5G @ Glastonbury 2019

[Roger G Lewis]

4 hours ago, eFestivals said:

You share the opinion of the tin-foil-hat brigade, i know.

You're concerned about non-existent EU censorship, but you're not concerned about spreading harmful fact-free bollocks.

Isn't it great that you've got your priorities right?  

Well that sets my mind at rest, thanks, its been an education.

I can rest easy tonight knowing you have all the bases covered and that Theresa May, Mark Sedfield and Olly Robinson will keep the sterling work up whilst we wait for Boris or Jeremy to take over.
 

Its always warming to find such open minded tolerance in the bosom of my fellow socialist brothers and sisters, Makes you proud so it does.
 

 

[Gnomicide]

7 hours ago, Roger G Lewis said:

I take that as a huge compliment coming from someone who clearly has no argument to field.

[Roger G Lewis]

The States Guide to Trolling the Web, GCHQ and NSA 101

 

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/93bBrBn5Qcdz/

 

 

 

 

 

So long and thanks for all the fish.

Edited July 5, 2019 by Roger G Lewis

[eFestivals]

8 hours ago, Roger G Lewis said:

Its always warming to find such open minded tolerance in the bosom of my fellow socialist brothers and sisters, Makes you proud so it does.

oh, so you're another of these 'socialists' who think racist hateful Fake Tommy is a god...?  

I'm open minded. We might be invaded by aliens at any moment, so we should all immediately build bunkers to hide in, just in case.

After all, if 5g's a huge risk just on the possibility, then the same and more applies with far-more-dangerous aliens.

See, open-minded, me.  

[eFestivals]

18 minutes ago, Roger G Lewis said:

oh look, it's another one of those fact-free tweets.  

Want to tell us all about that "EU military unification"?

And also, perhaps you could explain how-come you don't consider NATO to be 'military unification' when NATO is far-tighter than anything the EU have talked about doing (but haven't done).

[Roger G Lewis]

oh, so you're another of these 'socialists' who think racist hateful Fake Tommy is a god...?

No not at all , I think Tommy is a useful idiot in many repsects, On the problem with wahabi salifism though he does have a point and has reaped the establishments wrath because of his making the point effectively.

 

Regarding 5g, the age old question is Que Bono, who benefits? It is not necessary for the internet of things but has uses in surveillance security mapping in real time. another interesting one is Fracking? or the tidal barrage project in Swansea bay. Whose priorities are being served by 5G is an interesting question, Who's do you think the 5g roll out serves and similarly those other projects.

 

[Roger G Lewis]

Quote

oh look, it's another one of those fact-free tweets.

Read the link and watch the film, them's the facts.

[eFestivals]

5 minutes ago, Roger G Lewis said:

No not at all , I think Tommy is a useful idiot in many repsects, On the problem with wahabi salifism though he does have a point and has reaped the establishments wrath because of his making the point effectively.

Fake Tommy claims all Muslims are the same dangerous just because they're Muslims.  

6 minutes ago, Roger G Lewis said:

Who's do you think the 5g roll out serves

Ultimately the customer.  

Because they'll be no 5g roll-out if the customer doesn't want it. Corporations invest money on roll-outs to get a return.

It doesn't need a conspiracy for us customers to be mugs for the new and shiny - and everything of our society is built on that basis.

You might as well be asking "Newton's theory of gravity, who does it serve"?

[eFestivals]

Just now, Roger G Lewis said:

Read the link and watch the film, them's the facts.

There is no "EU military unification".

I pointed out the fact-free at headline level, which proves there's no truth to be found by delving deeper.  

[frostypaw]

If you look at the rate this guy posts here, posts on twitter and posts blogs does anyone actually think he's entirely real?

"has uses in surveillance security mapping in real time"

Is particularly special - the suggested conspiracy is that you need a certain speed of wifi to be able to use your phone's camera/microphone to 3d map your surroundings to spy on you.

It's one of those concepts that's so cripplingly bonkers and silly you know anyone who repeats it is already so far off the deep end they need rehabilitation and education, not just pointing out they're wrong.

This isn't a real thing. These are automated attempts to recruit more into the woo-pool after finding a site that looked like it might have suitable targets.

[DeanoL]

3 hours ago, Roger G Lewis said:

Regarding 5g, the age old question is Que Bono, who benefits? 

YouTube streamers, instagram models, social media addicts... wait this is a conspiracy by them? Pewdiepie is Illuminati?

[paulshane]

19 hours ago, zero000 said:

By the West Holts field there was a poster asking you to call if 5G had made a chicken egg boil. I called it and a women answered but I chickened out and hung up. Wish I'd carried on with the call now. Was hoping for a good spoof.

there were lots of other posters by the same people dotted about the site, a Sting 'tantric sex' one and some others I totally can't remember

[tumbles]

4 hours ago, DeanoL said:

YouTube streamers, instagram models, social media addicts... wait this is a conspiracy by them? Pewdiepie is Illuminati?

