Jump to content

The 1975 2020


Mash011
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, dentalplan said:

Maybe I’m weird and everyone is doing this then. Just I’m so far behind with albums from acts that I do like that I dunno how I could jump in on acts that I don’t just to confirm that I still don’t like them. I like Drake a bit but definitely not an instant listen.

Well I have to check the album out otherwise I havent really got a reason for not liking the band/artist. 

by checking an album out do you mean actually sitting there from the start to end. Do you not sometimes skip some songs you’re just not feeling? I don’t always sit through the entire thing before forming an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Well I have to check the album out otherwise I havent really got a reason for not liking the band/artist. 

by checking an album out do you mean actually sitting there from the start to end. Do you not sometimes skip some songs you’re just not feeling? I don’t always sit through the entire thing before forming an opinion.

No I’ll usually listen to an album two or three times before dishing an opinion out. And if it’s a premature opinion I’ll usually mention that much.

I’ve never listened to a Catfish and the Bottlemen album in full but I still feel qualified to say that they are dog shit.

1 minute ago, jparx said:

I'm not a fan of the band, but as a music fan I'll make a point to give any new release a listen. Particularly something from a band with a lot of hype around them. 

I think I’m just a boomer not keeping up with the culture

Edited by dentalplan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take the approach that if something doesn’t hook me in I won’t really bother with it. I take a glance over various stuff and I give them an opportunity to “sell themselves”, but if they don’t hook me I’l move on quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll listen to maybe 1 or two songs that have hype even behind an act I'm not majorly into but there is certainly artists that full albums listens I won't do so with.

I'm unsure why you would listen to an album from an artist you don't like. A bands music that you've never been interested in is different as the approach might chance but I'm not going to go to stand watching music anymore by someone I dislike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've listened to noacf about 8 times or so now in full all the way thru. I really like it! I enjoy the instrumentals, I wouldn't say they were filler. I think it all flows nicely to say there's so much going on and so many different styles. I'm enjoying it, I don't think it's easy  listening for anyone who isn't really that interested in listening to it if that makes sense?? 

I also really like the mindshower thing, I think its cool they did that with all the samples and pics etc :)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

melon is right here.

This is why the album is just nothing to me. it's a mix of different ideas which don't join up, and it's probably because they know their fans will make online theories about the album to try and make it all make sense. 

There is a good album hidden in here if a lot was just cut out. However they have got some good stuff, this album is just a bit too much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matt42 said:

melon is right here.

This is why the album is just nothing to me. it's a mix of different ideas which don't join up, and it's probably because they know their fans will make online theories about the album to try and make it all make sense. 

There is a good album hidden in here if a lot was just cut out. However they have got some good stuff, this album is just a bit too much.

 

Is that you Matt, your YouTube channel?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Matt42 said:

Omg imagine if I was melon

i was agreeing with his review

I know, that would be sensational. I agree with the review, meh album, has great songs mixed with some bad fillers. All sounds recorded from different studios. Doesnt work together but has glimpses of class.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my first 1975 album and I honestly quite enjoyed it. Lots of great tracks, but as an album there were were two main problems for me.

1) the ordering was all over the place. Who thought a Greta monologue into People into a Orchestral instrumental was a good idea

2) too many repeats of the same idea. They nailed it with People imo, just 1 taste of that heavier style and thats all you get for the whole album. Come back to it on its own project, but for this kinda "selection box" take on an album just shoot your best shot at that style and move on

I really need to get around to going over their back catalogue at some point. I've also attempted to cut it down + restructure it to something that I would come back to.

 

1. Guys

2. Me & You Together Song

3. People

4. Then Because She Goes

5. Nothing Revealed / Everything Denied

6. Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America

7. Frail State Of Mind

8. I Think There's Something You Should Know

9. What Should I Say

10. If You're Too Shy (Let Me Know)

Edited by Mattymooz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Chawk said:

The audacity to have a speech about the climate emergency to open the album. After going on a world tour. Not just that, but then play that track as the encore at those concerts. 

Unbelievable. 

Mans literally existence on the planet damages the climate.

Maybe the large corporations with a poor carbon footprint are more worthwhile to target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Mans literally existence on the planet damages the climate.

Maybe the large corporations with a poor carbon footprint are more worthwhile to target.

aye, it just doesn't sit right with me playing that message to their fans when 99% of fans will have a much lower carbon footprint than the band themselves. 

Extinction Rebellion and Greta Thurnburg advocate a pretty purist approach of just not flying unless it's an emergency, the band definitely aren't doing that. If they believed in the message, why are they flying to Australia, the USA etc. They are telling their fans to live by a rule that they don't.

Edited by Chawk
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Matt42 said:

Maybe the large corporations with a poor carbon footprint are more worthwhile to target.

who do you think those large corporations are making product for...? ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, syc1818 said:

pic

My first post in this topic definitely could have been better worded so this is fair criticism, but it's not what I'm suggesting-  absolutely it's OK to encourage improving society whilst still participating in it. 

