Jump to content

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

Just now, Fuzzy Afro said:

I read that article and thought of you @crazyfool1!! Never for a second realised it’s actually is you 😂😂

 

Very small world because the girl Liv from Ipswich is actually a friend of a friend as well 

it wasn't .... read my small print :) .... although I could have written it easily  word for word :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, onthebeach said:

Ah - thank you so much - are the commercially available ones using very much the same testing criteria  even though the method for taking the bloods are different?

I will probably get one as an early Christmas present!

I haven’t been paying a massive amount of attention to the antibody tests as it’s become clear that they are probably of limited use to reliably see what infection levels have been like (more likely a snapshot of the last 6 months). Most of the sample at home, send vial of blood away tests use ELISA, which is how I would do it in the lab, and it what would be performed if a healthcare professional sent your blood to the lab...so yes, exactly the same, just different sample collection method. There are some that are chromatographic cassettes, I get emails about them from suppliers, however not entirely sure if the are available to the public yet (could be!). A box of 10 of those costs about €180 ex vat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zoo Music Girl said:

I'm interested in this too as I'm pretty sure my partner has had it (not so sure about me, but think it would be weird if I hadn't got it from him). We had blood taken for the ONS study last week and am now wondering if it might show up negative even if we have had it, due to the antibodies fading.

Entirely possible that antibodies could be gone. Also, believe it or not, it’s not actually as contagious as you think it is. Most studies show household contacts only get infected less than 10% of the time. This was observed at the start in Wuhan, but we weren’t really sure if it was accurate. A bunch of studies now show this. Basically, some people are just massively infectious (super-spreaders) and most people aren’t. The super-spreaders are enough to make the infection as a whole pretty contagious, but at an individual level, most people aren’t. What the difference is between very infectious people and everyone else is one of the big unanswered questions about this weird disease! (Probably a combination of biology, behaviour and environment)...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

We had a similar bug going round the office in Jan and all thought it was COVID. However one of the guys that was ill then picked up a bug from his wife in April and tested positive for COVID. So I guess it couldn’t have gone round our office.  

My missus caught something horrible back in late feb, she had this constant cough, shortness of breath, was out of it for a few days...all that sort of stuff, but she did have a fair amount of snot too. I also caught it I think but not as bad as her, but did have a cough I couldn't get rid of and shortness of breath too, but also some snot. But...I think there was all sorts of bad colds and bronchial bugs going round then so not sure...and will probably never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

My missus caught something horrible back in late feb, she had this constant cough, shortness of breath, was out of it for a few days...all that sort of stuff, but she did have a fair amount of snot too. I also caught it I think but not as bad as her, but did have a cough I couldn't get rid of and shortness of breath too, but also some snot. But...I think there was all sorts of bad colds and bronchial bugs going round then so not sure...and will probably never know.

I had what sounds like the same thing in mid Feb, albeit I was pretty much back to normal within 36 hours of my symptom onset. I tested negative for the antibodies in August, but am now wondering if I actually did have covid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

I haven’t been paying a massive amount of attention to the antibody tests as it’s become clear that they are probably of limited use to reliably see what infection levels have been like (more likely a snapshot of the last 6 months). Most of the sample at home, send vial of blood away tests use ELISA, which is how I would do it in the lab, and it what would be performed if a healthcare professional sent your blood to the lab...so yes, exactly the same, just different sample collection method. There are some that are chromatographic cassettes, I get emails about them from suppliers, however not entirely sure if the are available to the public yet (could be!). A box of 10 of those costs about €180 ex vat. 

Are you in any way worried about the fact that antibodies is being talked about so much in the press, and people in general seeming so horrified that they don't last? We all obviously know about t cells thanks to you, but do you think this focus on antibodies could have an effect on how UK politicians lift restrictions? And do you still think we'll be opening up when vulnerable are vaccinated or do you think there will be public clamour for everyone to be first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

If anyone’s interested this is a pretty decent thread on the differences between 2020 and 2016 for the Presidential election.

 

Thanks for this!

