza-vaccine.html

Why they felt the need to use a new unlicensed vaccine is open to question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gizmoman said:

 

Why they felt the need to use a new unlicensed vaccine is open to question.

She said it was all they had. Yep, Flublok is the one.

Edited by Copperface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, blutarsky said:

Thailand. Same population as UK. Island. Important trading nation very closely located to some of the continent’s biggest manufacturers and exporters. Closer to original outbreak than UK. 

Adopted a Zero COVID approach. Controlled its borders. Implemented effective track, trace and contain. 

Total COVID deaths since beginning of pandemic: 71 

That could have been the UK. We had enough of a warning to prepare even better than the Thais. We didn’t. 

So next time someone says “Boris (like he’s their fucking mate) is doing the best he can, and I don’t think anyone would have done any better”, tell them there are 197 countries in the word and currently the leadership of 196 of them are doing a better job than our corrupt stinking bunch of c**ts. 

And they’re trying to weasel away from the blame and shift it to “rule breakers” when their guidance throughout has been in-comprehensive, flawed and flouted without consequence by the powerful. 

@Copperface
@Freddyflintstonree

I'm certainly not absolving them of anything. The Thai example is valid but the closest comparators in general terms are our European neighbours.

It's been pretty crap there.

But more important is that it has been way more crap here in the UK. In fact we have broken the crap measuring scale. the Thais followed the scientific advice and took quick action. Our lot were too concerned about the economic impact and didn't fully appreciate it. I think the Thais were all too aware of pandemics after bird flu etc and were far more alert to the potential. 

I don't think any of the current candidates we had for government would have been able to do a Thailand but it might have been just a bit 'less bad'. Was always difficult to see something like Glastonbury being a goer whoever we had in charge.

Edited by Copperface
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Copperface said:

Incidentally, I had a flu jab recently and the nurse had to ask whether I gave consent to be administered an unlicenced flu vaccine. It turns out they have run out of normal flu vaccine, whatever that is, and the MHRA have done an emergency authorisation to use a US flu jab which is not UK licenced. I still had it though. Anyone else had the same?

Yeah, I had it a couple of weeks ago.  Was a bit freaked out by the “if you get any side effect other than a sore arm, we really need to know about it” part of the spiel but got nothing other than a pretty sore arm and that only lasted a couple of hours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those on the frontline have been elevated, but we're not saints. Just normal people doing a job. And we do get bad thoughts....

"I can't save you so will you hurry up and die so I can get on with saving someone who may live"

"Wonder how many are still alive when I go in tomorrow"

When I realise the thoughts running through my head I don't feel human anymore.

Mrs L

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gizmoman said:

It's not that they have run out, this was approved back in October,

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/flublok-vaccine-given-authorisation-for-temporary-supply-in-the-uk-to-meet-public-health-need

It's also a relatively new technology -Recombinant DNA rather than the usual inactived flu version.

https://www.sanofiflu.com/flublok-quadrivalent-influenza-vaccine.html

Why they felt the need to use a new unlicensed vaccine is open to question.

It’s was only unlicensed in the EU at the time though, it’s been approved by the FDA for use in the US for a few years (so it’s not really a new vaccine). The EMA actually issued a full market authorisation (not a conditional one) for it a few weeks after the MHRA issued the temporary  authorisation...if you were still in the EU, it wouldn’t be “unlicensed”. I had the same shot myself this year, no issues. It was partly developed for people with egg allergies as previous non-recombinant versions of the flu shot used eggs to grow virus which was then chemically inactivated. Presumably, the temporary authorisation given back in October by the MHRA was in anticipation of shortages of other flu shots. It’s more or less the same as one of the vaccines Sanofi were going to re-tool for COVID (they also have an mRNA vaccine heading into trials now). 

Edited by Toilet Duck
Clarification!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

It’s was only unlicensed in the EU at the time though, it’s been approved by the FDA for use in the US for a few years (so it’s not really a new vaccine). The EMA actually issued a full market authorisation (not a conditional one) for it a few weeks after the MHRA issued the temporary  authorisation...if you were still in the EU, it wouldn’t be “unlicensed”. I had the same shot myself this year, no issues. It was partly developed for people with egg allergies as previous non-recombinant versions of the flu shot used eggs to grow virus which was then chemically inactivated. Presumably, the temporary authorisation given back in October by the MHRA was in anticipation of shortages of other flu shots. It’s more or less the same as one of the vaccines Sanofi were going to re-tool for COVID (they also have an mRNA vaccine heading into trials now). 

Yes the government did a deal to buy 60 million doses of the Sanofi/Gsk Covid vaccine back in July, the cynic in me thinks maybe the deal was done on the basis the UK bought X number of flu jabs to guarantee preferential supply of the Covid jab! I'm sure such things never happen though! Strangely Flublok is called Supemtek in the EU, maybe they can charge different prices in different markets if the name is different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, blutarsky said:

Thailand. Same population as UK. Island. Important trading nation very closely located to some of the continent’s biggest manufacturers and exporters. Closer to original outbreak than UK. 

Adopted a Zero COVID approach. Controlled its borders. Implemented effective track, trace and contain. 

Total COVID deaths since beginning of pandemic: 71 

That could have been the UK. We had enough of a warning to prepare even better than the Thais. We didn’t. 

So next time someone says “Boris (like he’s their fucking mate) is doing the best he can, and I don’t think anyone would have done any better”, tell them there are 197 countries in the word and currently the leadership of 196 of them are doing a better job than our corrupt stinking bunch of c**ts. 

And they’re trying to weasel away from the blame and shift it to “rule breakers” when their guidance throughout has been in-comprehensive, flawed and flouted without consequence by the powerful. 

@Copperface
@Freddyflintstonree

The other thing to note with Thailand is that tourism contributes from 17-20% of GDP and they still went with this strategy because they accepted early that Health policy is Economic policy. You can't have a functioning economy with a disease running unchecked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • my wife and I put two Oxfam volunteering spots in the pot today as we managed to secure tickets in the resale on Sunday, fingers crossed they show up for you soon!
    • We’re after 1 Oxfam spot for my wife, having secured one myself back in Feb.   We’ve been weighing up whether to stick or twist with the cutoff coming up.    Your words sound encouraging though so we might have to stick it out and hammer the Oxfam site for that 1 spot! 
    • This gives us hope! We're lucky enough to work on our laptops all day so this is all possible!
    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...