But the level of that encouragement and the level of your carbon footprint is what matters. If you make massive environmental statements to people, I think that you should have also lowered your carbon footprint as much as you can. The 1975 agree I think, by having statements like this in the opening track

"The main solution, however, is so simple that even a small child can understand it
We have to stop our emissions of greenhouse gases
And either we do that, or we don't"

So, as they have said on their own album, the single biggest impact they could have is to stop emitting green house gases, by stopping flying for example.

I don't think it's right to play the above statement to your fans, when your band has just flown to Australia. We've seen with carbon credits that carbon mitigation is inefficient, they best way to reduce your impact is to reduce carbon at the source. Whilst tree planting is great, it's miles better to not release the carbon in the first place.

(just to say I'm not anti environmental. I work in conservation including for tree planting charities) 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Latest Activity

    • So long as you requested your bus via the transport survey before April 15th, you're all good - there haven't been any confirmation emails yet 
    • Did some digging online. Well, you did ask.   There isn't much there that's very recent. An application for planning permission for "use of land for siting of up to 16 low impact residential shelters within a woodland garden setting and associated operational development comprising car park, telephone box, and children's play structure" was rejected in 1999 - though apparently there was a "legal breakthrough" in 2001. This is from 1995:   Clearly it's still in use. A resident called Theo Simon stood for election to the local council (for the Green Party) in 2017. His band, Seize the Day, seems to play Glastonbury every year (at Toad Hall, Small World, sometimes other sets elsewhere). This is a video of their 2019 set:     There's an interview with him, probably filmed at Kings Hill, here. He sounds pretty cool if you ask me.   https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/why-religion-matters/0/steps/73899   This is from a university thesis submitted in 1999:   The King’s Hill Collective The King’s Hill Collective can be seen as solution to increasing pressures of living on the road for Travellers who were bringing up children and as a solution to (and rejection of) mainstream consumerist society by non Travellers many of whom were originally city dwellers. Nevertheless because many of the members had direct travelling experience, this community provided an example of one extreme in a continuum between those Travellers for whom the tag ‘New Age’ is a complete irrelevance and those for whom it is at least understandable if not desirable. This group is on the ‘New Age’, ecologically aware, ideologically ‘hippie’ and ‘sorted’ end of the New Age Traveller continuum discussed in the previous chapter. The site, which overlooks Pilton farm (the site of the Glastonbury Festival), is slowly maturing now with numerous trees, vegetables and a fully functioning water bore hole which supplies the site with drinking water. Water is extracted on a weekly basis using an old petrol engine and pump. The water, which is filtered by a series of sand traps, is inspected on an annual basis. The collective is concerned to demonstrate its willingness to 243adhere to regulations were this is possible and not contrary to its collective ideology. There are 16 plots, each at some stage of the development of the site, having a bender.   The benders are almost exclusively constructed of light green Tarpaulin over a hazel wood matrix. Stainless steel flexi-vents lead from stoves in the benders. These act as chimneys supported by a single branch driven into the earth. The stoves are usually home-made conversions of gas cylinders which have been cut and welded into shape although there was an solid fuel Rayburn installed in one bender during the study period. Inside the benders bedding is arranged on wooden pallets or platforms and there is often an additional gas stove for cooking. Water is supplied either directly from the holding tank or stored in water barrels. Lighting is almost exclusively by candles or ‘hurricane lamps’. Twelve volt batteries and in one case a wind generator supplies electricity for radios and in one case a small black and white television. Some of the more established benders had a variety of trees and shrubs around the canvass construction including apple, pear and fig trees as well as a variety of fruits.   The collective is serviced by a pay telephone located in an old red telephone box. Its position, in the middle of a field, is as incongruous as the lamp post in C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books and is in a way reminiscent of the TARDIS of Doctor Who, adding to the slightly surreal or magical atmosphere of the place. Inside a small domestic pay phone is installed and managed by one of the community.   At the centre of the site is a clearing of grass that acts as a communal area surrounded by a small circular mound inside of which runs a circular ditch in the fashion of a place of worship. In the centre of the circle is a small collection of sea stones collected from a nearby shoreline. There are four gaps in the mound representing the solstices and equinoxes, which correspond to the cardinal points of the compass. Each section of the mound was constructed during the period of the year that it represents. There are symbols representing Beltane and other significant calendar dates placed appropriately on the circle. The King’s Hill site owes its existence to Chris Black, a man who was broadly sympathetic to alternative lifestyles and provided initial financial support to the project. Chris Black purchased the field and ‘loaned’ sixteen plots to a number of Travellers and bender dwellers. The newly formed community developed a ‘constitution’ and organised a system whereby the loan of the plots was paid back over a period of two years through weekly contributions to a central fund. Thus after two years the land belonged to sixteen stakeholders.
    • K.O.G. were one of my favourite acts at EOTR a couple of years ago. Just a joyful afrobeat danceathon
    • Can tell you about a 1.5k ticket if you're interested lad? Not more at face value I don't think, sorry! Although if I hear owt else back I'll drop you a message 
  • Featured Products

  • Hot Topics

  • Latest Tourdates

×
×
  • Create New...