The increase in bandwidth in theory would allow everyone to use mobile data easier as well. 

[paulshane]

Just now, tumbles said:

The increase in bandwidth in theory would allow everyone to use mobile data easier as well. 

a sim card equpped router for -decent- home internet is certainly do-able once coverage expands.

[tumbles]

1 minute ago, paulshane said:

a sim card equpped router for -decent- home internet is certainly do-able once coverage expands.

Overnight destroying BT's line rental monopoly.... and you wonder why they got back into the Mobile business a few years ago!

[paulshane]

8 minutes ago, tumbles said:

Overnight destroying BT's line rental monopoly.... and you wonder why they got back into the Mobile business a few years ago!

yeah

 

BT 'Busniness's current strategy is to move away from fixed lines completely, they are ditching PSTN, ISDN2 / 30 etc and want to just do fibre.

handy for me, as fitting a leased line and some hosted phones at a customers place is much easier to look after than fitting an on prem phone system with 'real' lines.

[Roger G Lewis]

5 hours ago, frostypaw said:

If you look at the rate this guy posts here, posts on twitter and posts blogs does anyone actually think he's entirely real?

"has uses in surveillance security mapping in real time"

Is particularly special - the suggested conspiracy is that you need a certain speed of wifi to be able to use your phone's camera/microphone to 3d map your surroundings to spy on you.

It's one of those concepts that's so cripplingly bonkers and silly you know anyone who repeats it is already so far off the deep end they need rehabilitation and education, not just pointing out they're wrong.

This isn't a real thing. These are automated attempts to recruit more into the woo-pool after finding a site that looked like it might have suitable targets.

Hold on there frosty 'I'm being the conspiracy nut around here .
 

 

So who appointed you as the thought crime policeman then?

[frostypaw]

1 minute ago, Roger G Lewis said:

So who appointed you as the thought crime policeman then?

Try and explain slowly to the group, in a way that doesn't make us laugh, how pointing out you're talking bollocks and not actually engaging in conversation in any honest way has anything whatsoever to do with 'thought crime'

I'm going to keep copying cues onto this script, see you later.

Edited July 5, 2019 by frostypaw

[tumbles]

FREEE TOMMEH. Oh. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48887440 

[Roger G Lewis]

9 hours ago, eFestivals said:

There is no "EU military unification".

I pointed out the fact-free at headline level, which proves there's no truth to be found by delving deeper.  

Oh Really?

 

 

[Roger G Lewis]

8 minutes ago, tumbles said:

FREEE TOMMEH. Oh. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48887440 

 

It will be interesting to read the full judgement when it is released. Also to see what appeal might follow.

 

[frostypaw]

17 minutes ago, Roger G Lewis said:

Oh Really?

<paranoid stuff>

Yes we are looking to work closer together, to form a more united NATO like force - but it shows you don't really get how this works. Macron and Merkel and May can say anything they like - it requires agreement to move forwards on these plans. How on earth do you think it's run?!?

Beyond that why are you so scared?!?!?! What's so terrible about Europe being able to defend itself?

Or will you admit it's just playing up to the "here come ze germans" and paranoia that they'll overrun us for our sweet precious crumpets and jam? Does it really show just how weak, frail and pathetic those caught by lies like this are - that they picture britain as a cowering infant?

Sorry buddy we're better than that. We're a tall proud nation and we'll help lead us to the future, not run from it. Scared of Europe, scared of Science scared of Religion - is there anything in life you're not scared of?

[Roger G Lewis]

28 minutes ago, frostypaw said:

Try and explain slowly to the group, in a way that doesn't make us laugh, how pointing out you're talking bollocks and not actually engaging in conversation in any honest way has anything whatsoever to do with 'thought crime'

I'm going to keep copying cues onto this script, see you later.

Frosty, is that the royal us? It matters not a jot to me what you or (Us), The Royal we or anyone else Thinks or says. I joined an interesting discussion regarding 5G and some people , yourself included have decided that is a sign of Thought crime, tin foil hattery and general weak mindedness.
Arguments against the well documented and linked too material under my own comments outline the information upon which I have formed whatever views I might hold on these subjects, That you may or may not hold a different view to me, troubles me not at all. That you feel troubled by what you consider my wrong think is a shame for you, we or us  but is  of no concern to me.

 

[zero000]

3 hours ago, paulshane said:

there were lots of other posters by the same people dotted about the site, a Sting 'tantric sex' one and some others I totally can't remember

That's the one! Wish I'd gone through with the call...

[frostypaw]

7 hours ago, Roger G Lewis said:

Arguments against the well documented and linked too material under my own comments outline the information upon which I have formed whatever views I might hold on these subjects,

A complete rebuttal was posted, you utterly ignored it and just posted more of your blog.

Being wrong doesn't mean it was a 'thought crime' it's just being wrong, try not to be so sensitive. Much like the people who thought driving over 30 would rip the souls from their bodies you'll get over it.