I’m still of the mindset that Biden will win on any objective level, but Trump will still cause soooo much carnage between now and January, I still don’t see Biden being the one at inauguration as the forgone conclusion...

Theres just no scenarios I can see - even a electoral collage walloping - that has Trump conceding gracefully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

Are you in any way worried about the fact that antibodies is being talked about so much in the press, and people in general seeming so horrified that they don't last? We all obviously know about t cells thanks to you, but do you think this focus on antibodies could have an effect on how UK politicians lift restrictions? And do you still think we'll be opening up when vulnerable are vaccinated or do you think there will be public clamour for everyone to be first?

I’m not really worried, but it’s not entirely a surprise. I guess it needs to be explained a bit better to the public in general. Antibody levels shouldn’t really impact on opening up any time soon, as we still don’t fully understand how our immune system responds to this virus (my own guess is that it’ll end up like most CoVs and we keep t-cells long term but not antibodies for any great length of time). In terms of how things open up once a vaccine is available, hospitalisations and long COVID are the main drivers of caution. Once the frontline and the most vulnerable are protected, unless our hospitals are still overwhelmed and we see large morbidity from infection, I’d expect us to get back towards normal. That can be mitigated by using both the vaccine and advance rapid testing, so I’d still expect immunity passports and test results for travel for a bit, and maybe even for high risk activities until we can vaccinate enough of the population to not have to worry anymore (well, I think we’ll still have to worry in the same way we worry about flu)...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

I’m not really worried, but it’s not entirely a surprise. I guess it needs to be explained a bit better to the public in general. Antibody levels shouldn’t really impact on opening up any time soon, as we still don’t fully understand how our immune system responds to this virus (my own guess is that it’ll end up like most CoVs and we keep t-cells long term but not antibodies for any great length of time). In terms of how things open up once a vaccine is available, hospitalisations and long COVID are the main drivers of caution. Once the frontline and the most vulnerable are protected, unless our hospitals are still overwhelmed and we see large morbidity from infection, I’d expect us to get back towards normal. That can be mitigated by using both the vaccine and advance rapid testing, so I’d still expect immunity passports and test results for travel for a bit, and maybe even for high risk activities until we can vaccinate enough of the population to not have to worry anymore (well, I think we’ll still have to worry in the same way we worry about flu)...

Ok, ToiletDuck...this may be an impossible question..but what do you estimate are the timescales for all this...i.e. when do you think we'll get back to something that looks like normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Toilet Duck said:

I’m not really worried, but it’s not entirely a surprise. I guess it needs to be explained a bit better to the public in general. Antibody levels shouldn’t really impact on opening up any time soon, as we still don’t fully understand how our immune system responds to this virus (my own guess is that it’ll end up like most CoVs and we keep t-cells long term but not antibodies for any great length of time). In terms of how things open up once a vaccine is available, hospitalisations and long COVID are the main drivers of caution. Once the frontline and the most vulnerable are protected, unless our hospitals are still overwhelmed and we see large morbidity from infection, I’d expect us to get back towards normal. That can be mitigated by using both the vaccine and advance rapid testing, so I’d still expect immunity passports and test results for travel for a bit, and maybe even for high risk activities until we can vaccinate enough of the population to not have to worry anymore (well, I think we’ll still have to worry in the same way we worry about flu)...

Thanks  for the detailed response as always! So you reckon we're all taking it then? 

I know they're very rare, but would the rates of strange responses in the younger age ranges be seen as an acceptable risk/consequence? I know some people have odd immune responses like GBS etc to vaccines, but could even a handful of them put the risk of a vaccine higher to younger people than the virus itself? 

Edited by efcfanwirral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Radiochicken said:

Thanks for this!

I’m still of the mindset that Biden will win on any objective level, but Trump will still cause soooo much carnage between now and January, I still don’t see Biden being the one at inauguration as the forgone conclusion...

Theres just no scenarios I can see - even a electoral collage walloping - that has Trump conceding gracefully.

You’re welcome.

