Jump to content

When will this shit end?


Chrisp1986

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

actually, it's really cheap compared to other things.

And don't forget, they'll be having to payout similar amounts if the people on furlough are shifted to being people on the dole.

Surely it's an additional cost they don't need to be paying and paying people 80% for the next 6-12 months is going to cost the government more than people being on the dole. I know there are more costs involved but it's cheaper than 1-2k per month per person

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gyms and leisure facilities are currently as I type putting forward the case to be allowed to stay open - the final decision on gyms won't be known until 8pm - for those of us that run sports clubs it's a nail biting next few hours.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2020/09/21/gyms-leisure-centres-pushing-stay-exempt-new-lockdown/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 5co77ie said:

exactly as Neil says above the shift to dole payments is pretty comparable - and of course if we stopped paying for trident that would free up £2.75 billion a year.

Also dole payments have an indefinite end date, whereas furlough can be planned and budgeted for future years.
Really wouldn’t be surprised to hear an announcement on extending the scheme for the hospitality sector in the coming weeks, and pubs and restaurants being forced to close again. 

Edited by st dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 5co77ie said:

Gyms and leisure facilities are currently as I type putting forward the case to be allowed to stay open - the final decision on gyms won't be known until 8pm - for those of us that run sports clubs it's a nail biting next few hours.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2020/09/21/gyms-leisure-centres-pushing-stay-exempt-new-lockdown/

Closing gyms would be such a dumb policy. Take away the place that people go to avoid obesity and then act surprised when the mortality rates goes up. Wow 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@foolee once you start calculating for housing benefit and other needs as well as admin costs it does start to add up when you’re subsidising wages. It also would depend if you’re on minimum wage or not. 
 

I was earning vastly more on furlough even at 80% than I would have been if I was on UC or whatever they call it now and with my housing costs covered. I actually managed to clear some debts because I wasn’t going anywhere so my monthly spend dropped by a significant amount.  
 

Someone furloughed from a minimum wage job would struggle. Even worse if they are on a zero hour contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, st dan said:

Also dole payments have an indefinite end date, whereas furlough can be planned and budgeted for future years.
Really wouldn’t be surprised to hear an announcement on extending the scheme for the hospitality sector in the coming weeks. 

To be honest I think the hospitality industry closedown is a right Tory mates back scratching - many pub and restaurant chains ran their businesses with no cases. However Tim Wetherspoon's empire had 22 establishments epicentre outbreaks, so to ensure their mates uneasy alliance stays on board - they thought they'd level the playing field by tarring the competition as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fuzzy Afro said:

Closing gyms would be such a dumb policy. Take away the place that people go to avoid obesity and then act surprised when the mortality rates goes up. Wow 

judging by the other Nations the sectors being looked at are the sectors where outbreaks have occurred. Wasn't it the Welsh who read their whole list out of sectors where transmission occurred - and how they intended to mitigate it, wish the English would be a bit more transparent like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, foolee said:

Surely it's an additional cost they don't need to be paying and paying people 80% for the next 6-12 months is going to cost the government more than people being on the dole. I know there are more costs involved but it's cheaper than 1-2k per month per person

it's not only dole vs furlough as the cost comparison, tho.

If jobs collapse, the govt will be paying out on dole for a lot longer than they'll need to pay furlough. Then there's the costs of creating new jobs, lost tax revenues from many directions, etc, etc, etc.

I've got my fingers crossed that a furlough extension will be announced, although I'm not expecting that before the start of October as the govt will want to reduce the furlough numbers as much as possible, and it might also be limited by sector.

(if they do sectors, then it's hugely likely that 'entertainment' will be one of them ... but I'm not hopeful of this entertainment-based website being included in whatever criteria they use :( )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 5co77ie said:

Gyms and leisure facilities are currently as I type putting forward the case to be allowed to stay open - the final decision on gyms won't be known until 8pm - for those of us that run sports clubs it's a nail biting next few hours.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/2020/09/21/gyms-leisure-centres-pushing-stay-exempt-new-lockdown/

Wouldn't this be announced in Parliament at 12.30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re furlough vs dole, it's also about people spending.   Those on more modest incomes keep the economy afloat. When 'normal' people have a few extra quid, they spend it, which benefits everyone. When the rich have extra money, they save it.

