Jump to content

5G @ Glastonbury 2019


risteard
 Share

Recommended Posts

I've heard that 5g is going to be far from site wide, but anyway, info for anyone interested. BTW, I don't have strong views either way and don't know enough about it all to be able to make any useful comments yet :)

GLASTONBURY FESTIVAL 5G UPDATE!

Following a meeting between Glastonbury Festival Ltd and Pilton parish council last night, Glastonbury Festival Ltd operations manager MARK CANN (pictured below) has been held responsible for ensuring the public requests listed below are met.

If you are attending Glastonbury Festival this year or have 5G concerns I recommend emailing mark.cann@glastonburyfestivals.co.uk and ask that you be sent the requested information.

1. That the exact technical specifications of the 5G masts being erected at Glastonbury festival be made publicly available in advance of the festival commencement date.

2. That the safety reports and risk assessments provided to you by EE or other professional body be made available for public scrutiny in their entirety in advance of the festival commencement date.

3. That a meeting be scheduled between Glastonbury Festival Ltd and concerned parties in advance of the festival commencement date in order that concerns regarding the 5G technology being deployed are openly and transparently dealt with.

4. That maps be produced in advance of the festival commencement date indicating the exact location of the 5G masts so that concerned parties, in particular pregnant women and parents, are able to take the necessary precautions and avoid these locations.

5g pilton.jpg

Edited by Sawdusty Surfer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.

Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.

http://freewestmedia.com/2018/05/25/5g-technology-responsible-for-health-issues-in-uk-town-says-citizen/

https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks

To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

5G map of the UK:

https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/

And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog

 

  • Downvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you’re worried about 5g I’ve got some really bad news for you about the lethal levels of dihydrogenmonoixde that have been found on site!

It’s lethal to humans in tiny doses, and wait until you see what it does to unprotected metals!!! I demand to know why they think it’s okay to expose us to something like that?!

Get a grip people! For starters read a book called bad science by Ben Goldacre.

Look carefully for words like “could” and “potentially” when you’re reading these so called studies. 

Too much of pretty much anything will kill you, and it’s really easy to write a sensationalist headline based off bad science, and lack of scientific understanding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.

Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.

http://freewestmedia.com/2018/05/25/5g-technology-responsible-for-health-issues-in-uk-town-says-citizen/

https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks

To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

5G map of the UK:

https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/

And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog

 

stop scaremongering you clueless tw*t

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.

Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.

http://freewestmedia.com/2018/05/25/5g-technology-responsible-for-health-issues-in-uk-town-says-citizen/

https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks

To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

5G map of the UK:

https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/

And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog

 

Oh fuck off and learn about non ionising radiation you absolute whopper 

All phones have been working around 2.4ghz - the microwave band - for about the past 20 years 

Edited by tumbles
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The effect on humans will be extremely minimal. I work at BT/EE and sell 4G masts to large businesses, moving onto 5G now and none of the IT professionals i have worked with have any concerns about the effects of 5G on their staff. In fact, not a single person has questioned the health issues and are just really excited to take advantage of a great piece of technology

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Old_Johno said:

If you’re worried about 5g I’ve got some really bad news for you about the lethal levels of dihydrogenmonoixde that have been found on site!

It’s lethal to humans in tiny doses, and wait until you see what it does to unprotected metals!!! I demand to know why they think it’s okay to expose us to something like that?!

Get a grip people! For starters read a book called bad science by Ben Goldacre.

Look carefully for words like “could” and “potentially” when you’re reading these so called studies. 

Too much of pretty much anything will kill you, and it’s really easy to write a sensationalist headline based off bad science, and lack of scientific understanding. 

Fortunately there won't be any dihydrogenmonoxide on site this year. PHEW. 

 

Although cider has lots of it in, so.... boycott???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Derek Reynolds said:

People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.

Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.

http://freewestmedia.com/2018/05/25/5g-technology-responsible-for-health-issues-in-uk-town-says-citizen/

https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks

To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

5G map of the UK:

https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/

And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog

 

There are few things that upset me, but this kind of utter bollocks is why we have kids not being vaccinated, the climate crisis, fucking Trump and effing brexit. Christ on a bike - do some proper research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Derek Reynolds said:

People need to realise that wireless technology is advancing fast, and while 5G may give us faster, better communications through its millimetre wave form, it comes at a price. At the heart of 5G are transmitters that are of the same family as microwave ovens. The transmitting masts may seem benign, and the manufacturers will state they are, but this is the same technology behind Active Denial systems - Google them - it's classified as weaponry.