I share those concerns, there seems nothing in Trumps DNA that would mean he is a sporting loser. The one hope is by then that the Republicans decide to reign him in so they can protect their own image!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Ok, ToiletDuck...this may be an impossible question..but what do you estimate are the timescales for all this...i.e. when do you think we'll get back to something that looks like normal?

This is impossible to predict as going back to normal will be based on new Covid infection rate data going forward. Having a vaccine is no guarantee infection rates will decline quickly. Indeed it could be argued we will only see a slow decline in covid infections as the initial vaccine roll out targets the vulnerable ( & healthcare workers), a group who have been most proactive in minimising their risk of infection. Furthermore, vaccine roll out could itself cause a further spike in covid 19 cases as unvaccinated people become more carefree with hygiene and social distancing etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Lycra said:

This is impossible to predict as going back to normal will be based on new Covid infection rate data going forward. Having a vaccine is no guarantee infection rates will decline quickly. Indeed it could be argued we will only see a slow decline in covid infections as the initial vaccine roll out targets the vulnerable ( & healthcare workers), a group who have been most proactive in minimising their risk of infection. Furthermore, vaccine roll out could itself cause a further spike in covid 19 cases as unvaccinated people become more carefree with hygiene and social distancing etc.

How’s things at the hospital going?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Toilet Duck said:

I haven’t been paying a massive amount of attention to the antibody tests as it’s become clear that they are probably of limited use to reliably see what infection levels have been like (more likely a snapshot of the last 6 months). Most of the sample at home, send vial of blood away tests use ELISA, which is how I would do it in the lab, and it what would be performed if a healthcare professional sent your blood to the lab...so yes, exactly the same, just different sample collection method. There are some that are chromatographic cassettes, I get emails about them from suppliers, however not entirely sure if the are available to the public yet (could be!). A box of 10 of those costs about €180 ex vat. 

Thank you again - I’ll check out if there any local ‘in person’ tests available 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Ok, ToiletDuck...this may be an impossible question..but what do you estimate are the timescales for all this...i.e. when do you think we'll get back to something that looks like normal?

Well, if all 3 early vaccines actually make it over the line (which no longer looks impossible, I’d be cautiously optimistic that they are safe and at least work a bit), then that speeds things up as we don’t have to dump masses of doses that were made at risk, instead we can use them all (so there’s probably 2-3 hundred million ready to go between them...SII has a 100m doses of the Oxford one ready to go tomorrow). Also means that only one company isn’t responsible for making the next batch to expand the programme, but all can be made at the same time (and most of them suggest they can make about 250-300m in the first half of the year, SII claim they can churn out 1.5b doses per annum, so there should be a billion+ doses of the different ones available in H1 2021). Still will need prioritisation as it’s not enough to vaccinate the whole world, but enough to put a big dent in morbidity and mortality. By next summer, the major players in the vaccine game are due to roll out their vaccines, and if repeated doses are required, then these will probably be the ones that take over. It’s not entirely fanciful to think that by Easter we could be in decent shape (not done and dusted, but a combination of Spring and a vaccine-protected frontline and vulnerable population changing the outlook a good bit)...certainly by summer, if all of these early vaccines work, I’d be surprised if things didn’t look at lot more normal. Plenty of time for something completely unexpected to turn up, but cautiously optimistic that we are entering into the endgame of how we actually deal with this in the long term. And that’s just improvements based on a vaccine, we still haven’t had the full benefit of advance rapid testing yet, but more are becoming available, so between the two advances, plenty to be cheerful about.

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • my wife and I put two Oxfam volunteering spots in the pot today as we managed to secure tickets in the resale on Sunday, fingers crossed they show up for you soon!
    • We’re after 1 Oxfam spot for my wife, having secured one myself back in Feb.   We’ve been weighing up whether to stick or twist with the cutoff coming up.    Your words sound encouraging though so we might have to stick it out and hammer the Oxfam site for that 1 spot! 
    • This gives us hope! We're lucky enough to work on our laptops all day so this is all possible!
    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...