Ensuring people continue to have an income means they keep spending and putting money back into the economy when we need it.  It's a worthwhile investment in terms of economic recovery - much more so than, say, giving people £5 off a burger.

If people don't have spare cash, they stop spending, which means more redundancies, more people no longer spending and so the cycle continues.

Extending the furlough scheme, or moving to some sort of universal basic income, is a no brainer in terms of keeping the economy ticking over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eFestivals said:

it's not only dole vs furlough as the cost comparison, tho.

If jobs collapse, the govt will be paying out on dole for a lot longer than they'll need to pay furlough. Then there's the costs of creating new jobs, lost tax revenues from many directions, etc, etc, etc.

I've got my fingers crossed that a furlough extension will be announced, although I'm not expecting that before the start of October as the govt will want to reduce the furlough numbers as much as possible, and it might also be limited by sector.

(if they do sectors, then it's hugely likely that 'entertainment' will be one of them ... but I'm not hopeful of this entertainment-based website being included in whatever criteria they use :( )

That makes sense.

I think it makes sense to get as many people as possible working and let a scheme continue for the jobs that really need it. Rather than certain businesses basically takings the piss out of the system when they earn a healthy profit every year and were still doing so through most of covid-19 with the exception of complete lockdown. I understand the entertainment industry need it as they can't really run businesses with social distancing or working from home so there should be a scheme for that. I just don't like that some businesses are using it to their advantage and a chance at getting employees to work harder to see if they can make redundancies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, efcfanwirral said:

I'm guessing the government hoped it would be over by now, but as it's not and it looks like we're in the "new normal" for quite a long time, the free market kicks in? 

The issue for government is the old normal has gone and we are in a transition period to a new normal which will emerge of the pandemic is over. How much of the old normal survives  evolving to the new normal is a huge issue for government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FakeEmpire said:

Re furlough vs dole, it's also about people spending.   Those on more modest incomes keep the economy afloat. When 'normal' people have a few extra quid, they spend it, which benefits everyone. When the rich have extra money, they save it.

Ensuring people continue to have an income means they keep spending and putting money back into the economy when we need it.  It's a worthwhile investment in terms of economic recovery - much more so than, say, giving people £5 off a burger.

If people don't have spare cash, they stop spending, which means more redundancies, more people no longer spending and so the cycle continues.

Extending the furlough scheme, or moving to some sort of universal basic income, is a no brainer in terms of keeping the economy ticking over.

Exactly = let's just give everyone a Universal Basic Income forever - no more furlough, no more dole - much better plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shoptildrop said:

On the topic of masks was in my local co-op yesterday and staff in the aisles were finally wearing masks which was good

not sure if this is related to the questionnaire send from Co-op of what I thought of their covid measures last week - generally I think they are good but suggested aisle workers wear mask given how small the store is - this week they are in masks so maybe they have listened?

Can you write one to my store :) if we get nothing from Boris :) ... it might be company policy has changed ... I’ve seen nothing about coop one as yet 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FakeEmpire said:

Ensuring people continue to have an income means they keep spending and putting money back into the economy when we need it.  It's a worthwhile investment in terms of economic recovery - much more so than, say, giving people £5 off a burger.

to be fair, the 'eat out' thing was less about putting money into the economy and more about trying to encourage people to stop hiding at home - and it seems to have succeeded with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 5co77ie said:

Exactly = let's just give everyone a Universal Basic Income forever - no more furlough, no more dole - much better plan.

For UBI to work effectively, how much regulation would be required around things like rent and utilities?  My understanding is that the principle of UBI is that it largely (if not totally) covers the absolute basics, removing the need for multiple different benefits.

Given that housing benefit can be viewed as basically subsidising rent and allowing landlords or the property market to inflate accordingly, what's to stop those things continuing to happen so that UBI is no longer enough to fund those basic requirements?

Guess that's a long way of asking "what's to stop free markets fucking up UBI?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...