Gateshead Council were recently in court over their placing 5G transmitters atop lamp-posts after a claim was made by Mark Steele over the alleged use of 5G. This is a controversial subject, but as with smoke, there is often a fire.

http://freewestmedia.com/2018/05/25/5g-technology-responsible-for-health-issues-in-uk-town-says-citizen/

https://www.vigiliae.org/mark-steele-exposed/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJVY9Q7q3Ks

To evaluate the dangers of smart phones/tablets and meters and their detrimental effects on the human body with special importance to children, and even the unborn in the womb, there is information here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwyDCHf5iCY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0NEaPTu9oI

5G map of the UK:

https://5g.co.uk/news/ee-first-5g-network-six-cities/4912/

And whilst the presenter might have chosen a better piece of 'music' as an intro; and the messenger could present better!, listen to the message!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2110&v=FK8v1P-Psog

 

Related image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/25/glastonbury-festival-goers-are-walking-into-an-emf-minefield/

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/29/mass-microwaving-of-hundreds-of-thousands-at-glastonbury-festival-heres-the-video-evidence/

No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/25/glastonbury-festival-goers-are-walking-into-an-emf-minefield/

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/29/mass-microwaving-of-hundreds-of-thousands-at-glastonbury-festival-heres-the-video-evidence/

No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.

 

63A92733-D892-486A-A9CC-F34C75AF9FEE.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2019 at 1:39 PM, Michaelgball said:

The effect on humans will be extremely minimal. I work at BT/EE and sell 4G masts to large businesses, moving onto 5G now and none of the IT professionals i have worked with have any concerns about the effects of 5G on their staff. In fact, not a single person has questioned the health issues and are just really excited to take advantage of a great piece of technology

You sound like a very gullible young man Michael. Do some research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too

and your proof is....? None at all.

Yes, waveforms can affect cells, but not at the low-power and distance that 5G uses.

Get back to us if/when you have some actual relevant research to back up your currently-false claim.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/25/glastonbury-festival-goers-are-walking-into-an-emf-minefield/

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/29/mass-microwaving-of-hundreds-of-thousands-at-glastonbury-festival-heres-the-video-evidence/

No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.

You are a temendous idiot.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Derek Reynolds said:

Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/25/glastonbury-festival-goers-are-walking-into-an-emf-minefield/

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/29/mass-microwaving-of-hundreds-of-thousands-at-glastonbury-festival-heres-the-video-evidence/

No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.

I had a peak at those two links - they are on the surface, news articles.  It would be the same as providing a Daily Mail link, as evidence of the levels or rubbish left behind at the end of the festival. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/25/2019 at 4:56 PM, Derek Reynolds said:

Someone suggested I did some research. These are papers and websites that have done research into the effect of EMF, particularly on the most vulnerable - children.

...

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279863242_Oxidative_mechanisms_of_biological_activity_of_low-intensity_radiofrequency_radiation

...

Enjoy your festival. Take some Sun cream. (Hats, tin-foil or otherwise, optional).

 

I had a quick look at this one, as something with the website title "Researchgate" sounded very "sciency". 

 

It is a link to a published paper, reviewing a stack of other studies about low-intensity radiofrequency radiation, concluding that the studies reviewed on balance support the position that it is "bad" (being simplistic).  It claims to be "peer reviewed" (also a sign to take things seriously).  A quick internet search shows this paper published everywhere. 

 

A quick internet search also shows though potential holes in the paper.  According to the link below, there is no methodology on articles selected (and the suggestion that the ones selected reflect a positive bias on the ones selected), and they question how the article is "peer reviewed" (note the website link you included doesn't make that clear either).

 

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/28557/are-the-methods-and-conclusions-of-the-study-clear-connection-between-wireless

 

The above link reviewed the paper in your link, although from another website.  They make a good point that the original website they reviewed the article on will publish pretty much anything, and give a few examples.  I had a look at the researchgate.net website, and they seem to have the same policy.  I especially liked the paper on "dirty electricity" and how that is the reason why people are fat and have diabetes (not their diet and exercise or anything). 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239940746_Evidence_that_dirty_electricity_is_causing_the_worldwide_epidemics_of_obesity_and_diabetes

 

I'm not questioning your right to a opinion, but you've made a proposition - that "5G is bad".  It's really up to you to show that, not to cut & paste a bunch of links from a blog somewhere (which is what your post looks like), where the first one I look at is at best, described as a bit "shady".

 

 

Edited by EasyUserName
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Derek Reynolds said:

Glad the weather held out. For the nay-sayers and name callers:

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/25/glastonbury-festival-goers-are-walking-into-an-emf-minefield/

https://theholisticworks.com/2019/06/29/mass-microwaving-of-hundreds-of-thousands-at-glastonbury-festival-heres-the-video-evidence/

No, this is not scare mongering, it's drawing your attention to something that whilst you cannot see, is nonetheless there affecting not just your body, but that of animals and plants too. But then who gives a shit? Maybe you will one day.

I've done some research and the earth looks flat from here and there are some guys online saying it is - they even have a youtube 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tumbles said:

Touché

Look up the meaning of touché.

1 hour ago, paulshane said:

You are a temendous idiot.

I think you mean - tremendous?

 

22 minutes ago, frostypaw said:

I've done some research and the earth looks flat from here and there are some guys online saying it is - they even have a youtube 

There's an entire society devoted to it. Don't buy it myself.

Sawdustysurfer might be interested in this (or not, whatever).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvQ3Eb2j2jw

Adios from the tremendous touché. And remember: don't learn a little - learn a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...