Jump to content

Janet Jackson Headlining?


LastWaltz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Again I'm not an expert but part of why she got a bit of attention in the first instance - at least in the UK - is that she more or less told them all to do one and went off to work with Jam & Lewis on her own.  Granted she did Scream with Michael....but if we're going to bin all his collaborators then we also need to bin Macca, Stevie Wonder, Mick Jagger and Freddie Mercury.

 

And Siedah Garrett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, H.M.V said:

People must be dumb as fuck if they think that Janet is even remotely associated with any of this. She was always detached from the family. I actually remember being rather surprised when she did scream with Michael. If she is booked I for one will be welcoming it. She would be a brilliant addition. 

Beggars belief that anyone would backlash someone for the alleged crimes of another. 

For what its worth, I think Michael is guilty. I believe those lads absolutely and evidence to me is irrefutable. 

Emphasis added. Presented without comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Again I'm not an expert but part of why she got a bit of attention in the first instance - at least in the UK - is that she more or less told them all to do one and went off to work with Jam & Lewis on her own.  Granted she did Scream with Michael....but if we're going to bin all his collaborators then we also need to bin Macca, Stevie Wonder, Mick Jagger and Freddie Mercury.

 

And Siedah Garrett.

It’s nothing to do with collaborators though. My point right now is the Jackson family themselves aren’t the darlings of the press at the moment and Glastonbury booking Janet is likely to rub a lot of people up the wrong way.

In no way am I excusing or even agreeing with the criticism it would recieve but it’s going to happen if it does. It also might leave a really sour taste on the crowd over the weekend when she does perform. A lot of people don’t like the Jackson family for what they have done and they might wish to boycot because they don’t want to provide them any platforms.

Unfortunately Janet is completely innocent in this situation yet she will receive backlash from this. Because this is unfortunately how our world is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

In no way am I excusing or even agreeing with the criticism it would recieve but it’s going to happen if it does. It also might leave a really sour taste on the crowd over the weekend when she does perform. A lot of people don’t like the Jackson family for what they have done and they might wish to boycot because they don’t want to provide them any platforms.

People have been angry about Jay-Z, U2, The Stones, Metallica, Kanye, The Who etc... and to varying degrees this received some attention. Didn’t really affect most people’s enjoyment of them (or what they chose over them) and it was largely forgotten by, or soon after, the show with them being judged mainly on their actual performance.

I don’t see how this would be any different.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t judge acts on their actions but in this case we have no reason to believe she has done anything wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DJL said:

People have been angry about Jay-Z, U2, The Stones, Metallica, Kanye, The Who etc... and to varying degrees this received some attention..

I do think this is a lil bit different to people just disliking their music or their personality though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Matt42 said:

I do think this is a lil bit different to people just disliking their music or their personality though.

different, cos they are alive and the geezer you think there'll be a protest about is dead? ;) :P 

There will probably be some pricks on social media, but those pricks are on social media being pricks every day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will all amount to someone thinking it funny to create an offensive flag with Michael Jackson some kids and Jimmy’s saville on it alongside a witty slogan.

to be fair when I was in my younger years I would have found it funny but as you get older you tend to be more considerate of people’s feelings.

Expect it to cause much hilllarity on Facebook, be divided on twitter and generally thought of as a dick move on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Matt42 said:

I do think this is a lil bit different to people just disliking their music or their personality though.

I wasn’t really referring to people disliking their music or personality. I meant U2 and Rolling Stones’ tax evasion, Metallica’s hunting, (arguable) racism towards Jay-Z and Kanye and Pete Townshend’s  (allegations of) downloading child pornography. 

Sure these aren’t the crimes that Michael is accused of but it isn’t Michael it’s Janet. There may be an idiot or two with a flag and there may be a frustrated response from people around them which would affect atmosphere in that area... but I think that would largely be lost in a pretty busy and otherwise enthusiastic pyramid crowd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Jacksons played in 2017, and a huge section of the public has believed MJ was a nonce for about 30 years. This doc has only made it more difficult for some people to refute and brought it back into the public eye again. It's not like this is new and sudden information, the two guys in the doc have been talking about it for 3 or 4 years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

according to today's Scum, relatives of Michael Jackson are angry at Janet Jackson for refusing to speak out in defence of her brother.

Why woudl she, I don;t think she is certain that it didn;t go on , or she knows it did.

 

this whole defense of Michael saying "he didn't have a child hood, so it's OK for him to want sleep overs with 7 year olds" doesn't wash with me.

 

Janet is not guilty of anything that i know of, except getting her nip out ( hope she does it again) wouldn't mind her playing doubt she would headline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to go out on a limb and say it's all going to be fine:

  • She's not the headliner.
  • It's her brother that's being accused, not her.
  • Her brother is dead.
  • As observed, she's not been defending him.

It's actually the first point that is being underplayed on here - all the other protests people can think of have been in relation to the headliners.  I'm doubt Neil Lonsdale has been keeping up with his GOLD membership, so probably doesn't have a clue she's playing and still won't once the festival is over.

Nothing to see here.

 

BTW - if the latest revelations have really changed your view about Michael Jackson, then you're probably a bit too good at lying to yourself than is healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Or that you've not really paid that much attention to the details of all the various claims and counter-claims over the years but recognise that 4 hours worth of fairly harrowing testimony is probably going to be a game'changer in terms of how he's going to be perceived going forward. 

Yes, I very much fall into this category. That documentary was an extremely difficult watch at times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

Or that you've not really paid that much attention to the details of all the various claims and counter-claims over the years but recognise that 4 hours worth of fairly harrowing testimony is probably going to be a game'changer in terms of how he's going to be perceived going forward. 

Agree with this.  Obviously, I had a basic knowledge of the allegations but tbh, I was very much of the school of thought that he'd stood trial and been acquitted so that was good enough for me.  The documentary has changed my view on MJ and I 100% believe Robson and Safechuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stuartbert two hats said:

Did you believe he wasn't a paedophile before the documentary came out?

I knew he was a paedophile but I suppose I never looked into in what depth his behaviour went. Given the very detailed and strikingly similar testimony of the two guys in the documentary, now I'm convinced of what he was and to what level

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
    • K.O.G. were one of my favourite acts at EOTR a couple of years ago. Just a joyful afrobeat danceathon
    • Can tell you about a 1.5k ticket if you're interested lad? Not more at face value I don't think, sorry! Although if I hear owt else back I'll drop you a message 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...